Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Poll: Who wanted a TA more? >

Poll: Who wanted a TA more?

Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Who is the most desperate to get a TA?
DAL
58
47.93%
DALPA/C44
55
45.45%
Pilots
8
6.61%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Who wanted a TA more?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2015 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
1. Staffing issue is solved. 717 deliveries end in December, no E-190's so hiring drops to about 40 per month. IOE trip drops will be cut by 60-70% just on that alone.
2. Why would they care?
3. They are going to give the other employees big raises soon and cut their profit sharing, so only 12,000 employees get huge profit sharing checks. Our contract does not cover the other employees.

What other leverage do you have?

We already know Bartels tried to blame Anderson for the failed TA and Anderson stuck it right back in his face. Anderson is done with this MEC until the witch hunts/lunacy ends; that alone gets you well into 2016. He told the MEC to strap in for the long haul which is what set Bartels to getting red faced. He needs the money to pay off that expensive house in San Diego. Woops.
Anderson is leaving in January and he said he wanted an agreement before departure.

Apparently E190s were not important to the business plan. The sim closure for construction is the reason hiring was slowed.

Do you just like to lie or is it all you know how to do?
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 01:39 PM
  #12  
Jughead135's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 2
From: Hates Commuting
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
3. They are going to give the other employees big raises soon and cut their profit sharing, so only 12,000 employees get huge profit sharing checks. Our contract does not cover the other employees.
Wrong.

.........
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 01:40 PM
  #13  
forgot to bid's Avatar
Thread Starter
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
1. Staffing issue is solved. 717 deliveries end in December, no E-190's so hiring drops to about 40 per month. IOE trip drops will be cut by 60-70% just on that alone.
2. Why would they care?
3. They are going to give the other employees big raises soon and cut their profit sharing, so only 12,000 employees get huge profit sharing checks. Our contract does not cover the other employees.

What other leverage do you have?

We already know Bartels tried to blame Anderson for the failed TA and Anderson stuck it right back in his face. Anderson is done with this MEC until the witch hunts/lunacy ends; that alone gets you well into 2016. He told the MEC to strap in for the long haul which is what set Bartels to getting red faced. He needs the money to pay off that expensive house in San Diego. Woops.
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 02:08 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 355
Likes: 14
From: 75/76, C-5
Default

Why are people so hung up on this TA needing to pass for 190's to show up? Can't we already have them and wouldn't they pay even less now than if we passed TA1??

Mongo
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 02:55 PM
  #15  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
1. Staffing issue is solved. 717 deliveries end in December, no E-190's so hiring drops to about 40 per month. IOE trip drops will be cut by 60-70% just on that alone.
2. Why would they care?
3. They are going to give the other employees big raises soon and cut their profit sharing, so only 12,000 employees get huge profit sharing checks. Our contract does not cover the other employees.

What other leverage do you have?

We already know Bartels tried to blame Anderson for the failed TA and Anderson stuck it right back in his face. Anderson is done with this MEC until the witch hunts/lunacy ends; that alone gets you well into 2016. He told the MEC to strap in for the long haul which is what set Bartels to getting red faced. He needs the money to pay off that expensive house in San Diego. Woops.

1.) Staffing issue solved? Ok. How many more 737's are still to be delivered? Do you see the open time for 767 FO's that is still out there? Finally, I heard the hiring was down because of some sims being down, NOT because the 190's aren't coming.

2.) The most junior captain is 10,600 with tons of airplanes to be delivered, accelerating retirements, and many of the FO's I fly with making twice as much as me in the summer months. They care.

3.) Our contract does cover other employees.

SECTION 3.I (page 3-14) of our current K:
Profit Sharing Plan

Eligibility Pilot and non-pilot employees of the Company generally, except for management employees covered by incentive compensation plans
Anderson is done with this MEC, because the old MEC Chairman had to resign, because of the abject failure of the TA, he was unable to continue leading the pilot group. It will take a little time for the new MEC Chairman to get his house in order. 2016 is fine with me.

The other things you say about Bartells is unprofessional and unresponsive. For you to act like Anderson is treading us as pilots like petulant children is ridiculous. Reminds me of how the TA was presented to us.


Are you in the communications department with DALPA?
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 05:00 PM
  #16  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Bananie is Parker? That explains a lot.
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 05:39 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead135
Wrong.

.........
I think he has it right on. Why do you disagree? I expect the non-contract folks to get a decent pay raise very shortly, and converting their profit sharing while retaining ours is just a math exercise. They could easily do it.
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 05:47 PM
  #18  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,253
Likes: 96
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
1. Staffing issue is solved. 717 deliveries end in December, no E-190's so hiring drops to about 40 per month. IOE trip drops will be cut by 60-70% just on that alone.
2. Why would they care?
3. They are going to give the other employees big raises soon and cut their profit sharing, so only 12,000 employees get huge profit sharing checks. Our contract does not cover the other employees.

What other leverage do you have?

We already know Bartels tried to blame Anderson for the failed TA and Anderson stuck it right back in his face. Anderson is done with this MEC until the witch hunts/lunacy ends; that alone gets you well into 2016. He told the MEC to strap in for the long haul which is what set Bartels to getting red faced. He needs the money to pay off that expensive house in San Diego. Woops.


I have some news for you - the staffing issues have not even really kicked in yet.
We have been hiring to mostly accommodate the increase in NBs with a trickle of retirements. This results in little or no second and third order effects.

Once the flood, and yes I mean flood, of retirements kick in we will be hiring to replace retirees, new WBs, and new NB's.

The second and third order affects of the retirements off the top alone will be quite substantial. Add to that the new 330s, 350s, 321's and you have got a serious training burden.

Why do you think the company wanted this whole issue dealt with now? They are looking ahead. DALPA was apparently very concerned with the view via the rear-view mirror.

Scoop
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 05:48 PM
  #19  
forgot to bid's Avatar
Thread Starter
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
I think he has it right on. Why do you disagree? I expect the non-contract folks to get a decent pay raise very shortly, and converting their profit sharing while retaining ours is just a math exercise. They could easily do it.
And it's be a great weapon for the iam to use to win the next vote. So if DAL is playing chess and not dalpa checkers, they'll probably hold off on encouraging a yes vote with the FAs until they can pass the blame on to someone else... like the pilots.
Reply
Old 09-08-2015 | 05:56 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
And it's be a great weapon for the iam to use to win the next vote. So if DAL is playing chess and not dalpa checkers, they'll probably hold off on encouraging a yes vote with the FAs until they can pass the blame on to someone else... like the pilots.
The PS conversion was a no brainer. We should be demanding that the MEC negotiate that change, NOT the other way around. We always come out even or better with less risk. Anyone who does not understand that does not understand how the conversion worked. Call it 8 3 3 with a conversion if you like, but there's NO reason we should not want that conversion. Same for the other employees.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Military
10
01-26-2011 06:31 PM
taymor1234
Hiring News
0
12-18-2010 06:30 PM
Joachim
Hangar Talk
12
01-02-2010 11:41 AM
CoastalFlyer
Hiring News
5
04-02-2009 02:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices