![]() |
Originally Posted by Tanker1497
(Post 2192387)
It did not get support by polling and wasn't directed for MEC to negotiate. If the company asked for it, I never read about it. Dalpa MEC site, contract faq's, section 3.
|
You'd think with the future increase in training events, the company will bring it up next time around.
|
Originally Posted by NERD
(Post 2191934)
Wait. How can this be? I thought we were being parked, iced, slapped! Arbitration, followed by a PEB!!!!!!!!!
Oh wait..... |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2192408)
The Southwest pilots will never get a deal after they called for their CEO to step down.
Oh wait..... |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2192411)
They did not get anywhere near the deal you assured us they would get.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2192415)
Again if we accepted their agreement in whole we would need over 8000 more pilots and average 4 days more off per month domestic and have a higher w-2.
You are so full of it. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2191996)
The negotiating committee was given some latitude to meet the company part way. The NMB appears to feel it might lead to a agreement.
|
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 2192453)
Given latitude by who? 65% of us give no latitude with respect to a concessionary contract. We expect gains in scope, vacation, sick leave and training, not trades for pay rates. When those negotiating on both sides finally figure out it is about 28 sections of the contract, not just a few tables in section 3, we will get somewhere. Until then it's just moving the deck chairs around.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2192415)
Again if we accepted their agreement in whole we would need over 8000 more pilots and average 4 days more off per month domestic and have a higher w-2.
|
Well..... using the math some have..... if you add the 401/dc money its close:D
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands