![]() |
Why did we give up anything in his contract?
|
Originally Posted by The Walrus
(Post 1900800)
Just curious. How would they investigate past sick usage?
|
Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
(Post 1900737)
I know that and so does he, our union shutdown our forum. So they come here, why can't we have this discussion on our dalpa forum? Where's the transparency?
For the record, repeating publicly that "if we don't take this deal we are iced" damages our cause far worse than releasing survey results that by all accounts asked many times over what this TA proposes. The behavior of our union leadership is shady, opaque and unprofessional. The information being disseminated is tilted, lacking in accuracy and is only promoting one side of the equation. There may be legal implications to this. |
Originally Posted by TCMC17RES
(Post 1900814)
Statement:
5.74% of variable compensation converted to fixed compensation in the form of hourly pay rates, assuming the Company achieves PTIX of $6.0+ billion every year o This impact is reduced if PTIX is less than $6 billion Please back me up on my napkin math... Last year I earned a PS bonus at 16.58% on 4.5B If I turn this into an equation we can find the %rate (x) earned per B$ profit: 2.5X + 2(4.5-2.5)X = 16.58 2.5X + 4X = 16.58 6.5X = 16.58 X = 2.55 %/B$ This is the rate that we earned last year per billion profit @10% return With this TA we give up (6.0-2.5) = 3.5X = 8.9% How does Alpa come up with 5.74%? |
Originally Posted by rahc
(Post 1900604)
I find it funny how the Delta MEC is deleting every single negative post on their FB page now.
|
Originally Posted by MOTOJOE
(Post 1900820)
Professor, In th sick part of the TA. It says 365 rolling look back for more than 15 days out sick for verification. So my understanding is compared to c2012 it doesn't look back to just the sick yr June 1st to jun 1st? It constantly looks back 365 days?
|
Originally Posted by Professor
(Post 1900799)
You should. The vote will be in open session so you sure will. And absolutely not a bad question. The process is a bit foreign to most of us.
Denny |
Originally Posted by Professor
(Post 1900801)
For those interested the Strategic Planning committee slides are available on the DALPA website.
Lots of good info in it. If there are questions please post them here, call your reps or email/call a P2P rep. Thanks. https://dal.alpa.org/DesktopModules/...d=0&TabId=2593 http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/me...creen-shot.jpg |
Originally Posted by Maddog Heaven
(Post 1900812)
Concessions....Dr. Seuss
Would you take concessions here and there? Would you take them anywhere? I would not could not here or there. I would not take them anywhere Would you could you with Vaseline? Or with a beer? Plus Dramamine? I would not could not with Vaseline. Nor with a beer. And Dramamine. I do not like concessions, Mike, you see. Go back to the table. Until then, leave me be. Denny |
Originally Posted by TCMC17RES
(Post 1900814)
Statement:
5.74% of variable compensation converted to fixed compensation in the form of hourly pay rates, assuming the Company achieves PTIX of $6.0+ billion every year o This impact is reduced if PTIX is less than $6 billion Please back me up on my napkin math... Last year I earned a PS bonus at 16.58% on 4.5B If I turn this into an equation we can find the %rate (x) earned per B$ profit: 2.5X + 2(4.5-2.5)X = 16.58 2.5X + 4X = 16.58 6.5X = 16.58 X = 2.55 %/B$ This is the rate that we earned last year per billion profit @10% return With this TA we give up (6.0-2.5) = 3.5X = 8.9% How does Alpa come up with 5.74%? In addition to what Sailing posted, I think some of the difference you're coming up with might be due to the fact that the new 10% piece (2.5B-6B) is multiplied off of a rate 14ish% higher than the current rates. Other than that someone else will have to correct it. I have heard the reps challenge some of the slides/assumptions. The 5.74% isn't one that has been challenged. Btw the NC Q&A is finished.... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands