ATTN: Envoy NYC based Pilots.
03-20-2015 | 06:33 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Was there anywhere besides the turboprop operators that had the 10 multi? If I remember, it was only PDT with zero multi required. The jets that went as low as 250 were mostly 100 multi. Even then, there was not a huge amount of 250 guys. The ones that came through eagle had a 30% washout rate. But back then, you could easily replace them with another until you got one worth a damn.
03-20-2015 | 06:51 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Honestly, the turboprop guys are the ones that need the multi time more. I am typed on three jets, but the most difficult v1 cuts I did were in the BE 1900.
03-20-2015 | 06:56 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
It has less to do with 2 engines and more to do with speed and complexity.
I flew with plenty 250 hour wonders and low time multi guys. Some were really good. For the most part though, Low total time and low multi time guys hang on to the tail of the aircraft a lot longer and are a nuisance rather than a help on the flight deck.
I flew with plenty 250 hour wonders and low time multi guys. Some were really good. For the most part though, Low total time and low multi time guys hang on to the tail of the aircraft a lot longer and are a nuisance rather than a help on the flight deck.
03-20-2015 | 08:53 PM
#16
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
03-20-2015 | 09:40 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
