Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

slowplay 06-19-2015 03:26 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1910137)

The results actually prove I was spot on about c2012, and you and Alfa were wrong.

LOL. I forgot, Auburn math...:D

forgot to bid 06-19-2015 03:31 PM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 1910142)
LOL. I forgot, Auburn math...:D

What's the current ratio?

Carl Spackler 06-19-2015 03:34 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1910147)
What's the current ratio?

Slowplay is a drive-by bomb thrower. The minute you start to pick him apart, he'll just step on the gas and drive away.

Carl

georgetg 06-19-2015 03:53 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1910065)
The C2012 MBH vs DBH ratio was a concession. Plain and simple.

This builds on it, slightly better, but notice they didn’t put a baseline when they said “1.81 means that mainline must grow 50 aircraft.” We have 124 more jets to be delivered plus 60 added in this PWA. How does a 184 aircraft only become a 50 jet growth? By parking 134 jets.

What’s that? The 88 fleet (116 jets) and then some.

We are forever going to be buying and retiring aircraft, what they’re doing is using that natural business process to add larger regional jets to Delta Connection and continue making outsourcing profitable.

It wasn't a concession, it just didn't do what it purported to do...

Back in C2012 (pre 717) the actual MBH to RBH ratio was 1.19:1, that is for every Regional Block hour, there were 1.19 Mainline Block Hours. Remember that was before drawing down the 50 seaters and before adding the 717 and 739.

Maybe someone from ALPA can chime in with our current MBH to RBH ratio, It certainly will be higher than 1.19:1.

Just for kicks, considering a 25% reduction in DCI (approx 600 to 450 Rjs) and flat mainline Block Hours since C2012 would make our current ratio 1.58 (1.19:0.75)

Or flat RJ Block Hours since C2012 and a 30% mainline growth in block hours as slowplay claims would make the current ratio 1.54.

If indeed DCI shrunk by a bunch and mainline increased by 30% our current MBH to RBH ratio ought to be much higher.

How much "wiggle room" does the company get with the 1.81:1 ratio if we keep adding jets and DCI is being reduced?

Cheers
George

newKnow 06-19-2015 04:20 PM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 1909230)
too.........many..........threads..........to..... .....keep...........track.........of

Yeah. It's getting to the point where I can't find anything. :confused:

forgot to bid 06-19-2015 04:31 PM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1910161)
It wasn't a concession, it just didn't do what it purported to do...

Back in C2012 (pre 717) the actual MBH to RBH ratio was 1.19:1, that is for every Regional Block hour, there were 1.19 Mainline Block Hours. Remember that was before drawing down the 50 seaters and before adding the 717 and 739.

Maybe someone from ALPA can chime in with our current MBH to RBH ratio, It certainly will be higher than 1.19:1.

Just for kicks, considering a 25% reduction in DCI (approx 600 to 450 Rjs) and flat mainline Block Hours since C2012 would make our current ratio 1.58 (1.19:0.75)

Or flat RJ Block Hours since C2012 and a 30% mainline growth in block hours as slowplay claims would make the current ratio 1.54.

If indeed DCI shrunk by a bunch and mainline increased by 30% our current MBH to RBH ratio ought to be much higher.

How much "wiggle room" does the company get with the 1.81:1 ratio if we keep adding jets and DCI is being reduced?

Cheers
George

The concession to me was getting rid of the 767 mainline fleet number and the requirement that any 76-seat growth come at the expense of 70-seaters with the max still being 255 jumbo RJs. The proponents of C2012 said it was a gain because the company could pump then dump, but that cost alone would make it a nonstarter not to mention they'd still end up with 255 RJs max. C2012 allowed them to pump while dumping.

That's why I believe it was a concession.

To drop an analogy on this thought, say a Delta pilot and an RJ pilot walk into a bar together. The bartender pours them two free beers of nearly the same size. Maybe the Delta pilot's is larger by a ratio of say, 1.19, but who is counting?

Now before they drink a sip of it the Bartender looks at the Delta pilot and says, if you buy his dinner, I'll make sure you have twice as much beer as he does. Delta pilot says, hell yeah, deal. And bartender reaches over to the RJ pilots beer, pours half of it out, and then gives him his dinner and turns to the Delta pilot and says that'll be $10.

Delta pilot objects. You didn't give me more beer? Nope. But you've got twice as much as he does and that was the deal. That's what that ratio was set at. Take away from DCI, but mainline was not required to have growth. Of course it was sold as 88 airplane growth, but that's not what the ratio required. It was probably more like 20. Out of 580 jets.

Still, this ratio ain't nothing compared to the issues TA2015 presents.

forgot to bid 06-19-2015 04:32 PM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1910190)
Yeah. It's getting to the point where I can't find anything. :confused:

I get that too and don't like it.

But then I realized it's easier to find C66 council letters if it has a dedicated thread.

So it has it's advantages. Think of it as we're on a mission to create as many threads as Delta has manuals. :(:confused:

newKnow 06-19-2015 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1910202)
I get that too and don't like it.

But then I realized it's easier to find C66 council letters if it has a dedicated thread.

So it has it's advantages. Think of it as we're on a mission to create as many threads as Delta has manuals. :(:confused:

No worries. I created a thread, or three on the TA, too. :D


It's not your fault. Chit chat is much worse.

forgot to bid 06-19-2015 04:36 PM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1910206)
No worries. I created a thread, or three on the TA, too. :D


It's not your fault. Chit chat is much worse.

I might have 3 or 4 under my belt. :D I love having our own sub forum. :D

scambo1 06-19-2015 05:12 PM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1910161)
It wasn't a concession, it just didn't do what it purported to do...

Back in C2012 (pre 717) the actual MBH to RBH ratio was 1.19:1, that is for every Regional Block hour, there were 1.19 Mainline Block Hours. Remember that was before drawing down the 50 seaters and before adding the 717 and 739.

Maybe someone from ALPA can chime in with our current MBH to RBH ratio, It certainly will be higher than 1.19:1.

Just for kicks, considering a 25% reduction in DCI (approx 600 to 450 Rjs) and flat mainline Block Hours since C2012 would make our current ratio 1.58 (1.19:0.75)

Or flat RJ Block Hours since C2012 and a 30% mainline growth in block hours as slowplay claims would make the current ratio 1.54.

If indeed DCI shrunk by a bunch and mainline increased by 30% our current MBH to RBH ratio ought to be much higher.

How much "wiggle room" does the company get with the 1.81:1 ratio if we keep adding jets and DCI is being reduced?

Cheers
George

Now George throw in your calculus using increased RJ stage length.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands