Search

Notices

Scope notepad out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2016 | 08:44 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker
Stop giving them viable jets, the ratios won't matter. You view not giving away more 76 seat rj's as a mistake???
Well, if they keep the 50-seaters around, the net size of DCI doesn't shrink, and we increase above our ratios without downside protection, it will prove to be a mistake, sure.

The whole premise for not trading a large number of 50-seaters for a much smaller number if 76-seaters (subject to seat remival in case if furlough) was that the 50-seaters were going away anyway, and the company wants to order 76-seaters badly enough to have us flying them. Let's see if one or both things happen before we log this as a win.
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 08:46 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,868
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
The reason the company wants lower limits on JV production balance is because that is where they intend to go...lower, not higher. Think about that. And when it comes to JVs in our contract, past performance is a very good indicator of future returns. Managment WILL go below whatever floor is established without penalty and we're proposing that we let them do it by writing the language into the contract. Bad precedent for future contracts everywhere.
Why are they adding flights to Europe next year? They do want flexibility in case of things like a economic collapse in Europe, a war in the Ukraine, revolution in Egypt etc...
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 08:51 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 166
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Well, if they keep the 50-seaters around, the net size of DCI doesn't shrink, and we increase above our ratios without downside protection, it will prove to be a mistake, sure.

The whole premise for not trading a large number of 50-seaters for a much smaller number if 76-seaters (subject to seat remival in case if furlough) was that the 50-seaters were going away anyway, and the company wants to order 76-seaters badly enough to have us flying. Let's see if one or both things happen before we log this as a win.
Keep in mind they don't have to park ALL the 50's to make this a win for us. They can keep up to 76 50 seaters long term and it's a wash in seats. Anything less and its a win. Not only that, but even if they do that, 50's are more expensive seats, require more pilots (that they're going to be pressed to keep finding) and are far worse operationally (constantly weight and balance restricted and an inferior product) so the effective break even number is likely north of 76. I think keeping RJ scope where it is currently is a better move.
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 09:00 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Why are they adding flights to Europe next year? They do want flexibility in case of things like a economic collapse in Europe, a war in the Ukraine, revolution in Egypt etc...
Because we still live under C2012. If we pass this AIP into a TA, I wouldn't be surprised if some of the new Europe flying disappears.

Those events you mention affect all JV partners. So why are we always the ones to volunteer to take it in the shorts?
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 09:18 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Why are they adding flights to Europe next year? They do want flexibility in case of things like a economic collapse in Europe, a war in the Ukraine, revolution in Egypt etc...
Black swans...black swans everywhere. Way to plant the fear seed. Classic Moak tactic.
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 09:23 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gopher3
Black swans...black swans everywhere. Way to plant the fear seed. Classic Moak tactic.
Not as classic as ad hominem attacks.

Got something to refute his point about flights being added?

He wasn't saying those things are coming true, but now that you mention it... I just watched the presidential debate. The swans are blacker than normal, these days. I'll take downside insurance. That is to say I'll evaluate it carefully. I'm still not sure how the floor works, considering it's global, but seems to be triggered by the TAJV.

Last edited by Sink r8; 10-11-2016 at 09:34 AM.
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 09:35 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Not as classic as ad hominem attacks.

Got something to refute his point about flights being added?

He wasn't saying those things are coming true, but now that you mention it... I just watched the presidential debate. The swans are blacker than normal, these days. I'll take downside insurance.
All of those events have already happened, so you're right, he wasn't saying those things are coming true. So I guess our JV partners must be immune to those kind of things happening in their back yard because they continue to fly more than 50% of the JV flying. Must be some awesome management at those airlines.
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 10:01 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 166
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
All of those events have already happened, so you're right, he wasn't saying those things are coming true. So I guess our JV partners must be immune to those kind of things happening in their back yard because they continue to fly more than 50% of the JV flying. Must be some awesome management at those airlines.
Not only that, but when we pull down longer direct flights and instead just shuttle pax to their hubs in shorter block hour flights, we only share the shorter block hours. That's like double dipping in reverse.
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 10:07 AM
  #109  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: 777A
Default

Has anyone answered whether we are above or below 650000 hrs now and by how much?
Reply
Old 10-11-2016 | 10:09 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
All of those events have already happened, so you're right, he wasn't saying those things are coming true. So I guess our JV partners must be immune to those kind of things happening in their back yard because they continue to fly more than 50% of the JV flying. Must be some awesome management at those airlines.
Doesn't seem like they're immune to me. I own a little AF/KLM stock, and they haven't done very well. I don't know whether we pulled back, or simply failed to grow into our targets, but everything I read about the Atlantic market says it's soft, so I think it was problematic to add much capacity.

Wat in Ukraine, economic collapse in Europe, revolution in Egypt... are all plays in which we might have seen but the first act. I wouldn't presume to predict the future on any of these points.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 10:35 AM
yamahas3
Major
27
02-12-2011 06:41 AM
Beagle Pilot
Major
76
05-06-2010 07:18 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
1
09-28-2005 05:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices