New EDGI success rate is 87%
03-07-2020, 06:24 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,793
Originally Posted by DL31082
True. I know of at least 2 rejected by the PARB, between the Jan and Feb interview months. I’ve heard of at least 3 more but don’t know them personally.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
03-07-2020, 07:34 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,417
Originally Posted by DL31082
True. I know of at least 2 rejected by the PARB, between the Jan and Feb interview months. I’ve heard of at least 3 more but don’t know them personally.
03-07-2020, 10:17 AM
#23
On Guard!
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by Baradium
Ok, if you insist. Considering the OTS success rates are ALSO day one, and that is how Delta has always done it, and you don't even have any evidence to the contrary NOR have you come up with anyone who has failed day two you are coming across as someone who isn't happy unless everything is horrible.
This isn't being "more realistic" this is simply not accepting positive outcomes.
This isn't being "more realistic" this is simply not accepting positive outcomes.
You were saying something about realistic and accepting outcomes?
Last edited by Meow1215; 03-07-2020 at 10:44 AM.
03-07-2020, 11:47 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,767
Originally Posted by Meow1215
So per this thread it’s 70% and 75% not 85+ and definitely not 99+ day 2.
You were saying something about realistic and accepting outcomes?
You were saying something about realistic and accepting outcomes?
I will say, to Delta credit, they wanted you all to get one extra point, which NJ made them tell us how many would have been helped. When the number was zero, Delta got real and upped the points so that it mattered.
If the day two is cutting that many guys I believe that is a higher number, and Deltas doing their crap again.
With that said I'm here, I thought the interview was fair, but if it was fair why were guys in my group that didn't get it have the same experience I had and thought they did ok? *Shrug*.
Glad to be at Delta but I'm not happy until I see a LOT more guys over here from EDV.
03-07-2020, 02:16 PM
#25
On Guard!
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by theUpsideDown
At this point guys should identify if they believed the DGI was going to be a roaring success or not.
I will say, to Delta credit, they wanted you all to get one extra point, which NJ made them tell us how many would have been helped. When the number was zero, Delta got real and upped the points so that it mattered.
If the day two is cutting that many guys I believe that is a higher number, and Deltas doing their crap again.
With that said I'm here, I thought the interview was fair, but if it was fair why were guys in my group that didn't get it have the same experience I had and thought they did ok? *Shrug*.
Glad to be at Delta but I'm not happy until I see a LOT more guys over here from EDV.
I will say, to Delta credit, they wanted you all to get one extra point, which NJ made them tell us how many would have been helped. When the number was zero, Delta got real and upped the points so that it mattered.
If the day two is cutting that many guys I believe that is a higher number, and Deltas doing their crap again.
With that said I'm here, I thought the interview was fair, but if it was fair why were guys in my group that didn't get it have the same experience I had and thought they did ok? *Shrug*.
Glad to be at Delta but I'm not happy until I see a LOT more guys over here from EDV.
03-07-2020, 03:13 PM
#26
:-)
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Originally Posted by Meow1215
I’m glad that you made it, I’m glad that the guys who got retroactive CJOs made it, I’m glad to see at least an improvement. Where my criticism comes in at is 9E/DL making this out to be better than it is and the lack of transparency. I get it, DPS has their goofball secret sauce to their “proprietary” process. But when people who are already flying your brand, flying your customers, on Delta owned planes - you should tell them the problem. Transparently tell them the problem. This elitist crap and condescending stance is just that: crap. Hiding behind the excuse “that’s the process” doesn’t seem to excuse the fact that Propel still has a better path to Delta. You don’t want to transparently explain the process? Make an Endeavor edition of the interview that floats the boat, works for Propel. Hate us 400 on the top of list? Fine! Don’t hang the rest of the pilot group for it.
03-07-2020, 04:50 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,240
Originally Posted by Mesabah
I happen to think the EDGI is an easier process than Propel at this point. Obviously, you could get to Delta faster with Propel, but that fluctuates from time to time.
03-07-2020, 07:07 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Originally Posted by Flogger
I just don't understand the logic?
You are not fit to fly Delta Passengers.
Now, please go back to your little regional jet and fly Delta passengers.
?
What am I missing here?
You are not fit to fly Delta Passengers.
Now, please go back to your little regional jet and fly Delta passengers.
?
What am I missing here?
The hat and double breasted attitude?
03-07-2020, 07:08 PM
#30
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: My olds Intrigue- Left seat
Posts: 89
Originally Posted by Flogger
I just don't understand the logic?
You are not fit to fly Delta Passengers.
Now, please go back to your little regional jet and fly Delta passengers.
?
What am I missing here?
You are not fit to fly Delta Passengers.
Now, please go back to your little regional jet and fly Delta passengers.
?
What am I missing here?
Smfh
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
