Time for new thread!! TA passes 90%
09-27-2018, 08:27 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 559
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Anybody remember a long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away when Skywest pilots agreed to fly 70 seat jets for 50 seat pay?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
XJT is 110/hr + $8,000.
That’s not so far off.
09-27-2018, 08:45 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: Reverse Cowgirl
Posts: 418
Originally Posted by da42pilot
Endeavor rates for captain tops out at 122/hr.
XJT is 110/hr + $8,000.
That’s not so far off.
XJT is 110/hr + $8,000.
That’s not so far off.
Come to a regional and upgrade quickly, enjoy good work rules and respectable pay, and move on to a major or legacy in 4-5 years. That's the standard formula that most regional pilots are looking for, and fortunately this new contract is the first step in delivering that.
09-27-2018, 08:47 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 559
Originally Posted by PontiusPilot
People place too much emphasis on top-out rates, which most of the pilot group should hope to never see.
Come to a regional and upgrade quickly, enjoy good work rules and respectable pay, and move on to a major or legacy in 4-5 years. That's the standard formula that most regional pilots are looking for, and fortunately this new contract is the first step in delivering that.
Come to a regional and upgrade quickly, enjoy good work rules and respectable pay, and move on to a major or legacy in 4-5 years. That's the standard formula that most regional pilots are looking for, and fortunately this new contract is the first step in delivering that.
09-27-2018, 08:50 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: Reverse Cowgirl
Posts: 418
Originally Posted by da42pilot
We have A LOT of very senior guys who already have topped out or are close to topping out.
09-27-2018, 09:38 AM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
This vote was really a no-brainer. If we don't get the -175s AND we are not sold by Inc we go back to Section 6 negotiations 1 February and get paid more while they drag it out. In this case, it's nothing more than a 4-month extension.
09-27-2018, 09:52 AM
#17
On Reserve
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by Blackhawk
This vote was really a no-brainer. If we don't get the -175s AND we are not sold by Inc we go back to Section 6 negotiations 1 February and get paid more while they drag it out. In this case, it's nothing more than a 4-month extension.
Hook line and sinker.
Let me tell you how this is going to go.
09-27-2018, 09:54 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Arrgh Jay
Posts: 350
Originally Posted by Blackhawk
If we don't get the -175s AND we are not sold by Inc we go back to Section 6 negotiations 1 February and get paid more while they drag it out. In this case, it's nothing more than a 4-month extension.
'We' voted in a TA that DOES NOT currently have that language. Perhaps it was 'mistakenly' included in a prior release, but that is NOT what was ratified this morning.
Congrats, indeed.
09-27-2018, 09:57 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 559
Originally Posted by push4dough
Get out of here with that junk.
Endeavor tops out at year 15. XJT is 20% longer!
DENIED
Endeavor tops out at year 15. XJT is 20% longer!
DENIED
Out rates top out at year 18, endeavor at 15.... still a good difference, but not one that warrants your attitude.
09-27-2018, 10:09 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Originally Posted by DownInPetaluma
I'm not seeing this written anywhere at this time.
'We' voted in a TA that DOES NOT currently have that language. Perhaps it was 'mistakenly' included in a prior release, but that is NOT what was ratified this morning.
Congrats, indeed.
'We' voted in a TA that DOES NOT currently have that language. Perhaps it was 'mistakenly' included in a prior release, but that is NOT what was ratified this morning.
Congrats, indeed.
No. I don’t trust management. But I do trust the MEC. There will be a melt down of epic proportions if it turns out not to be there.
Time will tell. Either something better is coming, or if not those who remain get paid more while this place winds down. You’re absolutely illogical in this. You think we are going to be wound down. What... in 3 years or so? Section 6 negotiations, if are are wound down, will take at least that long. Might as well get paid more in the process. Or if I offered you free money would you actually turn it down?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
