Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
Envoy AA4125 Slides off ORD Runway Video >

Envoy AA4125 Slides off ORD Runway Video

Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy AA4125 Slides off ORD Runway Video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2019, 05:13 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 546
Default

Originally Posted by FlyPurdue View Post
Discussing this publicly is not my intention. I tried to be vague so only Envoy pilots would know what I was alluding to. That page saved me a few times when I first upgraded, as I did not even know it existed until my first winter as Captain.

I understand your concern, and my own apparent contradiction. I will delete it if it gives too much info.
I don’t think your comment gives too much away, and it would only be understood by someone with access to FM-1. I’m just afraid it’ll open up a conversation that shouldn’t be had here. Not everyone has that same level of tact.
But seriously is offline  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:21 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
Don’t passengers know they’re not supposed to video. In portrait mode.
It's one of my biggest pet peeves.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2picMQC-9E
highfarfast is offline  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:23 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
I hope ORD will re-evaluate if that runway really was 5/5/5 as they said in the ATIS.
"RWY 10L, COND CODE, 5 5 5 AT, 1215Z". This was still posted on the 1451Z ATIS.
Video looks like they slid off the taxi way not the rwy.
pangolin is offline  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:26 PM
  #34  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,470
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Video looks like they slid off the taxi way not the rwy.
Tower needs to reconsider their reports. "RCC is 5/5/5, braking medium to poor at N3 and 4" That wasn't accurate at all, obviously.
And winds were reported at 360 at 17G24.
dera is online now  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:33 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Tower needs to reconsider their reports. "RCC is 5/5/5, braking medium to poor at N3 and 4" That wasn't accurate at all, obviously.

And winds were reported at 360 at 17G24.


555 can change to NIL in a matter of seconds. It’s always up to the PIC.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tring is offline  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:35 PM
  #36  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,470
Default

Originally Posted by Tring View Post
555 can change to NIL in a matter of seconds. It’s always up to the PIC.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm just saying they weren't intentionally breaking any regs or FM1 limitations. They were just given information that wasn't correct.
They were calling 18kt winds with no gusts only a few minutes after the event.
dera is online now  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:43 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
I'm just saying they weren't intentionally breaking any regs or FM1 limitations. They were just given information that wasn't correct.

They were calling 18kt winds with no gusts only a few minutes after the event.


I hear you. It’s very frustrating not knowing how slippery it is under your toes.

I was once told the FICON report was 555, and just below it was a PIREP saying braking action poor to nil with 500 foot from running off the end of the runway.

It’s all up to us i suppose.

It’s frustrating


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tring is offline  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:45 PM
  #38  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,470
Default

Originally Posted by Tring View Post
I hear you. It’s very frustrating not knowing how slippery it is under your toes.

I was once told the FICON report was 555, and just below it was a PIREP saying braking action poor to nil with 500 foot from running off the end of the runway.

It’s all up to us i suppose.

It’s frustrating


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a shame one of the busiest airports in the world can't provide a FICON that's less than an hour old, especially when PIREPs are calling for much worse braking action.
5/5/5 my stinking a**.

They ran off the runway before the point where tower called "medium to poor". So I think they had a reason to believe the action before that was "5".
dera is online now  
Old 11-11-2019, 05:50 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
It's a shame one of the busiest airports in the world can't provide a FICON that's less than an hour old, especially when PIREPs are calling for much worse braking action.

5/5/5 my stinking a**.



They ran off the runway before the point where tower called "medium to poor". So I think they had a reason to believe the action before that was "5".


Hear Hear!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tring is offline  
Old 11-11-2019, 06:37 PM
  #40  
Porco Rosso
 
ninerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Default

Originally Posted by NoValueAviator View Post
Odds they get fired?
You mean Envoy hasn't fired them yet, regardless of whether it would be fair to do so? What gives?
ninerdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotCrusader
Envoy Airlines
116
05-31-2016 09:02 AM
somedayillcare
Envoy Airlines
1
12-10-2014 02:30 AM
Romulus
Envoy Airlines
15
10-14-2014 06:34 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
29
02-02-2007 06:17 AM
Gordon C
Hangar Talk
2
07-30-2005 07:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices