![]() |
Originally Posted by Professor
(Post 1900293)
GZSG,
Missed you buddy. I think that is your opinion. And as your opinion is valid. The reality is that at least in pay this TA does a few things:
Those are just facts. You may not like them. Just putting them out there for you and others. If you are happy hitting 11 year old rates with no inflation, vote yes. We magically used block hours to get management in balance and lose hundreds of Widebody jobs. For this we got a nickel in per diem. We screwed all the first officers by taking away their ability to bid all available trips. For this we got 15 minutes of vacation. This TA has no defense. There was no negotiation, just complete surrender. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1900308)
Radial TSquare! Awesome!
Let's send it back! And I am so glad that ya'll are still in love with the "productivity" pay argument. Them pigeons are coming home to roost now ain't they? It's been idiocy for years and it is even more so now. Enjoy, and congratulations to the 200 guys that are at the top of the heap. NY guys: Write to Tom and Chris. I just did and got an immediate response. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1900299)
So what? Why don't you tell us exactly how long we should have "held out" or stalled the process. Time means bupkus.
We traded a dollar for .98 cents and a pat on the head. |
Is SEA still not a hub and is LAX carved out wrt the Alaska Marketing Agreement?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1900316)
Early is great if you get a fair deal.
We traded a dollar for .98 cents and a pat on the head. |
Originally Posted by MikeF16
(Post 1900306)
Was there a listing of all the virtual bases and planes that go with them?
Virtual Base MOU: - Can be 6 months per position per base - Must be in the lower 48 - Can not be in an existing pilot base Pilots bid in via system wide AE, and have to already be qual'd in the position. Positive Space travel to from the base at the beginning and end of the bid period. Ocean Crossing (see my post above regarding the PWA definition of Ocean Crossing in 2.A.182) is prohibited on first leg of rotation from virtual base and from existing pilot base. As a local ATL guy, I'm not sure if I'm thrilled about this one. If I lived in one of the cities where they want to run these things (MCO, BOS, LAS and DFW were being tossed around...) I might think differently. Supposedly the "time" will have to be pulled from the bases where the pilots come...so if all SEA7ERB's take the LAS7ERB slots, it supposedly would only be a drawdown in SEA and not the other ER bases just as a hypothetical. Obviously there would be a mix of guys coming from all over. |
Originally Posted by 300SMK
(Post 1900317)
Is SEA still not a hub and is LAX carved out wrt the Alaska Marketing Agreement?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by GenX
(Post 1900304)
That's productive. :rolleyes: Is it possible to discuss the issues without all the hyperbole and poo throwing? |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1900314)
A 50% pay cut requires a 100% pay increase to get to even.
If you are happy hitting 11 year old rates with no inflation, vote yes. We magically used block hours to get management in balance and lose hundreds of Widebody jobs. For this we got a nickel in per diem. We screwed all the first officers by taking away their ability to bid all available trips. For this we got 15 minutes of vacation. This TA has no defense. There was no negotiation, just complete surrender. One dragon at a time. Pay. If you were fNW is actually more than inflation adjusted. On average you would be up 21% from high watermark pay rates. fDelta you are up about 3% from c2k without profit sharing. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1900316)
Early is great if you get a fair deal.
We traded a dollar for .98 cents and a pat on the head. Please show the numbers for your dollar to 98 cent conversion. I sat through the entire presentation yesterday. While the pay/profit sharing is not eye-watering, it is disingenuous to make that claim....unless you can show the math. Yes, the TA trades several QOL items that I'm not sure we want to entertain (as an FO, the repercussions of 23G5 for all but the most senior FO's is the top of the list for me) BUT I was left with no doubt that we do come out ahead financially under the TA, and it isn't an insignificant amount. I'm doing what I can to learn as much about the deal as I can, so I will be prepared to make a decision based on facts (not emotion or rhetoric) IF the reps even send it out. This should be quite a show this afternoon. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:09 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands