Poor Union Communication
05-07-2019 | 04:36 PM
#91
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Non equal across the board for CAs would be BS and union should never accept that. Your screwing half the pilot group who chose the 145 because the pay was the same as the 175. Those pilots don’t have a chance to change planes unless they were displaced. The more talk you hear, I hope they let the pilot group vote. Pilots not being able to vote, then asking the pilots to participate in the union is BS. Unless the deal is a home run, if there are any questions...vote. Like the reserve we shot down a year ago.
05-07-2019 | 04:59 PM
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Non equal across the board for CAs would be BS and union should never accept that. Your screwing half the pilot group who chose the 145 because the pay was the same as the 175. Those pilots don’t have a chance to change planes unless they were displaced. The more talk you hear, I hope they let the pilot group vote. Pilots not being able to vote, then asking the pilots to participate in the union is BS. Unless the deal is a home run, if there are any questions...vote. Like the reserve we shot down a year ago.
And we should be voting on the bag room cleaning dates too
05-07-2019 | 05:16 PM
#94
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Fetal
Non equal across the board for CAs would be BS and union should never accept that. Your screwing half the pilot group who chose the 145 because the pay was the same as the 175. Those pilots don’t have a chance to change planes unless they were displaced. The more talk you hear, I hope they let the pilot group vote. Pilots not being able to vote, then asking the pilots to participate in the union is BS. Unless the deal is a home run, if there are any questions...vote. Like the reserve we shot down a year ago.
05-07-2019 | 06:27 PM
#95
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 552
Likes: 1
05-07-2019 | 06:31 PM
#97
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 385
Likes: 1
Non equal across the board for CAs would be BS and union should never accept that. Your screwing half the pilot group who chose the 145 because the pay was the same as the 175. Those pilots don’t have a chance to change planes unless they were displaced. The more talk you hear, I hope they let the pilot group vote. Pilots not being able to vote, then asking the pilots to participate in the union is BS. Unless the deal is a home run, if there are any questions...vote. Like the reserve we shot down a year ago.
05-07-2019 | 07:44 PM
#99
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 2
05-08-2019 | 03:43 AM
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Non equal across the board for CAs would be BS and union should never accept that. Your screwing half the pilot group who chose the 145 because the pay was the same as the 175. Those pilots don’t have a chance to change planes unless they were displaced. The more talk you hear, I hope they let the pilot group vote. Pilots not being able to vote, then asking the pilots to participate in the union is BS. Unless the deal is a home run, if there are any questions...vote. Like the reserve we shot down a year ago.
Are you worried only the 175 will get the raises? I doubt that will happen or you would have a real $=*+ Show on your hands. But like someone said before it looks like it will be more complicated than a strayforward pay bump. If there are “winners and losers” then I’d vote no. However the winner and loser approach to our union continues to happen.
