Airline Pilot Central Forums - Tattletale Tuesday

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)

- Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)

- - Tattletale Tuesday (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/99606-tattletale-tuesday.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 2289947)

There is no evidence of specific numbers. The evidence we have is the statement of overwhelming support in feedback received by the Captain reps. Notice how the FO reps don't mention feedback in their decision but more their thought process after "interviewing" JM and BB. Yet in the C44 update prior to the election all CK and JJ stated were give me your input while both SD and SM gave detailed analysis about who they planned to vote for. It's clear that the majority of 44 preferred JM and the FO reps ignored it for their own agenda

15% of ATL pilots voted against the TA. I would assume almost all of those pilots would be against Malone. But, that's just a guess.

Of the 85% that voted for the TA, how is it that you are so sure that the vast majority of them were for Malone. I heard a lot of lukewarm support for the TA, especially from mid level FO's -- even ATL FOs.

I've been pretty bad at judging sentiment lately. I'm just wondering how you can be so sure?

I guess we'll find out. :D

its likely the tie between reps and their constituency would be far more legitimate, and far better served with a seniority block model.

The MEC chairman is elected by reps. You don't get a vote on the MEC chairman. That's by design. You guys are too funny. Wuzthatforus isn't correct.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 2289818)

You might need something to get over your chronic grumpiness:D. Just worry about your Council and you'll be alright.

If you are right when you say "So goes 44, so goes the MEC," wouldn't tunes have every reason to not just worry about his council?

Quote:

Originally Posted by fly2002 (Post 2290069)

The MEC chairman is elected by reps. You don't get a vote on the MEC chairman. That's by design. You guys are too funny. Wuzthatforus isn't correct.

What am I incorrect about?

Quote:

Originally Posted by tunes (Post 2289877)

don't worry, I'm doing my part to ensure Worrall doesn't get back in. :D

Has anybody stepped up to oppose RW yet? I haven't seen anything in writing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 2289797)

The plan is to nominate 2 moderate and reasonable FO reps that will vote according to the will of 44 like the CA reps do(So goes 44, so goes the MEC). The Council needs to be well represented now that the new regime is in power. Especially if they are attempting to make big changes to MEC policy as outlined in Captain Worrall's communique.

2 Moakie drones who have run before. O'Mahoney and Nestor. God help us.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sobchak (Post 2290793)

Has anybody stepped up to oppose RW yet? I haven't seen anything in writing.

i never even got the RW email, but yes multiple people....should all come out at the LEC meeting

Quote:

Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2290833)

2 Moakie drones who have run before. O'Mahoney and Nestor. God help us.

O yayyyyyyyy

Quote:

Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2290833)

2 Moakie drones who have run before. O'Mahoney and Nestor. God help us.

O'Mahoney is a Captain. You pull stuff out of your rump with the best of 'em.