The Deal's Not Done
#241
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 163
First, UA doesn't owe you any explanation. I bombed the first interview and didn't get an explanation. Second. The folks saying they have no idea why they go dropped out off the cpp during the final review. I guarantee there is a good reason. Some are embarrassed to admit. Some ticked off. It's easier when you know you have something in your background and hoping they won't catch it to tell everyone you don't know why you got dropped out of the program. But whether they admit it or not there was something in their background.
#242
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,688
I get that, but many people seemed shocked or even betrayed if they didn’t get a job offer. I have flown with several of the captains who have been very involved in the interview process. They said that the majority of those who were turned down was due to how they conducted themselves at the interviews, not some skeleton in their closet. For those who treated the interview as one of the biggest days of their lives and prepared accordingly, they did well. Those who didn’t do well came across as acting like the interview as a formality or that they were already flying for United.
#243
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
It should be ONE interview, not two. The final review should be a training/attendance/legal review. That’s it. Once you pass the interview, you should be in the pool, and it’s essentially yours to lose. The final review should be transparent, and limited to the items as claimed. Nobody should have to THINK they are in the pool and stick around for 2 more years.....only to be told NO at the review, with no actual explanation that matches what was stated as disqualifying items. (Yes, it has happened)
#244
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,688
There's no simple solutions.
#246
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 176
We will now move our attention to the ERJ145 Captain open slots. Bid 19-06 should be out within a couple of weeks and in a preliminary look we could see pilots with a 2018 hire date being awarded an ERJ145 Captain slot. This concerns me that we will rapidly burn through First Officers in subsequent bids that have 1,000 hours of part 121 flight time needed to upgrade. My request to current First Officers is to fly as much as you can to get the hours. We may run out of 1,000 hour 121 First Officers to upgrade in late 2020. We are currently evaluating our First Officer flight time qualifications to determine the actual point. We do not want to be forced into hiring Captains “off the street” to meet our Captain needs.
#247
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 273
In The Same Letter:
Recruiting has leveled off in the last few weeks and we are aggressively blanketing social media, intensifying our college visits, doling out $2,500 employee referral bonuses, advertising and hitting the email campaign trail. We have a great story to tell about our growth, competitive pay within our peer group and domiciles. It is a very intense environment out there but we do have a lot to offer. Your assistance in making a positive impact with potential candidates that want to work here is greatly appreciated. New hires are part of the engine that will propel our continued growth strategy in all our aircraft types. Without pilots continuing to graduate at a 60+ rate each month, it will short circuit our planned growth in 2020 and beyond. Getting involved with the Recruiting department if you are an alumni from a college or university is always appreciated. We are in a battle to attract the “free agents” out there.
To increase our success with New Hire candidates, we have secured with FlightSafety a one week “pre-course” that covers general ground and turbojet sim training. Selected New Hires will attend this basic pre-program before they begin training at ExpressJet. Our goal is to match the ExpressJet ground and sim footprint for all candidates even if pilots lack recent currency or need a little help in understanding the airline environment. This “pre-course” will add significant costs, but we are hoping to make that up in (a) improved New Hire pilot success and (b) having our instructors focus on ExpressJet material – vs helping New Hires remedy core piloting skills. The first class will start this month and we will be gathering the metrics to judge the success.
The company CANNOT attract qualified applicants due to the bad QOL, pay and work rules along with no flow or real career progression.
They would rather pay for an expensive course to limp bottom barrel applicants along instead of attracting the best as Envoy, Endeavor, PSA, Republic and Skywest do.
Get pilots to recruit pilots (not F/A's) and improve the QOL (letter 2) stuff.
We will now move our attention to the ERJ145 Captain open slots. Bid 19-06 should be out within a couple of weeks and in a preliminary look we could see pilots with a 2018 hire date being awarded an ERJ145 Captain slot. This concerns me that we will rapidly burn through First Officers in subsequent bids that have 1,000 hours of part 121 flight time needed to upgrade. My request to current First Officers is to fly as much as you can to get the hours. We may run out of 1,000 hour 121 First Officers to upgrade in late 2020. We are currently evaluating our First Officer flight time qualifications to determine the actual point. We do not want to be forced into hiring Captains “off the street” to meet our Captain needs.
To increase our success with New Hire candidates, we have secured with FlightSafety a one week “pre-course” that covers general ground and turbojet sim training. Selected New Hires will attend this basic pre-program before they begin training at ExpressJet. Our goal is to match the ExpressJet ground and sim footprint for all candidates even if pilots lack recent currency or need a little help in understanding the airline environment. This “pre-course” will add significant costs, but we are hoping to make that up in (a) improved New Hire pilot success and (b) having our instructors focus on ExpressJet material – vs helping New Hires remedy core piloting skills. The first class will start this month and we will be gathering the metrics to judge the success.
The company CANNOT attract qualified applicants due to the bad QOL, pay and work rules along with no flow or real career progression.
They would rather pay for an expensive course to limp bottom barrel applicants along instead of attracting the best as Envoy, Endeavor, PSA, Republic and Skywest do.
Get pilots to recruit pilots (not F/A's) and improve the QOL (letter 2) stuff.
#248
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Why does XJT use flight attendants as pilot recruiters instead of using pilots? Is it less expensive that way? How in the world is a FA going to be able to answer any of the technical and QOL inquiries that a potential hire would have? A “quality” candidate is going to be very put off by this. On a related note, who actually conducts the technical portion of the interview, or have those been dropped from the recruiting process? If so, there must be a correlation between that and the higher number of failures. As far as the new one week course goes, maybe they can teach some English as a second language along with the other topics. It’s starting to sound a lot more like Mesa on the radio these days.
#249
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 213
Why does XJT use flight attendants as pilot recruiters instead of using pilots? Is it less expensive that way? How in the world is a FA going to be able to answer any of the technical and QOL inquiries that a potential hire would have? A “quality” candidate is going to be very put off by this. On a related note, who actually conducts the technical portion of the interview, or have those been dropped from the recruiting process? If so, there must be a correlation between that and the higher number of failures. As far as the new one week course goes, maybe they can teach some English as a second language along with the other topics. It’s starting to sound a lot more like Mesa on the radio these days.
Interviewed recently, both HR people but one was a pilot for the company at one time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#250
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 83
I don’t think we will get a flow. What is the primary purpose of the CPP from United’s perspective?
1. To keep the regional feed staffed. This is the primary goal. The carrot on the stick. It will still be a gimmick to some degree. At the end of the day the primary purpose of the program is marketing the regionals to potential new hires.
2. To assist them in meeting their hiring needs. In the hiring environment of the next 2-3 years it is likely that United will have to become a little less selective. For the next year or two they are likely to continue to require a degree but as the pool of applicants without one grows they will have to back off of that.
What United has to do is a better job of marrying the 2 goals. The previous CPP became nothing but a marketing tool because they hired so few from the CPP and continued to hire primarily off the street. It got so bad that it lost all of its credibility as a recruiting tool. Thus the current need to revamp. It’s not meeting goal #1.
Will United find the right balance this time? We will see. I have my sincere doubts. It will sound good at first but as things play out it will become apparent that goal #2 isn’t really a goal at all. United will not show any preference whatsoever to CPP applicants vs. OTS applicants. The value as a recruiting tool will be good at first then lose credibility again as it becomes apparent it is just another facade. Then it will be time for a new revamp.
I hope I am wrong.
1. To keep the regional feed staffed. This is the primary goal. The carrot on the stick. It will still be a gimmick to some degree. At the end of the day the primary purpose of the program is marketing the regionals to potential new hires.
2. To assist them in meeting their hiring needs. In the hiring environment of the next 2-3 years it is likely that United will have to become a little less selective. For the next year or two they are likely to continue to require a degree but as the pool of applicants without one grows they will have to back off of that.
What United has to do is a better job of marrying the 2 goals. The previous CPP became nothing but a marketing tool because they hired so few from the CPP and continued to hire primarily off the street. It got so bad that it lost all of its credibility as a recruiting tool. Thus the current need to revamp. It’s not meeting goal #1.
Will United find the right balance this time? We will see. I have my sincere doubts. It will sound good at first but as things play out it will become apparent that goal #2 isn’t really a goal at all. United will not show any preference whatsoever to CPP applicants vs. OTS applicants. The value as a recruiting tool will be good at first then lose credibility again as it becomes apparent it is just another facade. Then it will be time for a new revamp.
I hope I am wrong.
I agree. It is a delay tactic, won't be that great, they will announce a revamp...wash, rinse, repeat.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post