Notices

TAJV

Old 10-18-2016 | 11:20 AM
  #131  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,219
Likes: 664
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
Are you mixing units and saying 1%=1 flight?
I was using the previous poster's 1 Flight ~ 1% in order to show that even by his/her assumption the lose of 5 flights world wide, 1 of them being trans-Atlantic still puts Delta in compliance.

The bottom line is we can go from roughly 687,000 block hours to 650,000.

This is a loss of 37,000 block hours, regardless of which theatre they come from. The only metric is AF/KLM compliance they could go down to 1 trans-Atlantic international flight as long as it is matched by 1 AF/KLM flight and there is no global block hour floor.

A much better way to do this is to require a minimum of 95% of the previous years block hours and a ratio of all Delta international flying to all of the code share flying.

Delta pilots will fly 50% of all global international EASKs, if not in compliance then no less than 95% of the previous years global block hours. In any year where EASKs flown by codeshare partners exceeds those flown by Delta the number of excess EASKs will be multiplied by X dollars and distributed to the pilots.
Reply
Old 10-18-2016 | 11:42 AM
  #132  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
Yep, thanks for asking.

One problem I have with your accounting. You say these are numbers through Oct. If you're talking calendar year, you're fudging numbers in dividing flight frequency by 366. The loss is actually 2 daily round trips per day if we're talking calendar year for all your figures above. And that's 2 round trips per day below our already out of compliance 47.7%. Use the actual 50% target, not the 48.5% floor (now ceiling) in current contract, and we get a more accurate picture of what we're giving away in metrics.
It is looking back twelve months which would include the extra leap day, hence 366.
Reply
Old 10-18-2016 | 11:45 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DALMECVolunteer
It is looking back twelve months which would include the extra leap day, hence 366.
Ok, fair enough. Thanks for tracking down those figures.
Reply
Old 10-18-2016 | 12:33 PM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
A much better way to do this is to require a minimum of 95% of the previous years block hours and a ratio of all Delta international flying to all of the code share flying.

Delta pilots will fly 50% of all global international EASKs, if not in compliance then no less than 95% of the previous years global block hours. In any year where EASKs flown by codeshare partners exceeds those flown by Delta the number of excess EASKs will be multiplied by X dollars and distributed to the pilots.
I like the measured and rational approach, but two small comments:

1). 95% of the year before, over a multi-year downturn, seems like a poor choice.

2). 50% could be selling yourself short in future JV's. I think we're well above that with VA (and rightly so). Based on our size, and depending on the market, we might be entitled to more.

Just food for thought.
Reply
Old 10-18-2016 | 01:11 PM
  #135  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,219
Likes: 664
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I like the measured and rational approach, but two small comments:

1). 95% of the year before, over a multi-year downturn, seems like a poor choice.

2). 50% could be selling yourself short in future JV's. I think we're well above that with VA (and rightly so). Based on our size, and depending on the market, we might be entitled to more.

Just food for thought.
The 95% came from the DALPA explanation of 650,000 block hours used to target a 95% protection. 95% sets a movable floor that adjusts as the amount of global flying increases.

The 50% global requires we do half the total flying not controlling each JV or theater individually, which allows the flexibility Delta seeks.

My $0.02. I welcome the criticism.
Reply
Old 10-18-2016 | 01:58 PM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Not criticism. Trying to think through what you wrote.
Reply
Old 10-18-2016 | 04:10 PM
  #137  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,219
Likes: 664
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Not criticism. Trying to think through what you wrote.
criticism - the act of making careful judgments about good and bad qualities (usually when evaluating art)

examination would have been a better choice of word.

No negative connotation intended. I gotta use more emojis.

I think this could work. If there's a flaw in the logic, I'll move on. Doesn't matter in relation to the vote but we have to find a better score card for scope or we lose the KISS principle and the interpretations are twisted.
Reply
Old 10-18-2016 | 04:23 PM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Understood.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
orvil
Delta
25
06-19-2015 05:18 AM
80ktsClamp
Delta
30
06-17-2015 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices