Delta Air Lines - Looks To Have...
07-14-2015 | 04:59 PM
#61
The Brown Dot +1
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
07-14-2015 | 05:16 PM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Let's get this right. We don't need to be in a rush to put a little more lipstick on and call it OK. 1.E.9. needs to be a full MEC decision at the least, preferably MEMRAT. Scope needs to be enforceable and have consequential penalties, not just grieve it later. Small aircraft scope should let the RJ operators wither. The Embraer fleet can all come to mainline E170 through E195. Get the flying back first, then address the pay. Now is the time because those pilots can be absorbed with the current need.
07-14-2015 | 05:45 PM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
07-14-2015 | 05:50 PM
#65
The Brown Dot +1
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
The meltdown...hmmmm.
DALPA didn't negotiate FOR the the pilots.
Since you are the self appointed rock thrower, maybe you can explain how N/A15 provided better protection, in your opinion.
07-14-2015 | 06:01 PM
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
I answered your question many times. Yet somehow you accuse me of anger and vitriol.
The meltdown...hmmmm.
DALPA didn't negotiate FOR the the pilots.
Since you are the self appointed rock thrower, maybe you can explain how N/A15 provided better protection, in your opinion.
The meltdown...hmmmm.
DALPA didn't negotiate FOR the the pilots.
Since you are the self appointed rock thrower, maybe you can explain how N/A15 provided better protection, in your opinion.
If we start losing flights when AF/KLM starts parking airframes, there will be a meltdown on here.
07-14-2015 | 06:02 PM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Let's get this right. We don't need to be in a rush to put a little more lipstick on and call it OK. 1.E.9. needs to be a full MEC decision at the least, preferably MEMRAT. Scope needs to be enforceable and have consequential penalties, not just grieve it later. Small aircraft scope should let the RJ operators wither. The Embraer fleet can all come to mainline E170 through E195. Get the flying back first, then address the pay. Now is the time because those pilots can be absorbed with the current need.
07-14-2015 | 06:05 PM
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Hello? Is this thing on? (tap tap tap) Both metrics! Right now we have 2 or 3 new JVs being written. Get the language right. Protect our flying. The upside or expansion of the JV as a revenue tool is the issue.
The penalty needs to be monetarily untenable to the side violating. If we are seen as partners then this is not an unrealistic request. More ownership in the form of stock awards comes to mind. An increase in profit sharing to offset outsourcing would be good.
The penalty needs to be monetarily untenable to the side violating. If we are seen as partners then this is not an unrealistic request. More ownership in the form of stock awards comes to mind. An increase in profit sharing to offset outsourcing would be good.
07-14-2015 | 06:08 PM
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
What PENALTY do you propose? And how are you going to force management to sign on to it?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
