[QUOTE=Mesabah;3026451]I already talked about it in a previous post, it would be in our best interest to make sure those furloughed Delta pilots end up here.[/QUOTE
Easy for you to say looking at it from where your sitting on the seniority list. I’m 40% and I’d rather see the the MEC tell them to pound sand rather then take up a flow back. Unless it meant zero furloughs at 9E and bringing more airframes to 9E to ensure that doesn’t happen. |
[QUOTE=DeltaCorrectons;3026460]
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 3026451)
I already talked about it in a previous post, it would be in our best interest to make sure those furloughed Delta pilots end up here.[/QUOTE
Easy for you to say looking at it from where your sitting on the seniority list. I’m 40% and I’d rather see the the MEC tell them to pound sand rather then take up a flow back. Unless it meant zero furloughs at 9E and bringing more airframes to 9E to ensure that doesn’t happen. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 3026451)
I already talked about it in a previous post, it would be in our best interest to make sure those furloughed Delta pilots end up here.
|
Originally Posted by CabbiInbound
(Post 3026466)
I’m going to guess the bottom 1500 guys on our list who would end up on the street would disagree with you...
I’m in the bottom 6% and would be willing to give up my seat if it meant a DL seniority number that matches my DOH at EDV. I also recognize that the 5-20yr veteran would not want to be displaced or bumped down by any DL flowback. I really wasn’t a “hard chargin” Progression for all type, but if there was ever a time, this is it. Also remember in business negotiations it’s always about leverage. It’s not personal, it’s business. So if you feel the time is inappropriate, it’s really not. Because the other side of the table will always use their tools to the fullest extent possible. |
Originally Posted by CabbiInbound
(Post 3026466)
I’m going to guess the bottom 1500 guys on our list who would end up on the street would disagree with you...
|
Do any of the AA wholly owns have flow back? Compass and their flow/flow back made sense. Their pilots had the ability to go to NW. We do not DL pilots anything, since we never had a flow up. And putting 90% of our pilots on the street for a flow up in 2-3 years (which they could probably eliminate in CH11) makes zero sense. We do not owe DL anything, and need to look after our own first.
|
Originally Posted by Rayjay
(Post 3026525)
Do any of the AA wholly owns have flow back? Compass and their flow/flow back made sense. Their pilots had the ability to go to NW. We do not DL pilots anything, since we never had a flow up. And putting 90% of our pilots on the street for a flow up in 2-3 years (which they could probably eliminate in CH11) makes zero sense. We do not owe DL anything, and need to look after our own first.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 3026561)
It’s not 90%, it’s 350 pilots for 35 aircraft that we can’t operate anyway.
Since we already have over 90 parked why would we give anything right now. Wait for this to settle out and see the hopeful recovery insight and then agree to something when those airplanes would be projected to come back online. |
Originally Posted by DeltaCorrectons
(Post 3026574)
Since we already have over 90 parked why would we give anything right now. Wait for this to settle out and see the hopeful recovery insight and then agree to something when those airplanes would be projected to come back online.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 3026561)
It’s not 90%, it’s 350 pilots for 35 aircraft that we can’t operate anyway.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands