Details on Delta TA
06-04-2015 | 05:46 PM
#5571
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly.
Last edited by GunshipGuy; 06-04-2015 at 06:28 PM. Reason: Semantics. Originally worded as "...consider the PS funding to pay for it)"
06-04-2015 | 05:54 PM
#5572
ready for mo money
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Left Behind
what i heard while checking in this afternoon
7/3/3/3
2 more dc but taken from profit sharing
loss of 40 hours of sick
verification at 80 per year
no more oe bumps
no change to vacation or cq pay
no per diem increase
aint no way this piece of crap can possibly be our next cba. definitely no
7/3/3/3
2 more dc but taken from profit sharing
loss of 40 hours of sick
verification at 80 per year
no more oe bumps
no change to vacation or cq pay
no per diem increase
aint no way this piece of crap can possibly be our next cba. definitely no
06-04-2015 | 06:00 PM
#5573
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Someone quoted a rumor they said they got from APC (9/6/1/1 partially funded with PS cuts and concessions). The latest rumor over there is 8/6/3/3 (8/.25/3/3 if you consider the PS funding to pay for it); scope change regarding 76 seater, change to FO LCA OE trips, and sick leave change to mention the big stuff.
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly.
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly.
06-04-2015 | 06:02 PM
#5574
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: 767-400
what i heard while checking in this afternoon
7/3/3/3
2 more dc but taken from profit sharing
loss of 40 hours of sick
verification at 80 per year
no more oe bumps
no change to vacation or cq pay
no per diem increase
aint no way this piece of crap can possibly be our next cba. definitely no
7/3/3/3
2 more dc but taken from profit sharing
loss of 40 hours of sick
verification at 80 per year
no more oe bumps
no change to vacation or cq pay
no per diem increase
aint no way this piece of crap can possibly be our next cba. definitely no
06-04-2015 | 06:04 PM
#5575
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
And just like that, the pathetically inadequate JV grievance settlement is buried. An afterthought.
RA played Donatelli like a fiddle. Donatelli is playing us like a Stradivarius.
"World's best airline contract."
RA played Donatelli like a fiddle. Donatelli is playing us like a Stradivarius.
"World's best airline contract."
06-04-2015 | 06:07 PM
#5576
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 244
Likes: 7
Someone quoted a rumor they said they got from APC (9/6/1/1 partially funded with PS cuts and concessions). The latest rumor over there is 8/6/3/3 (8/.25/3/3 if you consider the PS funding to pay for it); scope change regarding 76 seater, change to FO LCA OE trips, and sick leave change to mention the big stuff.
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly.
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly.
06-04-2015 | 06:11 PM
#5577
Snake
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Every single thread gets hijacked by the same people.
I think the moderator is trying to manage an impossible situation, and vindicating the Delta MEC's unanimous decision to shut down their version of Hangar Talk. I never claimed, nor do I believe, that the current moderator of chitchat is supportive of DPA.
It's more like a 5-2 furball. And it's high school. The wackaloons over there would get banned in a week from APC.
06-04-2015 | 06:12 PM
#5578
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
We are always shocked at how small the raises are. Alpa will explain time value of money and tell us how this is the best offer we are going to get. There will be yelling in the crew rooms just like last time. It will pass just like it always does. It's the same thing everytime. I'm a no vote as always.
06-04-2015 | 06:15 PM
#5579
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Apparently this is what the LA reps meant when they referred to a "punch in the face."
It's pretty clear that when RA demanded an audience with the MEC, he told them they could either accept the scraps he offered now, or he would string out the process as long as he could.
And that's your sales pitch: TVMv2.0
I'm happy to string this mofo out.
It's pretty clear that when RA demanded an audience with the MEC, he told them they could either accept the scraps he offered now, or he would string out the process as long as he could.
And that's your sales pitch: TVMv2.0
I'm happy to string this mofo out.
06-04-2015 | 06:16 PM
#5580
Line Holder
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
