![]() |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2289706)
Nope. When reps shout down and full on insult the members they are supposed to represent in an attempt to sell an unprecedented failure of a TA, that is the time for a recall.
This recall is a farce and nothing but a power grab... the recalls post the failed TA were appropriate. You don't mess up to that level without being brought to task. I won't be voting for JJ if he runs again due to his bumblings, but a recall is completely inappropriate here. I do agree that if a rep acted like this they should be recalled. But a wave of recalls because they all acted as you said? You thought recalls were appropriate because you didn't like TA1. If one didn't like the TA the appropriate response was a No vote. Not numerous recalls. 38% voted No to C2012 and there were no recalls for that. But the recall Pandora's box was opened with the Kingsley R. recall. The sweeping TA1 recalls served to make recalls normal every time someone doesn't like something. Also a mistake IMO. And here we are. |
Regarding the appropriateness of recalls for TA1 v now.
The reps in TA1 cost us real, no kidding money. This time, not only did they not cost us money, they're the ones who helped put it in our pockets (along with JM). If loyalty to one man is enough to justify these recalls, a special election that will open the door for the recall of the new MEC Chair, the new Vice Chair, the new Secretary and the new Treasurer followed immediately by a contentious election for new MEC officers with a completely dysfunctional MEC, and another round of elections in C44 to replace the interim reps (or confirm them), then So Be It. Pay attention folks. This is exactly the plan. Unlike the recalls for TA1, no good will one of this recall effort for the bulk of 13,000 pilots - only a few who are going through FPL withdrawals will benefit. Oh, the MEC wants you to wear your ALPA pin. You know, unity and all. |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 2289728)
Trip,
What percentage of ATL pilots do you believe supported Malone for MEC Chairman? What Johnson and Kern did to 44 with their MEC executive votes is akin to walking right into the heart of Ohio State's campus and planting a Michigan flag. Kern nominated someone moderate for a MEC position then voted for a strong 12er. Is is normal to not vote for someone you nominated? |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2289778)
Overwhelming majority. 70%+
What Johnson and Kern did to 44 with their MEC executive votes is akin to walking right into the heart of Ohio State's campus and planting a Michigan flag. Kern nominated someone moderate for a MEC position then voted for a strong 12er. Is is normal to not vote for someone you nominated? Go ahead. Tell us the real plan. Recall these two. Elect interim proactive appeasers at a poorly attended C44 meeting, then recall the new MEC Chair and the other three. Then hold an election to put in who, exactly, as the new Chair?? And he'll have a margin of one as his mandate. The MEC will devolve even further. And this benefits the Delta pilots how? Please, someone explain how this recall benefits the Atlanta and Delta pilots. Please. |
Originally Posted by Wuzatforus
(Post 2289784)
Ok. What next? What's the plan? You dump these guys to what end? Just punishment? The "damage" is done. Recalling these two does not negate the election.
Go ahead. Tell us the real plan. Recall these two. Elect interim proactive appeasers at a poorly attended C44 meeting, then recall the new MEC Chair and the other three. Then hold an election to put in who, exactly, as the new Chair?? And he'll have a margin of one as his mandate. The MEC will devolve even further. And this benefits the Delta pilots how? Please, someone explain how this recall benefits the Atlanta and Delta pilots. Please. |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2289797)
The plan is to nominate 2 moderate and reasonable FO reps that will vote according to the will of 44 like the CA reps do(So goes 44, so goes the MEC). The Council needs to be well represented now that the new regime is in power. Especially if they are attempting to make big changes to MEC policy as outlined in Captain Worrall's communique.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2289797)
The plan is to nominate 2 moderate and reasonable FO reps that will vote according to the will of 44 like the CA reps do(So goes 44, so goes the MEC). The Council needs to be well represented now that the new regime is in power. Especially if they are attempting to make big changes to MEC policy as outlined in Captain Worrall's communique.
Please do share with us Captain Worrall's communique. I know not of what you speak. I can guess though. Holy cow. We are turning the clock back 10 years. |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 2289805)
I've said it before, and I'll say it again....I want some of whatever you are smoking to get to this fantasy world you are in.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2289797)
The plan is to nominate 2 moderate and reasonable FO reps that will vote according to the will of 44 like the CA reps do(So goes 44, so goes the MEC). The Council needs to be well represented now that the new regime is in power. Especially if they are attempting to make big changes to MEC policy as outlined in Captain Worrall's communique.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2289543)
Exactly. Personally, I likely won't be voting for Johnson if he runs for reelection, but this is a farce recall attempt. I hope it fails by a landslide.
.. I voted against recall, even though I'm sure I would not vote for them if they ran again in the next election. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands