Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Poll: Who wanted a TA more? >

Poll: Who wanted a TA more?

Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Who is the most desperate to get a TA?
DAL
58
47.93%
DALPA/C44
55
45.45%
Pilots
8
6.61%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Who wanted a TA more?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2015 | 06:49 AM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 43
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Much better way of saying what I was trying to tell him.

Once upon a time I had 5 years perfect attendance.....but I was young. But seriously, I have no problem getting a doctor's note. In fact my wife loves it, it makes me see the doctor vs John Wayne-ing it through and getting her sick too.
d
The problem was the TA went way beyond simply getting a doctors note.
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 07:07 AM
  #112  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
The problem was the TA went way beyond simply getting a doctors note.
Absolutely my point........read back a few pages on my concerns about who the worker bees were going to be. No one knew, they would only tell me it wasn't going to be Segwick.

I really don't think they had all the details worked out.

Ferd
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 07:13 AM
  #113  
forgot to bid's Avatar
Thread Starter
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
I never claimed sick leave changes were not a concession, though for me, having to complete a doctor note once in a while is not a huge burden. So were the OE changes. PS, not so much. Every agreement, including the one you may someday vote for, will have concessions. They occur on both sides of the ledger. Management conceded at least $1.1B net in this last one.
Do you consider DAL providing non union employees a raise to be a concession, or just giving a raise? I don't see raises as concessions. It's the cost of doing business. Like buying airplanes, it's the cost of doing business, don't ask the pilots to provide scope concessions to pay for their own equipment anymore than mechanics should have to make concessions to buy parts for planes.

But more importantly, let me guess why you're in favor of the sick language, OE language and PS changes:
A) You fly sick and think people should man up and fly even if they're not 100%.

B) You're not an FO so you're kind of jealous of the $300K 73N FO in NYC and so forth and don't think it's fair. All that stuff about pulling trips doesn't bother you because you're not an FO.

C) You bought into the at risk pay argument floated by the union months ago because you question nothing that comes from ALPA.
Is that about right?

And you need to read the contract before you vote on it. Just saying. Don't just take DALPA's word for what's in it. Think about the RAH debacle, that was a life lesson in how DALPA and it's lawyers work a contract.
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 07:20 AM
  #114  
forgot to bid's Avatar
Thread Starter
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I don't concede. Verify then trust. Show me the documented abuse. If this is truly the case deal with it on an individual basis. If it was a significant problem it would have and still can be addressed by LOA outside of sect. 6. This is an invented problem to drive productivity and reduce expectations.
We need to see real data at some point on this, you're spot on about that. Also, we need FedEx, UPS, SWA, UCAL and American sick data so we can compare abuse.

We just have a lot of people who just accepting things without question. I mean some people I guess just refuse to question anything DALPA says, they question nothing. DALPA is all things right and good and anyone who stands against that is obviously either a petulant Northwest pilot, a post 2001 new hire or a turncoat pre merger DAL who have been here a while.
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 07:36 AM
  #115  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Shoot the guilty and leave me alone IE no change to the current sick leave method.

Ferd
I agree with this except why not give some kind of credit for sick leave not used? They tried this in a small way with the TA but it should be improved. I think Timbo said it a long time ago. We get these hours every year and the vast majority of us use very few while we're young and healthy. They vaporize every year. Why not have a meaningful program that will fund you when something big happens or go toward your retirement if you never need it.

There are plenty of situations that could leave you trying to live on a fraction of your monthly pay when disability runs out. The unused hours could add up big time for many. FedEx and others have a form of it. An added benefit may be that it cuts down on those who view their sick leave as paid time off.
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 10:17 AM
  #116  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
I agree with this except why not give some kind of credit for sick leave not used? They tried this in a small way with the TA but it should be improved. I think Timbo said it a long time ago. We get these hours every year and the vast majority of us use very few while we're young and healthy. They vaporize every year. Why not have a meaningful program that will fund you when something big happens or go toward your retirement if you never need it.

There are plenty of situations that could leave you trying to live on a fraction of your monthly pay when disability runs out. The unused hours could add up big time for many. FedEx and others have a form of it. An added benefit may be that it cuts down on those who view their sick leave as paid time off.
Yup.....says the exNWA guy with over 800 hours in da sick bank at the merger
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 11:35 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by snowdawg
So you agreed to a policy in which you have no understanding how the company is going to follow through on? Yikes!!!

Why hide the answer on what the company will do?
It is management that believed the changes would curb abuse. I understood the policy when I cast my ballot, but it was never my intent to judge whether or not the changes would do what management wanted them to do. That's my only point here.
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 11:40 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I don't concede. Verify then trust. Show me the documented abuse. If this is truly the case deal with it on an individual basis. If it was a significant problem it would have and still can be addressed by LOA outside of sect. 6. This is an invented problem to drive productivity and reduce expectations.
The quote I heard at the road show was that the "alleged" patter of abuse was so evident, that were the company trying to accuse us of a job action, the charts would have been Exhibit 1. And it was up something like 35% since 2012 with no corresponding reason (age differences, 117 etc would not account for this big of a change). Just reporting the arguments that were made, and they were compelling.
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 12:00 PM
  #119  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Well shoot, if you heard it at the road show, you know it's true.

Was that before or after Donatelli ranted about the next step being PEB?
Reply
Old 09-11-2015 | 12:45 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
It is management that believed the changes would curb abuse. I understood the policy when I cast my ballot, but it was never my intent to judge whether or not the changes would do what management wanted them to do. That's my only point here.
Rocky,
Please, why doesn't C2012 curb alleged abuse? Somewhere in the back of your head, isn't there a little voice saying, "Rocky, they want to increase productivity".
If the change of policy is so small, how is it going to curb abuse?

Hey now
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Military
10
01-26-2011 06:31 PM
taymor1234
Hiring News
0
12-18-2010 06:30 PM
Joachim
Hangar Talk
12
01-02-2010 11:41 AM
CoastalFlyer
Hiring News
5
04-02-2009 02:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices