DPA Chairman?
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: CA
#33
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: 320A
I agree for me it wasn't so much about the money in this TA,it was all the little things as to why I voted no.How many QOL improvements can you cite in TA 1?
#38
crewdawg52 is correct. Alpa aeromedical is now public to any airline group that pays in. It is not exclusive to ALPA.
TEN
#39
Hey weird dude that doesn't work here (who I have a feeling is typing from Carl's basement),
Where did I mention concessions? I said I was willing to monetize a portion of profit sharing for the right price or keep status quo and collect my profit sharing as is.
Since you seem so intent on inserting yourself in our discussion and making accusations how about a little background on you? I'm an LA ER guy.
Where did I mention concessions? I said I was willing to monetize a portion of profit sharing for the right price or keep status quo and collect my profit sharing as is.
Since you seem so intent on inserting yourself in our discussion and making accusations how about a little background on you? I'm an LA ER guy.
You have to be honest, the way the 1st TA had it you would have only made 8/.025/3/3 after monetizing PS. The pay rates were similar to C2012. Was that the right price?? For me, No Bueno.
TEN
#40
I agree but lets first set our pay raises and wrap this TA2 or TA3 up. After the storms have settled, lets monetize PS.
You have to be honest, the way the 1st TA had it you would have only made 8/.025/3/3 after monetizing PS. The pay rates were similar to C2012. Was that the right price?? For me, No Bueno.
TEN
You have to be honest, the way the 1st TA had it you would have only made 8/.025/3/3 after monetizing PS. The pay rates were similar to C2012. Was that the right price?? For me, No Bueno.
TEN
Like you said, no question the price for monetizing profit sharing needed to be much higher than we saw.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






