![]() |
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 1898469)
Good luck guys. Looking forward to seeing what the TA really looks like. I'll add this last point. When we (UAL/CAL) had our "TA"... there were all kind of rumors abound.
We too (the rank and file/message board groupies) were constantly told to "not believe the rumors.. wait and see before you judge". Well, I agree that you should "wait and see before voting NO".. but, the [negative] rumors almost ALL turned out to be true. And by then, it was too late~ Always Motch PS> If your MEC turns it down, will you still 'see' what it was? Seems like you will if your MEC meeting tomorrow is open, and the TA is being discussed. All the rumors were right last time....I'm sure they are close this time around as well. |
Truth in advertising to start. I'm a new hire military retiree, so I know I have a limited knowledge base. But here goes...
1st point. For many years, my father ran a paper mill that was non-union, in an industry that is nearly ALL union. They stayed had a very good profit-sharing program. As a result, they consistently performed FAR better than industry average. The employees would do nearly anything to ensure the mill keep running and making money, because they knew it meant more money in their pocket. It's hard to quantify, but I'm willing to bet that if PS is significantly reduced, the incentive among all employees to maximize profit diminishes, and profits go down. The skin you have in the game, the harder you work. 2nd point. Yes profits will fluctuate up and down. If another 2008 downturn occurs, PS may go to zero. In that same scenario, history shows that the Company will come to the table and ask/demand pay cuts to weather the storm. In the past, when we took pay rate cuts, how many years after profits returned did it take to get the pay rates back? In those negotiations, what other concessions did the Company ask for in return? With PS, the "pay increase" is immediate when profits return and it costs nothing in return. Just some thoughts, looking forward to seeing the TA. |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1898419)
All the things you cite are NOT part of the steps that Dalpa went thru to achieve C2001. They certainly influenced the outcome but were not part of the process.
I agree that the factors you cite for C2015 are influencing any deal. I guess I just feel we can achieve a much better deal than what is rumored to be in this TA. If this comes down to a vote of the membership, I have not decided how I will vote because I have no facts to base that decision on. I do NOT go ready, fire, aim. Frankly, I don't know what my BATNA is but I will know it when I see it. On another note, if you don't feel like I'm a Delta Pilot, thats on you. I've flown with at least one and had one or two on my jumpseat. Denny You're not going to get anything better from the NMB unless you make it clear to them that you have been reasonable and bargaining in good faith from the beginning. Acting prematurely not only reduces what is possible in two-way deals, but improves the company's position in mediation. Tomorrow we get actual numbers, and a much clearer choice. |
Originally Posted by waldo135
(Post 1898504)
Truth in advertising to start. I'm a new hire military retiree, so I know I have a limited knowledge base. But here goes...
1st point. For many years, my father ran a paper mill that was non-union, in an industry that is nearly ALL union. They stayed had a very good profit-sharing program. As a result, they consistently performed FAR better than industry average. The employees would do nearly anything to ensure the mill keep running and making money, because they knew it meant more money in their pocket. It's hard to quantify, but I'm willing to bet that if PS is significantly reduced, the incentive among all employees to maximize profit diminishes, and profits go down. The skin you have in the game, the harder you work. 2nd point. Yes profits will fluctuate up and down. If another 2008 downturn occurs, PS may go to zero. In that same scenario, history shows that the Company will come to the table and ask/demand pay cuts to weather the storm. In the past, when we took pay rate cuts, how many years after profits returned did it take to get the pay rates back? In those negotiations, what other concessions did the Company ask for in return? With PS, the "pay increase" is immediate when profits return and it costs nothing in return. Just some thoughts, looking forward to seeing the TA. As to your second point, the only way we see concessions is if we are facing bankruptcy. Smaller (or no) profits don't result in concessions, but they do result in immediate loss of profit sharing income. If we are facing (or in) bankruptcy, I'd much prefer our concession discussion start from a baseline of higher wages. |
Another note about profit sharing in terms of what it's worth. A lot of the initiatives Delta had when coming out of BK received a good chunk of money up until this point (billion dollar terminals, billion dollar customer support training for frontline employees, paying down debt- which could soon hit zero and be a massive reduction in interest payments, etc). The debt and misc items that needed to be serviced will drop dramatically, increasing profits.
Some (including our union) have been pushing a campaign of "at risk" profit sharing with the notion we should discount it for so called "sure thing pay" (there is no such thing btw). It may well be the other way around....without the drag of above mentioned items, profits may be ready for a big leap into the stratosphere. $1 profit sharing today may actually be worth $5 tomorrow. Yet we've got folks trying to sell it at a discount. What will they say 2 years from now when everybody realizes we got snookered? "We didn't see profits getting to that level and your union got you a big win (insert carefully cultivated data that leaves opposing data out). |
Originally Posted by Splash
(Post 1898435)
For the sake of argument, let's assume the rumors about 23.G are true.
How many lines? Since it doesn't decrease the number of pilots flying, what is the net effect on staffing? How will changes to OE schedules be handled? I'm referring to situations where a pilot needs extra training before OE, or further OE. Situations where a simulator breaks, sick leave, or needs more OE time. This looks like a time when we should keep our powder dry until we see the exact terms of the agreement before we conclude it is a serious hit. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1898503)
We had the exact same thing happen during our last contract C2012. We were told all the rumors were put out by management to rile us up.....have patience.....wait for the TA.......MEC will put it out....settle down.......etc.
All the rumors were right last time....I'm sure they are close this time around as well. I want to say publicly I am very thankful for those individuals willing to stand up for what they believe in and diligently represent this pilot group- even at the cost of having cheap shots thrown their way by anonymous union insiders who are obviously lacking in fortitude or character. If 2012 is any measure, we know the powerful insiders will try to drag any that disagree with them through the mud in an attempt to diminish credibility. When I read the well articulated, signed letters from C1 and C20 I feel truth and it gives me hope. When I read the unsigned letter from unknowns in our union it smells heavily of BS. |
Originally Posted by EdGrimley
(Post 1898528)
rush to a vote.
|
Originally Posted by MOTOJOE
(Post 1898297)
Boatbuilder is right! Lock in the PS PERCENTAGE NOW. plus our % pay raise. RA is gone after this yr. he said it himself. Who knows which way this ship will go after him?
What if. What if. What if. You can play that all day long. Life is rife with risk. RA could have a stroke tomorrow, you could have an heart attack this afternoon. Just getting out of bed is risky, but we do it every day. We are paid as professional aviators to manage risk. Nice try on the attempts to appeal to that conditioned nature of our professional lives. My favorite is labeling profit sharing to the negative connotative term "at risk pay." Industrial psychology at its best. I reject that term and prefer the much more appropriate and accurate variable pay. |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1898527)
It abrogates seniority. Plain and simple. Questions?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands