![]() |
Envoy 2020
Welcome to 2020, Year of the Cost-Neutral Contract Negotiations.
No more CRJs. More new 175s. Possible used CPZ 175s. No more protected pilots. Here's to hoping for a higher flow rate and improved reserve rules! Cheers. |
Originally Posted by UnprotectdPilot
(Post 2952192)
Welcome to 2020, Year of the Cost-Neutral Contract Negotiations.
No more CRJs. More new 175s. Possible used CPZ 175s. No more protected pilots. Here's to hoping for a higher flow rate and improved reserve rules! Cheers. Cheers! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by UnprotectdPilot
(Post 2952192)
Welcome to 2020, Year of the Cost-Neutral Contract Negotiations.
No more CRJs. More new 175s. Possible used CPZ 175s. No more protected pilots. Here's to hoping for a higher flow rate and improved reserve rules! Cheers. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2952299)
And the first quarter that didn’t begin with a vacancy.
|
So someone I know interviewed for the east coast cheif pilot position. They were specifically looking for someone in Miami as they’ll be manning that office. According to them, during the interview process management said Miami will see a significant increase in flying in 2020 and they are prepping now for the growth. Hence the new Miami Cheif pilot position.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2112
(Post 2953016)
So someone I know interviewed for the east coast cheif pilot position. They were specifically looking for someone in Miami as they’ll be manning that office. According to them, during the interview process management said Miami will see a significant increase in flying in 2020 and they are prepping now for the growth. Hence the new Miami Cheif pilot position.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2112
(Post 2953016)
So someone I know interviewed for the east coast cheif pilot position. They were specifically looking for someone in Miami as they’ll be manning that office. According to them, during the interview process management said Miami will see a significant increase in flying in 2020 and they are prepping now for the growth. Hence the new Miami Cheif pilot position.
The 175 will see increased flying in New York, AAG is trying to get single class RJ's out of business markets. |
Anyone able to share what seniority number a DCL would need to hold a decent commutable line?
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2953019)
Not accurate. Miami is set at 50-65 lines for the foreseeable future. It will probably drop when the max comes back.
The 175 will see increased flying in New York, AAG is trying to get single class RJ's out of business markets. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2953020)
Anyone able to share what seniority number a DCL would need to hold a decent commutable line?
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2953073)
I’m just short of three years and can’t hold a line DCL and will be loosing relative seniority at least the next four months so will be over three years to see a line.
|
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2953102)
Good god seriously? Well there goes that idea for awhile lol.
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2953019)
Not accurate. Miami is set at 50-65 lines for the foreseeable future. It will probably drop when the max comes back.
The 175 will see increased flying in New York, AAG is trying to get single class RJ's out of business markets. |
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2953172)
No. You aren't accurate. Previous poster correct. MIA set to grow.
|
Damn I wish I worked for Delta. Average bonus payout equal to two months pay. Cant wait to see what we get lol.
|
Originally Posted by 6ix9ineYearFlow
(Post 2956401)
You make a lot of assertions and have a lot of insider information for someone that allegedly flowed to AA. Time to go back to TalkAirline and rattle off the 2021 paranoia.
|
So whos got a sneak peak at the numbers for the next vacancy bid
|
Originally Posted by 6ix9ineYearFlow
(Post 2956401)
You make a lot of assertions and have a lot of insider information for someone that allegedly flowed to AA. Time to go back to TalkAirline and rattle off the 2021 paranoia.
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2958546)
I wouldn't waste my time with a forum that is long vacant and dusty where someone just forgot to turn out the lights. There is one guy there in that empty house ranting about 2021 to nothing but echoes. He has no idea at all what is happening now much less in 2021. I've got news. 2020 AS WELL AS 2021 are going to be stunning for Envoy both in the amount of growth and the flow dropping to a very, very low number in years from new hire date to flow.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2958766)
So please, all knowing one. EXPLAIN HOW the flow can drastically be cut for new hires when twice as many are being hired as flow. If you have all this inside knowledge just show the math.
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2958891)
Simple. Retirements. Go take a look at the AA retirements over the next 3 years alone and get back to me. The flow will be enhanced greatly. For one, look at the loads of pipeline instructor talent Envoy has on the sideline matriculating in as fast as training can CURRENTLY process them. Those guys are being hired for American Airlines and as I've said before, Envoy has the corner market on the pipeline program. It has proven to be the best thing since sliced bread. I'm personally an advocate of Envoy hiring ONLY pipeline candidates. Why hire a military guy who just needs to get the 121 time on the resume and will leave soon after? Or, is it necessary to hire Jim Bob Moses who has been flying a Baron for Wildcatter Oil as an Envoy/AA pilot? The answer is no. He doesn't fit the mold at all. And with the pipeline numbers in the waiting room, there are your AA pilots.
Can you please have a meeting with your contacts to give us “The Envoy” pilots an AA # now, so we don’t jump ship for a moms and pops joint like an ACMI or ULCC. |
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2953172)
No. You aren't accurate. Previous poster correct. MIA set to grow.
You're a sock/troll account anyways. |
Anyways, to get this forum back on track, any potential New Hires can expect the 175.
102 175 FO slots 55 145 FO slots Nothing for NY either, not that it'd be hard to transfer there if you want it. |
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2958891)
Simple. Retirements. Go take a look at the AA retirements over the next 3 years alone and get back to me. The flow will be enhanced greatly. For one, look at the loads of pipeline instructor talent Envoy has on the sideline matriculating in as fast as training can CURRENTLY process them. Those guys are being hired for American Airlines and as I've said before, Envoy has the corner market on the pipeline program. It has proven to be the best thing since sliced bread. I'm personally an advocate of Envoy hiring ONLY pipeline candidates. Why hire a military guy who just needs to get the 121 time on the resume and will leave soon after? Or, is it necessary to hire Jim Bob Moses who has been flying a Baron for Wildcatter Oil as an Envoy/AA pilot? The answer is no. He doesn't fit the mold at all. And with the pipeline numbers in the waiting room, there are your AA pilots.
Everyone knows the flow is not to staff AA. That doesn’t explain the math of how Envoy gets them there. Especially doesn’t explain how you can decrease the amount of time when hiring twice as many as flowing. But with the new vacancy, as well as the line count forecast, just proved you wrong about MIA, so I guess your info is, as everyone has said, nothing but BS propaganda. You admitted you were a little bit of a KoolAid drinker. Maybe you need your memory refreshed. There were only a few that survived and they DIDN’T drink the KoolAid. They escaped. So you just keep chug a lugging. |
Originally Posted by speedbrakearmed
(Post 2958926)
Anyways, to get this forum back on track, any potential New Hires can expect the 175.
102 175 FO slots 55 145 FO slots Nothing for NY either, not that it'd be hard to transfer there if you want it. |
Originally Posted by Tyrion
(Post 2958967)
Those slots are more for facilitating base transfers. They can quickly become meaningless when new hires show up to class. New hires should still expect ORD 175 and LGA 145 for the near future.
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2958891)
Simple. Retirements. Go take a look at the AA retirements over the next 3 years alone and get back to me. The flow will be enhanced greatly. For one, look at the loads of pipeline instructor talent Envoy has on the sideline matriculating in as fast as training can CURRENTLY process them. Those guys are being hired for American Airlines and as I've said before, Envoy has the corner market on the pipeline program. It has proven to be the best thing since sliced bread. I'm personally an advocate of Envoy hiring ONLY pipeline candidates. Why hire a military guy who just needs to get the 121 time on the resume and will leave soon after? Or, is it necessary to hire Jim Bob Moses who has been flying a Baron for Wildcatter Oil as an Envoy/AA pilot? The answer is no. He doesn't fit the mold at all. And with the pipeline numbers in the waiting room, there are your AA pilots.
|
Originally Posted by rkd19
(Post 2959114)
Except the fact that AA released numbers for hiring and it accounts for 20/month flow from Envoy and massive off the street hiring. So who's lying, you or AA?
|
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 2959149)
The question is will AA start hiring more from MQ. That’s the only way a 5-6 year flow makes sense
|
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 2959079)
LGA has more than double the FOs as lines. LGA is as overstaffed as possible.
|
Originally Posted by Tyrion
(Post 2959212)
Right, but with this bid, several LGA FO's will transfer to other bases leaving backfills to be filled by new hires. Every FO position has at least 1 reserve for every 2 lineholders. Over staffing is the Envoy way.
|
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2959170)
Envoy pilots getting hired off the street decreases flow, not increase. Since we will be flowing based on the lower of a percentage of pilots on the seniority list. If we got all the way down to 480 pilots at Envoy it would still be an 8 year flow, becauce it's the lesser of pilots on property or based on 25% of Americans hiring, not the greater of. After DOS guys leaving above you does nothing to help your flow date.
Pilots leaving on top of you will speed the flow if Management can keep up with the attrition with new hires. If they cant then pilots leaving either side of you will theoretically slow your flow date. |
Originally Posted by moon
(Post 2959286)
Pilots leaving on top of you will speed the flow if Management can keep up with the attrition with new hires. If they cant then pilots leaving either side of you will theoretically slow your flow date.
|
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2959322)
Correct. If they can keep new hire rates higher than attrtition your flow will stay the same/be quicker. However if they can't keep up with attrtition your flow will slow down. We'll just have to see what happens this year.
|
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2959170)
Envoy pilots getting hired off the street decreases flow, not increase. Since we will be flowing based on the lower of a percentage of pilots on the seniority list. If we got all the way down to 480 pilots at Envoy it would still be an 8 year flow, becauce it's the lesser of pilots on property or based on 25% of Americans hiring, not the greater of. After DOS guys leaving above you does nothing to help your flow date.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2959331)
Everyone’s argument for decreased flow time don’t take into account the facts of this flow formula. As body count goes down, so does flow. And to the best of my knowledge, the arbitrated adjustment of a few per month of the PPs and the increase to the 10/11 group, adjustments to flow don’t affect current groups, any new agreements will affect new pilots. And there is still a lot of pilots that will have to flow at the lower rates.
|
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2959329)
Do you by chance know the seniority numbers that are flowing? Would be a good gauge to determine time frames.
|
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2959341)
Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but you can check the flow through selection page on the envoy website under flight.
|
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2959329)
Do you by chance know the seniority numbers that are flowing? Would be a good gauge to determine time frames.
|
Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
(Post 2959359)
Those who had the next class date as well as everyone who has been selected for flow were highlighted in the document that the union posted last week on the ALPA website including their seniority numbers.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:05 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands