Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 10-08-2014 | 04:14 AM
  #2751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: 7ER Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
Ok. I thought you'd get the point.
Actually, I was hoping you would get the point...

"Small incremental changes/improvements will not even begin to restore our contract's buying power... not ever".

I do agree if we had 5% increases every year for my last 26yrs, we would be in great shape... but we did not.
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 04:22 AM
  #2752  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
Actually, I was hoping you would get the point...

"Small incremental changes/improvements will not even begin to restore our contract's buying power... not ever".

I do agree if we had 5% increases every year for my last 26yrs, we would be in great shape... but we did not.
So here we are again at square 1. The question to you is this: How much do you think we need on day 1, and how long are you willing to wait to get it?
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 04:51 AM
  #2753  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
This is just flat out wrong. There was no "big leap." If you take 1980's rates and adjust for inflation to today, they come out within a couple of bucks more than C2K rates adjusted for inflation to today.

During the 1990's, we had a concessionary contract (POS96). I don't know what the pay cut percentage was (maybe a single digit percentage) but it was practically nothing compared to the 42% cumulative cut we took in "the dark years." I don't remember what the percentage pay increase was with C2K either, but it was certainly not a "big leap." All C2K really did was to correct us back on track to where we were prior to POS96. And since POS96 wasn't that big of a pay cut, C2K couldn't have been that big of an increase either.
Agreed. Actually, I think that POS96 simply eliminated a scheduled pay increase.
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 04:52 AM
  #2754  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
I'll take that bet. What do you think it will be?
Here is one that comes to mind: The Company will want to modify sick pay.

We will have to provide notes from doctors for use over holidays, days before holidays, days after holidays, days before vacation, weeks before vacation, days after vacation, weeks after vacation, more than 10 hours, less than 10 hours, weekends, or weekdays. You get the idea.

There are lots of other possibilities. The Company will be creative and shameless in their "needs."
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 04:58 AM
  #2755  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
Here is one that comes to mind: The Company will want to modify sick pay.

We will have to provide notes from doctors for use over holidays, days before holidays, days after holidays, days before vacation, weeks before vacation, days after vacation, weeks after vacation, more than 10 hours, less than 10 hours, weekends, or weekdays. You get the idea.
I do, but that was in the survey. The topic is a concession that was not in the survey.
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 05:56 AM
  #2756  
Karnak's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Actually, if you wrench the numbers a bit, C2000 wasn't a "big leap". Most of the increase was to regain buying power that had been on a steady decline since 1984.

Most of what C2000 did was provide "restoration".

Nu
If I "wrench the numbers a bit", I can prove the Sun orbits the Earth!

But it doesn't.

It doesn't matter if you call it "restoration", a "great leap", or "righteous justice" - it was a rate of increase in one contract greater than the increases achieved by other airlines that didn't see subsequent concessions during LivingTheDream's "dark years".

Timbo and LivingTheDream jump aboard with ""Small incremental changes/improvements will not even begin to restore our contract's buying power... not ever". Maybe they could start a thread calling out Southwest, FedEx, and UPS pilots for destroying our profession with their underachieving contract history. Just be prepared to respond to how they could possibly have found themselves earning more than us using their incremental gains strategy.

The term "restoration" should be banned from any contract discussions. We should position ourselves so we aren't vulnerable to the abrupt losses that result in the need for restoration in the future. It's been done by others. That was the history I was providing.
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 06:31 AM
  #2757  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

I like the way you think. Maybe we should just take no raises or even a slight pay cut to pre-fund our next pay cuts when the economy falters. That way the pay cuts would be less as we would have a bank




Originally Posted by Karnak
If I "wrench the numbers a bit", I can prove the Sun orbits the Earth!

But it doesn't.

It doesn't matter if you call it "restoration", a "great leap", or "righteous justice" - it was a rate of increase in one contract greater than the increases achieved by other airlines that didn't see subsequent concessions during LivingTheDream's "dark years".

Timbo and LivingTheDream jump aboard with ""Small incremental changes/improvements will not even begin to restore our contract's buying power... not ever". Maybe they could start a thread calling out Southwest, FedEx, and UPS pilots for destroying our profession with their underachieving contract history. Just be prepared to respond to how they could possibly have found themselves earning more than us using their incremental gains strategy.

The term "restoration" should be banned from any contract discussions. We should position ourselves so we aren't vulnerable to the abrupt losses that result in the need for restoration in the future. It's been done by others. That was the history I was providing.
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 06:39 AM
  #2758  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
I like the way you think. Maybe we should just take no raises or even a slight pay cut to pre-fund our next pay cuts when the economy falters. That way the pay cuts would be less as we would have a bank
LOL. Too bad we don't have more people in our MEC who think like Karnak. Oh wait... WE DO!
Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 06:56 AM
  #2759  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Skinny girl. Long legs. Big engines.
Default

Shouldn't we all want as much as possible without killing the golden goose? Call it what you want, restoration, incremental gains, fat moolah. Just show me the money!

Fwiw, I have no idea how to get it. I just want it. Our union educated us on the "time value of money". With that in mind, we should all want the biggest raise, restoration, as quick as possible!!!!


Reply
Old 10-08-2014 | 06:59 AM
  #2760  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
First: the survey certainly provides data points to the NC. But if ALPA never releases the survey results or completion rate to us or to the company, how does 100% participation generate "unity" or "leverage?"

Second: if ALPA neeeds a survey to know we want massive gains with zero concessions...they really are out of touch.

Unity is not built by talking points or memos from MD.
Well, I thought you opined the company knows the results of the survey about the same time as the MEC. Who says they can't or don't use the information in direct negotiations? ie the company says "X" and our negotiators can show 90% of our folks said "no way to that." I agree with releasing the big picture of the survey as our targets. I don't agree with releasing every detail as I hope you are wrong about company spies and I think releasing everything disadvantages us. In any event how does "Not Participating" help or empower our reps? Unity=Leverage=Our Most Basic First Step and it starts with the Contract Survey. IMO. OFG
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices