Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > ExpressJet
United looking at ExpressJet article... >

United looking at ExpressJet article...

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

United looking at ExpressJet article...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2017 | 12:21 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flogger
All of this is moot to the ATL and DFW side of the house. The ASA side of the house has been burned to the ground. Even if the XJT side somehow survives with a United deal, it will mean the end of DFW. Such a shame.
Probably, but DFW was shut down long ago when DAL left. The AAL thing was only temporary until Inc could cover it.
I do think there will be a TYS base. Not ATL, but closer than EWR.
The ERJ plan was based upon CRJ folks coming over to help staff UAL flying. After 1 Jan any remaining will probably leave. I’ve heard rumors of 300 turning in their 2 week notices.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 01:22 PM
  #42  
Not at work
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: 737 ca
Default

For $1.3b United could buy a controlling stake in inc. Insert officers and transefer xjt to uch then dismantle and sell the parts of skywest to the other regionals to recoup the purchace price. A non union entity would be easy to piece apart and sell.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 06:00 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by blockplus
For $1.3b United could buy a controlling stake in inc. Insert officers and transefer xjt to uch then dismantle and sell the parts of skywest to the other regionals to recoup the purchace price. A non union entity would be easy to piece apart and sell.
I'd celebrate with a nice stogie and a bottle of my best bourbon if UCH really did this. In reality, it's a pipe dream.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 06:51 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by blockplus
For $1.3b United could buy a controlling stake in inc. Insert officers and transefer xjt to uch then dismantle and sell the parts of skywest to the other regionals to recoup the purchace price. A non union entity would be easy to piece apart and sell.
Why would they do that? 1.3B would buy them 250 narrowbody jets ....
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 07:13 PM
  #45  
PontiusPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Reverse Cowgirl
Default

Originally Posted by N1234
Why would they do that? 1.3B would buy them 250 narrowbody jets ....
To watch the world burn.
Reply
Old 12-15-2017 | 07:14 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by N1234
Why would they do that? 1.3B would buy them 250 narrowbody jets ....
for fun and because they can, they did it to air wisconsin
Reply
Old 12-16-2017 | 05:56 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by N1234
Why would they do that? 1.3B would buy them 250 narrowbody jets ....
As UAL is finding out, without smaller jets you don’t have the feed to fill up larger jets. The majority of those traveling on regional jets are going to larger jets. DAL and AAL have figured this out.
Normally the larger the jet the less cost per seat/mile, but the larger cost per leg. Meaning if that large jet is filled it kills on the route- which is why DAL regularly ran L-1011’s between ATL-MCO and I think they still occasionally run 777’s on that route. But if that larger jet is not past the break even point it really begins to cost, as UAL found out when they started running empty 747’s after the Asia traffic collapse.
Some city pairings will never be able to support anything larger than a regional jet. So it will either be that feeding or nothing.
Reply
Old 12-20-2017 | 01:54 PM
  #48  
HuntinFishin's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: In reverse
Default Q: How many 175s does XJT fly

A: 0 One of the biggest takeaways I got from the article was how UAL wanted to be able to add more 76 seat jets but is limited buy pilot scope. However they are opening contract talks about getting relief to add more. So whatever is happening has no real benefit to XJT. I think stINC and UAL are talking but nothing that helps us XJT. XJT may have been in the discussion to the reporters only to create the illusion of hope. The passing of the all call with no statement public or otherwise reinforces my feelings in this.
Reply
Old 12-20-2017 | 03:00 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Arrgh Jay
Default

Originally Posted by HuntinFishin
A: 0 One of the biggest takeaways I got from the article was how UAL wanted to be able to add more 76 seat jets but is limited buy pilot scope. However they are opening contract talks about getting relief to add more. So whatever is happening has no real benefit to XJT. I think stINC and UAL are talking but nothing that helps us XJT. XJT may have been in the discussion to the reporters only to create the illusion of hope. The passing of the all call with no statement public or otherwise reinforces my feelings in this.


This. And it gave the stock a little boost...and investors more confidence.
Reply
Old 12-20-2017 | 06:36 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Admiral
Default

Not trying to throw any grenades here, but how do you guys foresee United being able to purchase ExpressJet when they are limited to only owning a minority stake (due to the UA flight attendant contracts). Would Skywest be interested in only selling a minority share of the company?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5416
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
Duct Mon
Regional
266
07-31-2015 06:55 PM
aileronjam
United
7
07-10-2012 09:35 PM
JoeyMeatballs
ExpressJet
47
10-25-2007 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices