Envoy's CRJ's to PSA
09-04-2014 | 08:08 PM
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
I hope Great Lakes votes in a concessionary contract to undercut PSA and steals all the airplanes. Already close to the bottom, might as well go all the way.
09-04-2014 | 08:13 PM
#52
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 588
Likes: 24
You would probably fail out of GLA, they don't offer 400 hr IOE programs. How is the sandwich assembly job at Subway going?
09-04-2014 | 08:14 PM
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
I think we found ourselves a PSA'er. Get 'em boys.
09-04-2014 | 08:21 PM
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Chillax bra. You have the rest of your career to be hated by everyone, might want to lay low while you still can.
09-04-2014 | 08:38 PM
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Ok, time to grow up and face the facts.
PSA pilots have as much to do with the 700's coming to PSA as the PDT pilots.
We voted and passed a similar TA that was offered to Envoy. It was to receive CRJ 900's in exchange for the 12/4 pay freezes.
The TA had and has nothing to do with the 700's coming to PSA. That was all the doing of Envoy MEC not playing ball with Parker.
These guys gave you 3 chances. Each time you said no. So they gave up trying to negotiate and is now back to running 5 airlines. PSA pilots don't want your 700's, but it is your doing not ours.
PSA pilots have as much to do with the 700's coming to PSA as the PDT pilots.
We voted and passed a similar TA that was offered to Envoy. It was to receive CRJ 900's in exchange for the 12/4 pay freezes.
The TA had and has nothing to do with the 700's coming to PSA. That was all the doing of Envoy MEC not playing ball with Parker.
These guys gave you 3 chances. Each time you said no. So they gave up trying to negotiate and is now back to running 5 airlines. PSA pilots don't want your 700's, but it is your doing not ours.
09-04-2014 | 08:43 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Wow, this is what I'm talking about. Whatever helps you sleep at night. Ever wonder why we didn't "play ball with Parker?" We have a contract, a concessionary bankruptsy one at that. Tell me, what was there to negotiate?? We have competitive rates for both the -700, -900 and 175. What did we have to negotiate over?? Please, enlighten me!! Was AAG facing bankruptcy or cash-strapped that they needed more from us?? You are a POS if you believe the crap coming out of your mouth.
09-04-2014 | 09:01 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Waitttt, you're saying it was a sham bankruptcy?! Wow, I had no idea!! Now if you could only get our bankruptcy laws changed that would be greattttt. We were presented with an 1113 that would have effectively put us on par with Great Lakes. Real threat to shut you down? Please. You caved at the first opportunity for growth knowing it was not only at the expense of another carrier (eagle) but also knowing you were setting the bar lower for any upcoming regional contract negotiations, during a time when the laws of supply and demand says it should be set higher. Get it?
09-04-2014 | 09:07 PM
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: B737
Bring me up to date on that story please lol I never got the full story on that while I was at eagle other than they had crappy maintenance and was flying around with disabled fire loops on a engine for getting false readings lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Danger Dan
Regional
0
01-27-2009 08:54 PM
