|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1889346)
Holding the line costs zero capital. Unless we're dumb enough to value in pre-made concessions or fall for the "bargaining credit" nonsense of selling jobs to management. They have all the small DC-9 sized RJ's we should ever give them. If anything we should start sunsetting what they do have.
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1889400)
We ALWAYS relax scope.
Every agreement for the last ten years has had scope concessions. This one will be no different. We'll probably get hit on the bottom with more 76 seaters and the top when the AF/KLM grievance magically goes away. Yep, Every contract we agree on Scope. But often before the Scope agreement is actually limiting we acquiesce to management and grant Scope relief............................................ .........again. What good is a Scope clause if it is never (or for a very, very minimal time) actually limiting? How about we just keep the Scope agreement we currently have. The agreement that management wanted and we gave them 3 years ago. Scoop :confused: |
Has anybody told Bender about decaf?
|
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1889560)
Has anybody told Bender about decaf?
|
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1889560)
Has anybody told Bender about decaf?
|
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 1889572)
Yes, but if it ain't the Oregon cheerleaders, he probably won't listen...
And this post is really curious coming from you |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1889581)
Listen? I hear it all loud and clear. Rumor and innuendo. No basis in fact yet. I totally agree with Scoop on the leak aspect of it too. But it's still fun to debate.
And this post is really curious coming from you |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1889581)
Listen? I hear it all loud and clear. Rumor and innuendo. No basis in fact yet. I totally agree with Scoop on the leak aspect of it too. But it's still fun to debate.
And this post is really curious coming from you |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1889588)
If you enjoy the debate, then change back to your original screen name. We all know you hit the crack pipe again and have to go thru the 12 steps to get off it.
|
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1889508)
Bravo! Buying it down, however is very expensive.
Same with the AS code share abuse. In fact, not doing so puts DL in a position of perpetual weakness by telling AS management that DL management places a high value on keeping the option open. Better for everyone if they slam the door shut permanently (at least to current levels). SEA is a hub, period. And the AF/KLM issue needs to be settled in a way that increases our share of flying in that and every other JV with strict penalties for non compliance since for half a decade they've shown no desire to honor their agreement without a strong penalty. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands