Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

gloopy 05-26-2015 07:18 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1888601)
Scoop-
Those raises are not annual or automatic.
They only occur if and when management gives pay raises to the other employee groups.
Even then, we only get the lower of the two metrics.

Section 3.B.4

With our current PS levels and the prospect of the company holding the entire labor force hostage over this just to attempt to stick it to us, we should call their bluff and wait it out long before we eat concessions to pay for a raise.

gloopy 05-26-2015 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by dtfl (Post 1888760)
Oops " Adding 125 76 seat jets would equate to 450 76 seat jets and if it was unlimited 70 seaters as well, it would then go above the current cap of 450. " He went on to say this rumor does not pass the logic test.

What if they kept the current 70 seat limit…but went from max certifiable/weight limits to currently installed? Because as of now most or all 70 seaters are really 64 seaters. So they could double the number of 70 seaters by keeping the on paper limit of 70 seaters while merely changing the definition of 70 seater. NO SCOPE CONCESSIONS! NONE!

Check Essential 05-26-2015 07:27 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1888964)
With our current PS levels and the prospect of the company holding the entire labor force hostage over this just to attempt to stick it to us, we should call their bluff and wait it out long before we eat concessions to pay for a raise.

Exactly.
It's nice to have a "me too" policy that works for us for a change.

gloopy 05-26-2015 07:30 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1888968)
Exactly.
It would be nice to have a "me too" policy that works for us for a change.

Time value of money is one thing but the time value of concessions is something I just can't wrap my mind around, especially in the most positive negotiating environment in a long time if ever.

NO CONCESSIONS!

Alan Shore 05-26-2015 07:34 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1888958)
Counselor Shore is always correct. Except that time he blew it with Molly Ringwald. Big mistake.

Except that it kept me open for my relationship with Tara, which I also later blew.

Attachment 2092

gzsg 05-26-2015 07:39 AM


Originally Posted by dtfl (Post 1888760)
Oops " Adding 125 76 seat jets would equate to 450 76 seat jets and if it was unlimited 70 seaters as well, it would then go above the current cap of 450. " He went on to say this rumor does not pass the logic test.

Thanks!

Someone posted that on chitchat as from a rep.

IMO the dark side fed the rumor to make 70 76 seat jets for DCI seem like a win.

Hoping that's all bs.

Why would we make scope concessions in this environment?

forgot to bid 05-26-2015 11:51 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 1888984)
Thanks!

Someone posted that on chitchat as from a rep.

IMO the dark side fed the rumor to make 70 76 seat jets for DCI seem like a win.

Hoping that's all bs.

Why would we make scope concessions in this environment?

There are still 138 CRJ-200s they'd probably like to get rid of. Probably both in just getting rid of the airframes and excess capacity.

138 CR2s is about 6900 seats and those seats are not in use as much as the CR9s if I'm not mistaken. 6900 seats is around 90 CR9s. Use 70 CR9s and you'll probably have as much ASMs in a given day as you did with 138 CR2s.

Shooting from the hip. But it's a guess. The keys to getting more CR9s is in the PWA.

I'd say, let them have 70 more CR9s/E175s in the PWA.
As long as we fly them.

BenderRodriguez 05-26-2015 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1889164)
There are still 138 CRJ-200s they'd probably like to get rid of. Probably both in just getting rid of the airframes and excess capacity.

138 CR2s is about 6900 seats and those seats are not in use as much as the CR9s if I'm not mistaken. 6900 seats is around 90 CR9s. Use 70 CR9s and you'll probably have as much ASMs in a given day as you did with 138 CR2s.

Shooting from the hip. But it's a guess. The keys to getting more CR9s is in the PWA.

I'd say, let them have 70 more CR9s/E175s in the PWA.
As long as we fly them.

Here is a potential fly in the ointment. TIFWIW With the hiring that is currently going on, we will be training right seat RJ pilots who will have bids off the equipment before they finish indoc. The captain pay is similar to 7ERB, and we have newhires getting international lines before being TOE complete. This would be expensive to the company, and puts newhires on the chopping block since they are on probation and switching airpanes is a risky venture. In today environment, I am not so sure RJs are worth negotiating for. I personally think the rumor is a throw away.

Popcorn's done. Fire at will

Alan Shore 05-26-2015 12:18 PM


Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez (Post 1889177)
With the hiring that is currently going on, we will be training right seat RJ pilots who will have bids off the equipment before they finish indoc.

How would they do that, given the 1-year category freeze for new hires?

Gunfighter 05-26-2015 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez (Post 1889177)
Here is a potential fly in the ointment. TIFWIW With the hiring that is currently going on, we will be training right seat RJ pilots who will have bids off the equipment before they finish indoc. The captain pay is similar to 7ERB, and we have newhires getting international lines before being TOE complete. This would be expensive to the company, and puts newhires on the chopping block since they are on probation and switching airpanes is a risky venture. In today environment, I am not so sure RJs are worth negotiating for. I personally think the rumor is a throw away.

Popcorn's done. Fire at will

Every seat, mile, and passenger is scope worth negotiating for.

I'm not sure how RJ captain pay vs 7ERB pay is relevant to the scope issue.

The point about newhires on the chopping block by switching airplanes during probation doesn't make any sense. All new hires should be off probation at the same time they complete their new hire training freeze. If they do successfully bid to a new category while still on probation and don't make it through training, it was their individual risk to take. Bid what you want...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands