Envoy Information
04-08-2014 | 12:54 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Cloud surfing
And we should keep saying no! As much time the keep dicking with us, more people will jump the ship, then at the end they won't even have the staffing to fly those airplanes.
I heard that MESA, RAH and PSA says no to AAG request for them to fly the 175s. Also heard today that apparently AAG went to Silver Airways and they also turned them down since they can't recruit enough people.
I heard that MESA, RAH and PSA says no to AAG request for them to fly the 175s. Also heard today that apparently AAG went to Silver Airways and they also turned them down since they can't recruit enough people.
04-08-2014 | 12:56 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
04-08-2014 | 01:00 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
04-08-2014 | 01:39 PM
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
What new base? When was this announcement (post failed TA by pilot group?) and where will the new base be?
04-08-2014 | 01:58 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,867
Likes: 117
30 CA and 30 FO positions for CRJ DFW.
This came out one day after they "decided" to cancel the ORD vacancy for 30 CA for the CRJ. Clearly the first vacancy was a fake one...
The 30 CA positions are net upgrades, there's no displacement. A lot of the 824 group are leaving to other carriers. I guess the company real intention is to scare away as much sr people as they can to lower longevity even more.
This came out one day after they "decided" to cancel the ORD vacancy for 30 CA for the CRJ. Clearly the first vacancy was a fake one...
The 30 CA positions are net upgrades, there's no displacement. A lot of the 824 group are leaving to other carriers. I guess the company real intention is to scare away as much sr people as they can to lower longevity even more.
04-08-2014 | 02:34 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
30 CA and 30 FO positions for CRJ DFW.
This came out one day after they "decided" to cancel the ORD vacancy for 30 CA for the CRJ. Clearly the first vacancy was a fake one...
The 30 CA positions are net upgrades, there's no displacement. A lot of the 824 group are leaving to other carriers. I guess the company real intention is to scare away as much sr people as they can to lower longevity even more.
This came out one day after they "decided" to cancel the ORD vacancy for 30 CA for the CRJ. Clearly the first vacancy was a fake one...
The 30 CA positions are net upgrades, there's no displacement. A lot of the 824 group are leaving to other carriers. I guess the company real intention is to scare away as much sr people as they can to lower longevity even more.
Expect maybe less than 5 net upgrades the most. This will go VERY SENIOR.
04-08-2014 | 02:54 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
You sure they can bid it? Wasn't that the point of pay banding. It's going to go to new upgrades, as no one is being displace right now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
