Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 1894834)

By settling outside of C2015, the company has set a precedent for valuation on future scope violations. Isolating it from the contract at such a low amount works in their favor. They now have a benchmark for future scope violations as they ramp up the JVs.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1894839)

Can you tell us how many jobs were lost

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1894839)

and about what the value should have been?

Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 1894831)

$30 million is a dirt cheap solution when you put it that way.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1894839)

Can you tell us how many jobs were lost and about what the value should have been?

Originally Posted by Raging white (Post 1894903)

260 jobs, $392 million


But you'll just have to trust me on this, it will show our hand to the company if I show you the data.

Originally Posted by Hawaii50 (Post 1894846)

Don't take it personally. For some here it's much more about making ALPA/DALPA look bad than the issue itself. Whatever happens it''s too little too late and when we get a great TA they'll try and take credit for it instead of the people really doing the work for us. The agenda is discredit ALPA at every possible juncture.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1894827)

I guess I had no idea how the grievance process works. Who knew there was a reasonable chance a arbitrator might have ordered the entire shutdown of Delta's atlantic joint venture. Billions of dollars in revenue gone. Reservation canceled for ticket reservations numbering in the hundreds of thousands gone. A entire alliance shutdown! A probable loss in stock value in the billions. All because they came in at 47% instead of 48.5% on the EASK. Can you imagine the WSJ articles!

Originally Posted by White Cap (Post 1894407)

Typhoon Pilot, please stop with all your valid posts. They have no place on xenophobic message boards.