Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

The Deal's Not Done

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2019, 02:12 PM
  #241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by drywhitetoast View Post
First, UA doesn't owe you any explanation. I bombed the first interview and didn't get an explanation. Second. The folks saying they have no idea why they go dropped out off the cpp during the final review. I guarantee there is a good reason. Some are embarrassed to admit. Some ticked off. It's easier when you know you have something in your background and hoping they won't catch it to tell everyone you don't know why you got dropped out of the program. But whether they admit it or not there was something in their background.
It's been verified by ALPA and others including the CPP liaison that a certain number of people passed the hogan, interview, and were placed in the pool and then turned down in the final review. Those people had none of the disqualifiers on their records stated in the written CPP agreement. You're correct, United doesn't owe anyone an explanation. But they can't string people along for a couple years like that and then expect people to believe in the program when those stories get out there.
BusBoy88 is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 02:14 PM
  #242  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,688
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
I get that, but many people seemed shocked or even betrayed if they didn’t get a job offer. I have flown with several of the captains who have been very involved in the interview process. They said that the majority of those who were turned down was due to how they conducted themselves at the interviews, not some skeleton in their closet. For those who treated the interview as one of the biggest days of their lives and prepared accordingly, they did well. Those who didn’t do well came across as acting like the interview as a formality or that they were already flying for United.
It's all over the board. But those that treated it as you say screwed it up for A LOT of good candidates, PERIOD.
John Carr is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 02:28 PM
  #243  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by PhantomHawk View Post
It should be ONE interview, not two. The final review should be a training/attendance/legal review. That’s it. Once you pass the interview, you should be in the pool, and it’s essentially yours to lose. The final review should be transparent, and limited to the items as claimed. Nobody should have to THINK they are in the pool and stick around for 2 more years.....only to be told NO at the review, with no actual explanation that matches what was stated as disqualifying items. (Yes, it has happened)
The problem with only the one interview up front is that many new pilots at the regionals don’t have enough experience to do well in an interview. I’d hate to see a good applicant have a strike against them because they weren’t ready 4-5 years ago. One way around that is to require an applicant to have something like 2,000 PIC jet and a degree before they can enter the program. At that point they would be ready to not only do well on their interview, but do well in training also. Sign a statement giving the company permission to review your training and disciplinary records when you apply to the program. If you pass that you are given the Hogan and an interview. Pass both and you are hired, not sentenced to swim in the pool wondering if you are hired or not.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 02:33 PM
  #244  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,688
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
One way around that is to require an applicant to have something like 2,000 PIC jet and a degree before they can enter the program.
They've had more than a few FO's go, NO PIC time. Granted, sure, they sat FO a long time and bypassed upgrade. But NEVER upgraded. "Can't change the past"......

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
At that point they would be ready to not only do well on their interview, but do well in training also.
CA's have gone over and had problems, but so have FO's.

There's no simple solutions.
John Carr is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 02:39 PM
  #245  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 22
Default

Where are you all seeing anything saying that this will be industry leading? I looked back through both company messages and don't see those words or anything implying that.
beefburrito is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 02:58 PM
  #246  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 176
Default

We will now move our attention to the ERJ145 Captain open slots. Bid 19-06 should be out within a couple of weeks and in a preliminary look we could see pilots with a 2018 hire date being awarded an ERJ145 Captain slot. This concerns me that we will rapidly burn through First Officers in subsequent bids that have 1,000 hours of part 121 flight time needed to upgrade. My request to current First Officers is to fly as much as you can to get the hours. We may run out of 1,000 hour 121 First Officers to upgrade in late 2020. We are currently evaluating our First Officer flight time qualifications to determine the actual point. We do not want to be forced into hiring Captains “off the street” to meet our Captain needs.
SeeYa is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 03:11 PM
  #247  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 273
Default

In The Same Letter:


Originally Posted by SeeYa View Post
We will now move our attention to the ERJ145 Captain open slots. Bid 19-06 should be out within a couple of weeks and in a preliminary look we could see pilots with a 2018 hire date being awarded an ERJ145 Captain slot. This concerns me that we will rapidly burn through First Officers in subsequent bids that have 1,000 hours of part 121 flight time needed to upgrade. My request to current First Officers is to fly as much as you can to get the hours. We may run out of 1,000 hour 121 First Officers to upgrade in late 2020. We are currently evaluating our First Officer flight time qualifications to determine the actual point. We do not want to be forced into hiring Captains “off the street” to meet our Captain needs.
Recruiting has leveled off in the last few weeks and we are aggressively blanketing social media, intensifying our college visits, doling out $2,500 employee referral bonuses, advertising and hitting the email campaign trail. We have a great story to tell about our growth, competitive pay within our peer group and domiciles. It is a very intense environment out there but we do have a lot to offer. Your assistance in making a positive impact with potential candidates that want to work here is greatly appreciated. New hires are part of the engine that will propel our continued growth strategy in all our aircraft types. Without pilots continuing to graduate at a 60+ rate each month, it will short circuit our planned growth in 2020 and beyond. Getting involved with the Recruiting department if you are an alumni from a college or university is always appreciated. We are in a battle to attract the “free agents” out there.


To increase our success with New Hire candidates, we have secured with FlightSafety a one week “pre-course” that covers general ground and turbojet sim training. Selected New Hires will attend this basic pre-program before they begin training at ExpressJet. Our goal is to match the ExpressJet ground and sim footprint for all candidates even if pilots lack recent currency or need a little help in understanding the airline environment. This “pre-course” will add significant costs, but we are hoping to make that up in (a) improved New Hire pilot success and (b) having our instructors focus on ExpressJet material – vs helping New Hires remedy core piloting skills. The first class will start this month and we will be gathering the metrics to judge the success.



The company CANNOT attract qualified applicants due to the bad QOL, pay and work rules along with no flow or real career progression.

They would rather pay for an expensive course to limp bottom barrel applicants along instead of attracting the best as Envoy, Endeavor, PSA, Republic and Skywest do.

Get pilots to recruit pilots (not F/A's) and improve the QOL (letter 2) stuff.
SureJetz is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 06:22 PM
  #248  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Default

Why does XJT use flight attendants as pilot recruiters instead of using pilots? Is it less expensive that way? How in the world is a FA going to be able to answer any of the technical and QOL inquiries that a potential hire would have? A “quality” candidate is going to be very put off by this. On a related note, who actually conducts the technical portion of the interview, or have those been dropped from the recruiting process? If so, there must be a correlation between that and the higher number of failures. As far as the new one week course goes, maybe they can teach some English as a second language along with the other topics. It’s starting to sound a lot more like Mesa on the radio these days.
piloto2 is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 07:17 PM
  #249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 213
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2 View Post
Why does XJT use flight attendants as pilot recruiters instead of using pilots? Is it less expensive that way? How in the world is a FA going to be able to answer any of the technical and QOL inquiries that a potential hire would have? A “quality” candidate is going to be very put off by this. On a related note, who actually conducts the technical portion of the interview, or have those been dropped from the recruiting process? If so, there must be a correlation between that and the higher number of failures. As far as the new one week course goes, maybe they can teach some English as a second language along with the other topics. It’s starting to sound a lot more like Mesa on the radio these days.


Interviewed recently, both HR people but one was a pilot for the company at one time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HighWingingIt is offline  
Old 10-02-2019, 07:26 PM
  #250  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf View Post
I don’t think we will get a flow. What is the primary purpose of the CPP from United’s perspective?

1. To keep the regional feed staffed. This is the primary goal. The carrot on the stick. It will still be a gimmick to some degree. At the end of the day the primary purpose of the program is marketing the regionals to potential new hires.

2. To assist them in meeting their hiring needs. In the hiring environment of the next 2-3 years it is likely that United will have to become a little less selective. For the next year or two they are likely to continue to require a degree but as the pool of applicants without one grows they will have to back off of that.

What United has to do is a better job of marrying the 2 goals. The previous CPP became nothing but a marketing tool because they hired so few from the CPP and continued to hire primarily off the street. It got so bad that it lost all of its credibility as a recruiting tool. Thus the current need to revamp. It’s not meeting goal #1.

Will United find the right balance this time? We will see. I have my sincere doubts. It will sound good at first but as things play out it will become apparent that goal #2 isn’t really a goal at all. United will not show any preference whatsoever to CPP applicants vs. OTS applicants. The value as a recruiting tool will be good at first then lose credibility again as it becomes apparent it is just another facade. Then it will be time for a new revamp.

I hope I am wrong.
Note: Maybe this isn't Subodh?!

I agree. It is a delay tactic, won't be that great, they will announce a revamp...wash, rinse, repeat.
YANXJTPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shoelu
Southwest
0
11-03-2016 03:18 PM
CRM114
Domestic
4
06-18-2013 02:45 AM
Crawl
Hangar Talk
3
08-28-2011 04:54 AM
CH407
Hangar Talk
1
07-29-2009 08:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices