Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

forgot to bid 05-29-2015 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1891182)
The E-195 is already a mainline only airplane. Nothing needs to be given up to get them, and the company doesn't need a trick way out of dumb Mullin/Reid RJ leases to figure out how to afford to get into them. EMB would bend over backwards to get a DAL order.

Except.... if you guys allow us to reduce DCI 450 to $39.99.... I mean 395, as in a max of 395 jets, but you let those be all premium cabin mobile profitability center jumbo RJs, then we'll buy you EMB-190s.

That's a win win win. Remember from 2012? Fewer DCI jets. Fewer CR2s. More profitable upgauging jumbo RJs which means more profit sharing for us. You and I Gloop get our new Captain's seats (nevermind that you and I can hold M88A and 717A now).

It's a win win win for us, no brainer. Also, we keep them from doing what they wanted to do which was buy 500 Dash 8-400Qs. They were asking for an exemption and we said no.

So 70 more CRJ-900s, total 395 jumbo RJs, no CR2s, more profit, new E190s for mainline. And you and I can be Captains and as we taxi out to the runway and I realize you're behind me, I'm going to call tower using your call sign and tell them we're ready to go. :D



Sent using Tapatalk from my parents basement in Amarillo.

EdGrimley 05-29-2015 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1891459)
Except.... if you guys allow us to reduce DCI 450 to $39.99.... I mean 395, as in a max of 395 jets, but you let those be all premium cabin profitability center jumbo RJs, then we'll buy you EMB-190s.

That's a win win win. Remember? DCI wins more large RJs and they'll get rid of the CR2s, no more CR2s. New E190s =we get our new Captains seats Gloop, nevermind we can hold MD-88/90A and 717A now. AND fewer RJs = scope win. And the company upgauges which = more profit.

It's a win win win for us.

Also, we keep them from doing what they wanted to do which was buy 500 Dash 8-400Qs. They were asking for an exemption and we said no.





Sent using Tapatalk from my parents basement in Amarillo.

Funny and sad at the same time. I'm having flashbacks to C2012. I know at least one guy that's not too effected by "mature pilot contracts". Give to the right people and you'll be famous and money won't be an issue.

http://oi59.tinypic.com/b468lg.jpg

Big E 757 05-29-2015 12:29 PM


Originally Posted by EdGrimley (Post 1891471)
Funny and sad at the same time. I'm having flashbacks to C2012. I know at least one guy that's not too effected by "mature pilot contracts". Give to the right people and you'll be famous and money won't be an issue.

http://oi59.tinypic.com/b468lg.jpg

Is he still allowed to call himself Captain? What is he a Captain of these days?

Mesabah 05-29-2015 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by Big E 757 (Post 1891549)
Is he still allowed to call himself Captain? What is he a Captain of these days?

You know how it is.....you spend your whole career fighting management, and I mean really sticking it to them for the pilots you represent....then when you retire, management funnels you millions for your efforts.

Check Essential 05-29-2015 12:50 PM

scrolling...

Check Essential 05-29-2015 12:50 PM

still scrolling...

shiznit 05-29-2015 01:48 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1891247)
Not when it comes to the corruption of our governance Shiznit. That needs to turn outwards toward the members that can make the appropriate changes. .....This is exactly what's happening in our MEC administration. Our reps are letting us know. A very good thing.

Wrong, flat out wrong. They don't even admit as much in the op-ed. they use words like "for whatever reason" and "seems". No mention of any "corruption of governance" or like statements. There is a clear mechanism to remedy corruption, and there is a ethical and legal responsibility to take appropriate action to address such activity. Sending an op-ed that throws your NC and MEC under the bus doesn't fit that bill.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1891393)
Showing a united face to management that we're happy with concessions does EVERYTHING to get us a PWA with concessions. That's the point shiznit.

Not at all, no one is happy with concessions. Undermining the negotiators doesn't help undo concessions.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1891393)
It is the ONLY thing that will get us more money and more time off. This is throwing a huge wrench into the gears of a union relationship that RA was certain he had in the bag. RA and Campbell are extremely unhappy about this.

This is the best possible thing for Delta pilots.

Carl

It's not the ONLY thing, and save the pilot anger for when it can be leveraged.. The AA pilots were disgruntled all the time and the media, stock market, their own management just ignored them because it was part of the everyday existence. The leverage that the Delta pilots get to exert is that Richard has said "labor risk is off the table", remember? The ability to promise labor risk is a tool for the MEC and NC to use, but they don't get multiple shots once unleashed. It's use should be strategically placed on the table when needed, not thrown around by some local council missive and flushed down the drain.

The timing of it definitely couldn't be worse, right before direct negotiations enter the compensation discussions. If the opposition (management) already knows you are against whatever the NC brings forward, why bother offering anything? When in a business deal, there has to be an expectation that a deal can be reached. Walking in and saying, "No, I won't agree to or listen to anything you say" is not rational or reasonable.


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1891393)
With you shiznit, it's hard to know whether you really believe anything this naive or whether you're just carrying the water for the MEC administration...again.

Not naive, just willing to let the guys who helped pave the way for C2K do their thing now that it's their turn.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1891393)
There is absolutely zero chance that our negotiators are trying to go above our survey demands. None.

To use a "Carlism":

You have no way of knowing that. None. You're just a line pilot like the rest of us.

Oddly enough I agree and it applies to you too!

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1891393)
Translation: Profit sharing is bad and risky. We need to give it up for higher pay rates.

Translation: Profit sharing is bad and Completely wrong. The worst thing we could possibly show is a unified face of willingness to accept whatever we're told to accept by our unelected bureaucrats. When we show the face of refusal like we're showing now, that disorients management. That concerns them because labor risk was supposed to be completely off the table.

You are so bad at translation Carl. You don't have that right with me.

I think we have an absolutely spectacularly successful PS plan. (hatched and negotiated by the oft reviled Moak, O'Malley, Pinho, etc.) All it shows is that "winding the clock" isn't as economically advantageous as it may seem on the surface.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1891393)
Except I'm the one working hard to undermine that effort shiznit. I need to rethink what I'm doing here. Fast.

Carl

fyp

Flamer 05-29-2015 03:17 PM


Originally Posted by EdGrimley (Post 1891471)
Funny and sad at the same time. I'm having flashbacks to C2012. I know at least one guy that's not too effected by "mature pilot contracts". Give to the right people and you'll be famous and money won't be an issue.

http://oi59.tinypic.com/b468lg.jpg

If d-baggery were a word, it would be appropriate here.

Purple Drank 05-29-2015 03:30 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit[/QUOTE
I think we have an absolutely spectacularly successful PS plan. (hatched and negotiated by the oft reviled Moak, O'Malley, Pinho, etc.) All it shows is that "winding the clock" isn't as economically advantageous as it may seem on the surface.

C'mon, man. Profit sharing was negotiated BEFORE C12. You know that. All O'Malley did was trade it away and disengenuously include it in our "raise."

Those other guys stumbled onto profit sharing. To think they foresaw the insane profits Delta is enjoying now, is complete bull****. No one saw these profits coming. Not anyone in management.. If they had anticipated profits like this ...they wouldn't have given it to us!!

Now that the Dalpa administrators realize how much profit sharing costs the company, they (and you) are pulling out all the stops to find some way to give it back to them. Why?

Sink r8 05-29-2015 03:45 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1891659)
Those other guys stumbled onto profit sharing. To think they foresaw the insane profits Delta is enjoying now, is complete bull****. No one saw these profits coming. Not anyone in management.. If they had anticipated profits like this ...they wouldn't have given it to us!!

Huh, scuse me!? The Delta pilots of that period read the 1113 documents, our amended contract, and our W-2's, and we knew there were billions there, since we were giving them those billions. There wasn't any question in anyone's mind that the company would be VERY profitable. The problem many of us had is that we didn't know how soon, and how much we would get back. The guys that engineered/negotiated the PS have a claim to the credit, they own it. We gave them hell over it, in fact.

Were you here when the PS was negotiated by them, and funded by me and a few thousand guys I know?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands