Search
Notices

New TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2015, 06:53 AM
  #11  
alto
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: M88
Posts: 50
Default

Possibly, but let's keep it on topic. I am curious how many posts will occur before even one person puts up some "YES" vote numbers and sick leave demands. I have been seeking this answer for 6 months without a single answer.

I MUST assume that if someone voted NO that they had in mind what would cause them to vote YES. What is the answer to that?
pileit is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 06:55 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,323
Default

Originally Posted by pileit View Post
BUT since July 1st I have lost $8k plus retirement of 15% on that (which is fine if a MUCH better deal is on the way).
How much were the concessions worth that you were willing to give away for that meager raise? You guys who keep touting the money lost always fail to figure in the concessions. Hence you were in the minority. The rest of us seem to be better at math.
capncrunch is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 06:56 AM
  #13  
alto
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: M88
Posts: 50
Default

There absolutely IS an answer. What package including QOL, sick, retirement and pay increases would garner a YES vote from you? You should be able to type those answers in 2 minutes.




Originally Posted by iFlyer View Post
There is no number - it's the whole package, which includes QOL issues and productivity concessions.


The big picture was our Union went into an expedited negotiation, lulled into a false sense of security, and expected a gentlemanly agreement where each side asks for +10% over what they expect to settle at, then meet in the middle.


The problem was the Company asked +80% over, and if we stay in the process, now we end up meeting at -35% under. We let ourselves get bamboozled.
pileit is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 06:57 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Gold-Braided Lesser French Fort Commander
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by pileit View Post
Again, restoration is MY goal too. But we didn't have profit sharing back in C2K as well as a number of other items. What will it take today including profit sharing to be considered "restoration"?

I am not suggesting rushing it at all...I also want to get it right. BUT since July 1st I have lost $8k plus retirement of 15% on that (which is fine if a MUCH better deal is on the way).

The question continues to be (referring to your last sentence) How much time? And what % constitutes "doing it right"? Those are very nebulous goals. I don't know how you meet those goals without numbers attached to them...thanks.

Again, you haven't "lost" anything. If so, you conveniently ignore what you were about to lose.

Therein lies the problem with counting your chickens before they hatch; especially when they're sitting in a nest with a bunch of alligator eggs. When those hatch, not only will they eat all of your chickens, they'll come after you!
iFlyer is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 06:59 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyallnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
You might find that the thousands of employees at Delta who saw their jobs eliminated and were given the choice of no job or work for DGS or DSS or the name of the month for outsourcing would disagree with you on being made whole.
You might also take a look at the retirement program they now have verses what they had before chapter 11.
Sailing, even for you, that statement is beyond the pale. Were you furloughed as a pilot from Delta? Were those pilots offered jobs at our subsidiaries? You more than anyone should be aware that the pilots sacrificed more than any other group. The amount of managers and VP's has increased tenfold here at Delta, the advancement opportunities for those folks has outpaced the stagnation that we've seen in our department. And finally, how many of the other employees make DL a career compared to the pilot group? You can say what you want, but the pilots have been left out in the cold with respect to what we had and what we gave up. Not even close.
flyallnite is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 07:08 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite View Post
Sailing, even for you, that statement is beyond the pale. Were you furloughed as a pilot from Delta? Were those pilots offered jobs at our subsidiaries? You more than anyone should be aware that the pilots sacrificed more than any other group. The amount of managers and VP's has increased tenfold here at Delta, the advancement opportunities for those folks has outpaced the stagnation that we've seen in our department. And finally, how many of the other employees make DL a career compared to the pilot group? You can say what you want, but the pilots have been left out in the cold with respect to what we had and what we gave up. Not even close.
All our furloughed pilots are back. Those ground employee jobs are gone forever. A slight difference.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 07:09 AM
  #17  
alto
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: M88
Posts: 50
Default

LOL, I hear ya...but we DID lose that because it was on the table waiting for a box to be checked. If it was a fictitious then I agree with you. All these side conversations are likely NEVER going to elicit a response to my original question. I am sure we will be off down a tangent LONG before anyone addresses the original question.


Originally Posted by iFlyer View Post
Again, you haven't "lost" anything. If so, you conveniently ignore what you were about to lose.

Therein lies the problem with counting your chickens before they hatch; especially when they're sitting in a nest with a bunch of alligator eggs. When those hatch, not only will they eat all of your chickens, they'll come after you!
pileit is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 07:13 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Default

Originally Posted by pileit View Post
Again, restoration is MY goal too. But we didn't have profit sharing back in C2K (correct, you had a pension) as well as a number of other items. What will it take today including profit sharing to be considered "restoration"?

Pay rates and work rules equivalent to C2K would be considered restoration. Each pilot has their own QOL vs. $$$ sliding scale. I tend to lean further toward the QOL vs straight pay rate side.

I am not suggesting rushing it at all...I also want to get it right. BUT since July 1st I have lost $8k plus retirement of 15% on that (which is fine if a MUCH better deal is on the way).

You are welcome for the "loss". 65% of us saved you from a career full of work rule erosions. BTW, I made $7k since July 1st on one IOE trip drop, followed by a green slip as a junior lineholder. So between the two of us, we are about even on pay. I may even chose to upgrade because senior lineholders are staying in place for the LCA drops.

The question continues to be (referring to your last sentence) How much time? And what % constitutes "doing it right"? Those are very nebulous goals. I don't know how you meet those goals without numbers attached to them...thanks.
We all have our own numbers and as a group, the NC has that info via the pre TA survey. The 65% no vote on NA15 substantiated that data, as the contract was short of the survey results and it was voted down. Personally, I have enough patience to wait 2-3 years for what I consider a fair contract. During that time, I will be saving every profit sharing check and building my personal strike fund.


In a nutshell, here is your answer

RESTORATION of pay rates to pre bankruptcy rates.
Leave all concessions out of our work rules.
RESTORATION of the value of vacation.
Adjust per diem to GSA published rates
RESTORATION of pay for training events.
The company pays for training inefficiency associated with a diverse fleet.


Back to the operating room, I have a rocket waiting...
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 07:14 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite View Post
Sailing, even for you, that statement is beyond the pale. Were you furloughed as a pilot from Delta? Were those pilots offered jobs at our subsidiaries? You more than anyone should be aware that the pilots sacrificed more than any other group. The amount of managers and VP's has increased tenfold here at Delta, the advancement opportunities for those folks has outpaced the stagnation that we've seen in our department. And finally, how many of the other employees make DL a career compared to the pilot group? You can say what you want, but the pilots have been left out in the cold with respect to what we had and what we gave up. Not even close.
All our furloughed pilots are back. Those ground employee jobs are gone forever. A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE
If however we as pilots feel that the ground employees and F/A's should be our benchmark then let's go to management and demand the same relative standard of pay and productivity relative to the competition the ground employees are getting. We will have a contract done in days and a incredibly happy management team.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-23-2015, 07:22 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Dismayed
Posts: 1,594
Default

Originally Posted by pileit View Post
There absolutely IS an answer. What package including QOL, sick, retirement and pay increases would garner a YES vote from you? You should be able to type those answers in 2 minutes.


10% DOS, 5% in each of the out years - minimum, I would prefer if they matched FedEx and took a hard look at SWA 737 rates and extrapolate for our long haul ops.

Profit Sharing - keep your hands off it. If it must be monetized, it comes AFTER any raise not in lieu of one. No more "cost neutral" contracts.

Sick leave - leave it alone, add in the gains from TA15 (FAA leave and disability gains)

Retirement - 1% more for each year of the contract

QOL - training, vacation and Min day should all be 6 hours. If I do anything for the company, I get 6.

There are other things and here is where I'll diverge from others, I can be paid like the execs - stock, options etc to keep if from the other employee groups and WS.

Now the tough part, how to get it. We've done the first item, let them know their offer wasn't good enough but they have to realize what we do for the operation to keep them reliable and on time - on the base visit video Network says they view that as a product. Further we'll need to start being aggressive - start informational ads and perhaps picketing. We also can't allow the company to keep spinning things like the FedEx TA without a response. Where was our outraged answer to Mr Anderson's threat of 3 July?

Last edited by dragon; 10-23-2015 at 07:25 AM. Reason: Profit Sharing
dragon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices