Details on Delta TA
06-07-2015 | 05:55 PM
#6071
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
06-07-2015 | 06:11 PM
#6073
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Many on this board have set themselves up by having ridiculous and unrealistic expectations. Even if it is a good TA, it couldn't possibly be enough to satisfy many here. For example, someone just floated the rumor of pay raises that amounts to AMR + 2%, and we retain most of the PS. While one can debate the merit of that and the rest, it amounts to 21.5% compounded over 3 years. Know anyone in your neighborhood getting that deal? I certainly wouldn't be crying about it too loud.
That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
06-07-2015 | 06:12 PM
#6074
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
No argument here. Just have a hard time understanding the logic of a few that we should take everything off the table at the start.
06-07-2015 | 06:14 PM
#6075
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Many on this board have set themselves up by having ridiculous and unrealistic expectations. Even if it is a good TA, it couldn't possibly be enough to satisfy many here. For example, someone just floated the rumor of pay raises that amounts to AMR + 2%, and we retain most of the PS. While one can debate the merit of that and the rest, it amounts to 21.5% compounded over 3 years. Know anyone in your neighborhood getting that deal? I certainly wouldn't be crying about it too loud.
That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
06-07-2015 | 06:16 PM
#6077
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 112
Many on this board have set themselves up by having ridiculous and unrealistic expectations. Even if it is a good TA, it couldn't possibly be enough to satisfy many here. For example, someone just floated the rumor of pay raises that amounts to AMR + 2%, and we retain most of the PS. While one can debate the merit of that and the rest, it amounts to 21.5% compounded over 3 years. Know anyone in your neighborhood getting that deal? I certainly wouldn't be crying about it too loud.
That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
Please tell me you're not in any way representing me enroute to an "historic contract." In what way would AMR +2, funded by PS givebacks (you said "most") be historic...especially with even a third of the rumored non-monetary concessions? It would be the best in history*?
*history defined as the last ~15 years...or since September 11th...or during and around the greatest global financial disaster since the great depression
06-07-2015 | 06:17 PM
#6078
Banned
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Either they directed the NC to TA or the NC went rogue and went out on their own. Which do you think is likely?
They conceptually gave the NC the green light during the last special MEC meeting. If they reject it now, it means the majority have changed their minds. What does that say?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
