Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
LAX Based Grassroot Anti TA Movement >

LAX Based Grassroot Anti TA Movement


Notices

LAX Based Grassroot Anti TA Movement

Old 06-14-2015 | 06:36 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Awesome!!

And what happens when we reject this TA?

No concessions and increasing profit sharing.

Management needs this deal much more than we do.

Let's get a fair deal that is a win for the Delta pilots and Delta management.
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 06:48 AM
  #2  
Reserve Sucks
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

I have no dog in this fight as well but this seems like a BIIIIIIIGGGGGG POS! The sick leave policy scares the hell out of me. They are robbing Peter to pay Paul in the pay raise category. I really don't see any real gains in this TA. For all of you DAL pilots and the rest of us industry pukes please vote no.
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:01 AM
  #3  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

The email needs to add to the LCA trip pull fiasco.

It won't just effect the pilots who attempt to bid with LCA, more importantly, it will effect EVERY FO on the list because an equal number of pilots who currently hold a line will now be on reserve as the amount of flying to award is reduced by 75% of the trips the LCA bid.

How many LCA do we have total at Delta? Multiply that by .75 and you have the total number of FO's who currently hold lines who will be on reserve under C2015.
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:08 AM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
The email needs to add to the LCA trip pull fiasco.

It won't just effect the pilots who attempt to bid with LCA, more importantly, it will effect EVERY FO on the list because an equal number of pilots who currently hold a line will now be on reserve as the amount of flying to award is reduced by 75% of the trips the LCA bid.

How many LCA do we have total at Delta? Multiply that by .75 and you have the total number of FO's who currently hold lines who will be on reserve under C2015.


From what I understand this is just the start.

Scoop
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:17 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
From what I understand this is just the start.

Scoop
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please. Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen? What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?

Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO.
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:28 AM
  #6  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please. Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen? What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?

Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO.


Slow,

I agree 100% with you. The more objective and fact based the better for everyone.

That is why I am so disappointed in the MEC. I have heard a few guys have said "We felt the Pilots should have a vote on this."

Well that would be great if they presented both the good and the bad, let the No voters provide counterpoints at the road shows etc. In other words share information, answer questions, and stop selling it like a bunch of used car salesmen.

I would have a lot more respect for DALPA if they just said something like:

Here it is guys, it has some good thing, some bad things, vote what you think is best.

Instead we get - This is awesome if you don't vote yes the evil NMB will come in the night and take your first born type of tactics.

My 2 cents - Scoop

OBTW - I voted yes open C2012 but will be voting NO shortly.
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:38 AM
  #7  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please. Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen? What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?

Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO.
Slow, you do understand that the EASK is a MINIMUM, right? If we replace a 767 with an A330, we simply are operating more seats on DL metal, we move UP in the percentages, and by the way, the company has been BELOW THE CONTRACTUAL MINIMUM for the past 4 years!

There is NO downside to keeping our EASK language!

NONE!

Stop trying to spin it as if we have to maintain a 50% ratio, that is a MINIMUM. Heck, we could fly 100% of our JV EASK! There is NOTHING that says we can -only- fly 50%, except Richard wants us to fly as little as possible, witness the JV Grievance we just WON!
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:39 AM
  #8  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please.
And if you want to be successful in having the MEC administration win in cramming this down pilots' throats, you'll have to do better than, "please." The FACT is that the change from EASK's to block hours specifically allows it to happen. It also allows all future growth to occur with our JV partners by them up gauging to A380's to handle the passenger growth...while we remain with 757's and 737-900ER's. Under this scenario of A380's for the Euro's and narrow bodies for Delta pilots, Delta will be in balance because the JV language now only cares about aircraft block hours...REGARDLESS of aircraft type or number of seats.

Originally Posted by slowplay
Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen?
There is nothing in writing about Alitalia leaving. Nothing. Alitalia has only said they intend to leave in 2017.

Originally Posted by slowplay
What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?
Where does it say in this TA that the company will do that?

Originally Posted by slowplay
Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO.
The facts are in the actual TA language. Our challenge will be to refute the falsehoods told by the MEC administration during the road shows as they attempt to deflect from the facts in the TA language. That's why I think attending road shows are a waste of time except to maybe picket them outside. Picketing outside would allow for passing out leaflets showing the actual TA language as all the fact-based evidence you need to vote NO.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:45 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please. Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen? What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?

Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO.
Give us the facts here. Does switching to block hours put management back into compliance immediately?
Reply
Old 06-14-2015 | 07:50 AM
  #10  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Give us the facts here. Does switching to block hours put management back into compliance immediately?
It does. That's not arguable. Changing the measuring metric to block hours removes all past or future violations that were EASK based.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DGFlyer03
American
47
07-28-2014 12:12 PM
Yazzoo
Regional
17
01-28-2014 08:22 PM
SpreadEagle
SkyWest
24
04-13-2013 08:12 AM
myoface
Major
2
09-01-2007 08:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices