![]() |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 2825268)
So they are saying they can’t improve pay and working conditions because they need those 19 fighting hard to get out to other airlines to keep their mystery math flow working.
|
Even if the flow takes 7-9 years, wouldn’t envoy still be the best choice for a single person under the age of 30 who can drive to ORD or DFW? I imagine that’s why even with lower pay envoy isn’t struggling to fill classes because the “long” flow still has value.
|
Originally Posted by Ihavenoidea
(Post 2825309)
Even if the flow takes 7-9 years, wouldn’t envoy still be the best choice for a single person under the age of 30 who can drive to ORD or DFW? I imagine that’s why even with lower pay envoy isn’t struggling to fill classes because the “long” flow still has value.
|
Originally Posted by imthecaptainnow
(Post 2825326)
In 9 years there won't be any point to the flow. Most of the hiring will be done by then.
Get real. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2825329)
Wow. So no-one should start this career in 5 years time? Because in 9 years when they might be competitive for a major, "the hiring will be done" and there's no point to go.
Get real. Sacrificing pay and QOL for a smoke and mirrors flow that MAY be there in six to nine years is not worth it. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2825334)
In nine years this industry likely will not look like it does now. A new hire today, heck, the new hires in the last three years, have no guarantee they will actually flow.
Sacrificing pay and QOL for a smoke and mirrors flow that MAY be there in six to nine years is not worth it. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2825338)
That could well be. But saying in 9 years flowing is not worth it is absolute horsesh*t.
|
Originally Posted by Voski
(Post 2825343)
Not sure if you're deranged, but nobody is saying that starting an airline career today is not worth it. What they are saying is that with flows projected at nearly a decade, the flow to AA is worthless at this point. The hiring is not bottomless; American won't forever be hiring at approximately 80 per month. The flow agreement formula for the majority of the unprotected pilots will turn that flow and turn it into an ebb.
In 9 years there won't be any point to the flow. Most of the hiring will be done by then. So he's saying there is no point to flow in 9 years, because you will be behind a big hiring wave. That's just bullcrap. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2825344)
No, that's exactly what he said.
In 9 years there won't be any point to the flow. Most of the hiring will be done by then. So he's saying there is no point to flow in 9 years, because you will be behind a big hiring wave. That's just bullcrap. You are perfectly parroting what everyone is saying, yet you arrive at an entirely different conclusion. Yes, the hiring wave will be over. Yes, flows will slow down. No, it's not good for a pilot's career to get stuck at the very bottom of a seniority list when hiring goes stagnant... assuming the flow even pans out after 9 years. That's forever in the aviation industry. Why then, dera, is it "just bullcrap?" In your opinion, why is the flow still valuable at 9 years for a newhire today? |
Originally Posted by UnprotectdPilot
(Post 2825346)
Where is the lie though? :rolleyes:
You are perfectly parroting what everyone is saying, yet you arrive at an entirely different conclusion. Yes, the hiring wave will be over. Yes, flows will slow down. No, it's not good for a pilot's career to get stuck at the very bottom of a seniority list when hiring goes stagnant... assuming the flow even pans out after 9 years. That's forever in the aviation industry. Why then, dera, is it "just bullcrap?" In your opinion, why is the flow still valuable at 9 years for a newhire today? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands