< 6 Year Flow
05-22-2019 | 02:49 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: CA
< 6 Year Flow
From the Envoy Pilot Recruitment's FB page today:
From the outdated February 2019 interactive seniority list:
8.89 years (and higher now)
I would LOVE to see how the company "projects" it's estimated flow times. It's the only reason people still keep coming here and it's built on a mountain of lies.
From the outdated February 2019 interactive seniority list:
8.89 years (and higher now)
I would LOVE to see how the company "projects" it's estimated flow times. It's the only reason people still keep coming here and it's built on a mountain of lies.
05-22-2019 | 03:03 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
From the Envoy Pilot Recruitment's FB page today:
From the outdated February 2019 interactive seniority list:
8.89 years (and higher now)
I would LOVE to see how the company "projects" it's estimated flow times. It's the only reason people still keep coming here and it's built on a mountain of lies.
From the outdated February 2019 interactive seniority list:
8.89 years (and higher now)
I would LOVE to see how the company "projects" it's estimated flow times. It's the only reason people still keep coming here and it's built on a mountain of lies.
05-22-2019 | 03:19 PM
#5
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 507
Likes: 1
If you are senior to me: 8.9 makes sense. Go to Spirit, et al.
If you're junior: Look, there is no way that 200-ish lifers are going to suddenly change their minds and flow. Obviously, we need to see the methodology behind both recruiting and ALPA numbers to be sure, but the truth is probably somewhere between both figures. Weight could likely be given to the recruiting number simply because their formula probably eliminates projected lifers (whether they've declined already or by age) from the get go.
Gotta play the long game, but also keep your options open.
If you're junior: Look, there is no way that 200-ish lifers are going to suddenly change their minds and flow. Obviously, we need to see the methodology behind both recruiting and ALPA numbers to be sure, but the truth is probably somewhere between both figures. Weight could likely be given to the recruiting number simply because their formula probably eliminates projected lifers (whether they've declined already or by age) from the get go.
Gotta play the long game, but also keep your options open.
05-22-2019 | 03:29 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
If you are senior to me: 8.9 makes sense. Go to Spirit, et al.
If you're junior: Look, there is no way that 200-ish lifers are going to suddenly change their minds and flow. Obviously, we need to see the methodology behind both recruiting and ALPA numbers to be sure, but the truth is probably somewhere between both figures. Weight could likely be given to the recruiting number simply because their formula probably eliminates projected lifers (whether they've declined already or by age) from the get go.
Gotta play the long game, but also keep your options open.
If you're junior: Look, there is no way that 200-ish lifers are going to suddenly change their minds and flow. Obviously, we need to see the methodology behind both recruiting and ALPA numbers to be sure, but the truth is probably somewhere between both figures. Weight could likely be given to the recruiting number simply because their formula probably eliminates projected lifers (whether they've declined already or by age) from the get go.
Gotta play the long game, but also keep your options open.
05-23-2019 | 04:56 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
I saw some comments calling them out but they seem to have mysteriously disappeared, almost as if they were deleted or hidden by their social media manager.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
