Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Search
Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2020, 06:26 AM
  #24171  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Position: 24d
Posts: 376
Default

500k isn't enough. It would be interesting to hear what was in this report.
Sperrysan is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 08:31 AM
  #24172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Default

Originally Posted by Sperrysan View Post
500k isn't enough. It would be interesting to hear what was in this report.
You can read it. It's publicly available.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 09:13 AM
  #24173  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Position: 24d
Posts: 376
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
You can read it. It's publicly available.
I can read! But too lazy to look it up. Anyone care to share the cliff notes version of it?
Sperrysan is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 10:01 AM
  #24174  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,503
Default

Originally Posted by Sperrysan View Post
I can read! But too lazy to look it up. Anyone care to share the cliff notes version of it?
Sure. Cliff notes version: Someone made themselves a pain in the butt carping about a putative safety issue. Whether that was a legitimate safety issue is the subject of another debate. What was alleged to the court was that the management retaliated against the person by directing a fitness for duty exam alleging the complaining individual was psychotic FOR THE PURPOSE OF GETTING RID OF HER with the shrink of managements choice and then not responding appropriately when two other shrinks had opinions refuting that of the initial company-paid shrink.

The court seems to have accepted the accuracy of that allegation and found for the plaintiff/carper.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 11:32 AM
  #24175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Position: ATL FO
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Sure. Cliff notes version: Someone made themselves a pain in the butt carping about a putative safety issue. Whether that was a legitimate safety issue is the subject of another debate. What was alleged to the court was that the management retaliated against the person by directing a fitness for duty exam alleging the complaining individual was psychotic FOR THE PURPOSE OF GETTING RID OF HER with the shrink of managements choice and then not responding appropriately when two other shrinks had opinions refuting that of the initial company-paid shrink.

The court seems to have accepted the accuracy of that allegation and found for the plaintiff/carper.
The cliff notes version for the 99% of pilots who will not read the report, depositions, and discovery is that if you come at the king you best not miss. And the mothership doesn't take kindly to having your grievances aired out in a very public manner. My worthless .02 is that both parties were in the wrong. Plaintiff has had past issues and i'll leave it at that. The biggest takeaway for everyone should be to think once or twice before taking to APC, FB, or your personal blog to bash the company.
JonGoodsell764 is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 12:08 PM
  #24176  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Position: 24d
Posts: 376
Default

Yeah I read the article about the suit. Looking for the cliff notes version of her report.
Sperrysan is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 02:46 PM
  #24177  
Lineholder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: Death by Powerpoint
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by Sperrysan View Post
Yeah I read the article about the suit. Looking for the cliff notes version of her report.
ask the CEO...
web500sjc is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 04:33 PM
  #24178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by Sperrysan View Post
Yeah I read the article about the suit. Looking for the cliff notes version of her report.
​​​​​​
I believe it had something to do with calculating duty time and the company's interpretation of FAR 117, but I could be wrong...
flyingfiddler is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 05:15 PM
  #24179  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Position: 24d
Posts: 376
Default

Originally Posted by flyingfiddler View Post
​​​​​​
I believe it had something to do with calculating duty time and the company's interpretation of FAR 117, but I could be wrong...
Maybe someone finally started calling out airlines for their policies with sick pilots. Mgmt shouts if you are sick call in, but don't get sick too many times or you will get in trouble.
Sperrysan is offline  
Old 12-30-2020, 05:43 PM
  #24180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Default

Originally Posted by flyingfiddler View Post
​​​​​​
I believe it had something to do with calculating duty time and the company's interpretation of FAR 117, but I could be wrong...
I think part of it was she thought positive space to work should be considered FDP. And she allegedly emailed the CEO demanding he pay for a layover Christmas party.
CBreezy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices