Originally Posted by DirkDiggler (Post 3098196)

There will be no merger. They just drove TSA out of business a few months ago essentially. They will do the same again. Reset the longevity with fresh blood.

Originally Posted by ninerdriver (Post 3098213)

TSA drove itself out of business. HK is an asshat.

Originally Posted by idlethrust (Post 3098223)

how do you put a hat on an ass?? 😂😂😂

Originally Posted by tallpilot (Post 3098211)

Speculation:

United doesn’t care about a monopoly 145 operator because the airframe is going away. They’ll use it as a cheap stopgap for a year or two until demand comes back and they have time to figure out the rest of the fleet plan. Whoever ‘wins’ this ludicrous cage match is only delaying the inevitable for a few years before they too get the TSA treatment.

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy (Post 3098234)

Here's one way...https://i.pinimg.com/236x/04/83/15/0...ruth-hurts.jpg

Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat (Post 3098177)

UA should want both to survive. If it kills one then the remainder has a monopoly in the market. This is all just a game to drive down prices 'oh you bettee be cheaper than c5.' (Vice versa)......

Suppose either goes down....then two.months later there is no competition; this allows the surviving organisation to drive the contract back up. It just doesn't make sence.

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon (Post 3098272)

can’t be hard to negotiate a favorable contract with a company you own 49% of.

Originally Posted by StuckOnReserve (Post 3098293)

Unless the 51% owner wants to make a bigger profit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk