Section 16
03-19-2020, 09:01 AM
#15
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 98
Originally Posted by dera
Whats confusing about it?
03-19-2020, 09:07 AM
#16
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,465
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2112
how can an ALPA/Envoy agreement dictate to american how to allocate regional flying. 2074 pilots need to stay employed or what’s needed to fly 60% of the Regional feed. What if envoy only gets 30% of that feed? We’re just super fat on pilots?
1302 was pre-merger.
03-19-2020, 10:49 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 545
Originally Posted by dera
You are missing the key part of that letter.
1302 was pre-merger.
1302 was pre-merger.
That letter won’t have much of an effect in the current environment. Almost everyone covered by that letter is gone. Also, the company tried to invoke Force Majoure to apply to a law passed by Congress that they’d known about for 3 years (Low Time FO grievance). Does anyone really think they won’t invoke it now when there ACTUALLY IS ONE?!
03-19-2020, 11:12 AM
#18
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,465
Originally Posted by But seriously
It does, however, specifically address what happens if AA merges with another airline.
That letter won’t have much of an effect in the current environment. Almost everyone covered by that letter is gone. Also, the company tried to invoke Force Majoure to apply to a law passed by Congress that they’d known about for 3 years (Low Time FO grievance). Does anyone really think they won’t invoke it now when there ACTUALLY IS ONE?!
That letter won’t have much of an effect in the current environment. Almost everyone covered by that letter is gone. Also, the company tried to invoke Force Majoure to apply to a law passed by Congress that they’d known about for 3 years (Low Time FO grievance). Does anyone really think they won’t invoke it now when there ACTUALLY IS ONE?!
03-20-2020, 05:42 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,127
Originally Posted by dera
Exactly. Long story short, our lifers are safeish. The 2074 number does not apply.
03-20-2020, 06:53 AM
#20
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 270
Originally Posted by Cujo665
the language went from arguing number of pilots, to pilots on the list at DOS. It’s one of the issues I was against. Sucks being proven right, even this many years later. I wish I’d have fought harder.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
