Section 16
#15
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
#16
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 102
From: Whale FO
1302 was pre-merger.
#17
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 638
Likes: 12
It does, however, specifically address what happens if AA merges with another airline.
That letter won’t have much of an effect in the current environment. Almost everyone covered by that letter is gone. Also, the company tried to invoke Force Majoure to apply to a law passed by Congress that they’d known about for 3 years (Low Time FO grievance). Does anyone really think they won’t invoke it now when there ACTUALLY IS ONE?!
That letter won’t have much of an effect in the current environment. Almost everyone covered by that letter is gone. Also, the company tried to invoke Force Majoure to apply to a law passed by Congress that they’d known about for 3 years (Low Time FO grievance). Does anyone really think they won’t invoke it now when there ACTUALLY IS ONE?!
#18
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 102
From: Whale FO
It does, however, specifically address what happens if AA merges with another airline.
That letter won’t have much of an effect in the current environment. Almost everyone covered by that letter is gone. Also, the company tried to invoke Force Majoure to apply to a law passed by Congress that they’d known about for 3 years (Low Time FO grievance). Does anyone really think they won’t invoke it now when there ACTUALLY IS ONE?!
That letter won’t have much of an effect in the current environment. Almost everyone covered by that letter is gone. Also, the company tried to invoke Force Majoure to apply to a law passed by Congress that they’d known about for 3 years (Low Time FO grievance). Does anyone really think they won’t invoke it now when there ACTUALLY IS ONE?!
#19
the language went from arguing number of pilots, to pilots on the list at DOS. It’s one of the issues I was against. Sucks being proven right, even this many years later. I wish I’d have fought harder.
#20
Banned
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
False. You haven't been proven right on anything that you have opined her. Ever. This is just another example. You are just twisting the facts to engage with more false narratives.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



