Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > ExpressJet
Will ExpressJet survive this? >

Will ExpressJet survive this?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Will ExpressJet survive this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2020 | 09:19 PM
  #1301  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by itsmytime
all this proves is that xjt is the choice. If they wanted c5, or didn’t care, c5 would already be the winner due to lower cost, the fact they are asking xjt for concessions means that’s who they want.

My thoughts as well
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 09:55 PM
  #1302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,290
Likes: 111
Default

Originally Posted by simscott
The difference in Year 1 and Year 18 Captain pay between the two airlines is $4. At 75 hrs a month that’s like $300/month difference. Are they really making a sink about this just to get XJT to match C5 pay scale? Seems like chump change. I would think no more ATP-CTP classes and new hire sign on bonuses will save $25k right there.

They want to shut down an airline over $4 pay difference? What gap are they trying to really close?
It's been explained already. But it's NOT just about that hourly number, it's about the longevity and everything that goes along with it. Primarily, vacation for XJT.

I don't know the vacation rules at C5, so I'm not comparing that.

And I wish I could remember even close to the number, it was a long, long, LONG time ago. And at that, a much less senior (less longevity) group.

But dusting off the cobwebs, vacation trip touch ALONE cost in the millions of dollars.

Never mind sick, training, DC contribution, what have you.

A "creative" pilot at XJT (at least when I left anyway) can effectively take half (or a little more) of the month off 7 months out of the year it they so choose.

Pilot overhead is "expensive".
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 10:50 PM
  #1303  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 94
Default

Not to mention.....the overall attitude of the groups is very different. XJT is like a dog who has been abused and just wants to bite now. The lack of demand makes this a perfect time to do all this. Shutter XJT, transfer planes to C5, and gradually hire whoever is needed once demand returns. It SUCKS, but it makes sense. A whole lot more sense than the theories of why XJT is the choice for who stays. I hope I’m wrong. Still plenty of good people at XJT.
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 11:29 PM
  #1304  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
Not to mention.....the overall attitude of the groups is very different. XJT is like a dog who has been abused and just wants to bite now. The lack of demand makes this a perfect time to do all this. Shutter XJT, transfer planes to C5, and gradually hire whoever is needed once demand returns. It SUCKS, but it makes sense. A whole lot more sense than the theories of why XJT is the choice for who stays. I hope I’m wrong. Still plenty of good people at XJT.
Other than the youngsters (and I totally get that), who the hell would go? That's laughable to me.
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 11:52 PM
  #1305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Arrgh Jay
Default

Originally Posted by FNietzsche
Other than the youngsters (and I totally get that), who the hell would go? That's laughable to me.
Unemployment beats that, no doubt. The entire vector has changed; even if you start over again there's no guarantee the career goes anywhere for years.
Reply
Old 07-29-2020 | 04:45 AM
  #1306  
cornerpocket's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 595
Likes: 73
Default

Originally Posted by climb150
So you think that being more established is the golden ticket? Expressjet has more overheads and a much more expensive workforce. It's much easier to grow a cheap operator than shrink a large expensive one.
One could posit that it's easier to shrink a large operator than to grow a smaller one. Growing an airline costs time and money. Two things to be carefully considered especially in an environment where human resources have been significantly scaled back. Contracts, including property leases, can and will be re-negotiated.

I don't think United is secretly conspiring against one company or another. The pilot group is only one piece of the labor puzzle and United will choose the operation that makes the best financial sense and meets the needs of United at the end of the day.
Reply
Old 07-29-2020 | 04:55 AM
  #1307  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default

With the parked aircraft everyone has and going into the fall with what appears to be weakening demand on top of traditional seasonal adjustments, I’m betting there is a UA fleet planner who has a plan that kills both xjet and c5, spreading the lift among the other regionals, and what they can’t do, backfilling with parked 737’s etc.
Both unions are under an ALPA gag order and neither union has to put concessions to a vote. We won’t know anything until it’s announced. Hope for the best (whatever that is anymore is anyone’s guess) and prepare for the worst. ~W
Reply
Old 07-29-2020 | 05:26 AM
  #1308  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by furloughfuntime
Lonestar only ever whines about bias, but never adds anything to the discussion or cites sources. He simply rejects facts he doesn't like. His posts can be safely ignored
Then ignore them and keep the blinders on that your news sources, even those written by someone from the "Stanford School of Journalism", are heavily biased to make sure Biden wins the election.
Reply
Old 07-29-2020 | 05:49 AM
  #1309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by cornerpocket
One could posit that it's easier to shrink a large operator than to grow a smaller one. Growing an airline costs time and money. Two things to be carefully considered especially in an environment where human resources have been significantly scaled back. Contracts, including property leases, can and will be re-negotiated.

I don't think United is secretly conspiring against one company or another. The pilot group is only one piece of the labor puzzle and United will choose the operation that makes the best financial sense and meets the needs of United at the end of the day.
You are correct but C5 and EV aren’t airlines. ExpressJet was one once. Add 145s to your flight planning software and any existing SoC can handle them. Line maintenance? Checking tire pressure, refilling oxygen bottles and deferring items is pretty much the same on every aircraft. Same with ground handling. Same with cabin crew. The only possible delay to moving these airplanes to another certificate is pilot training. But that isn’t an issue at all. There’s idle 145 sims all over the place and plenty of type rated out of work pilots to be instructors and more than enough flight instructors willing to work for far less than we are.

Critically, there is no damn hurry. The lift simply isn’t needed right now.

Your second paragraph is absolutely correct. It’s just business. Ruinous for a large group of people and a human travesty but business nonetheless.

Originally Posted by Group W Bench
With the parked aircraft everyone has and going into the fall with what appears to be weakening demand on top of traditional seasonal adjustments, I’m betting there is a UA fleet planner who has a plan that kills both xjet and c5, spreading the lift among the other regionals, and what they can’t do, backfilling with parked 737’s etc.
Both unions are under an ALPA gag order and neither union has to put concessions to a vote. We won’t know anything until it’s announced. Hope for the best (whatever that is anymore is anyone’s guess) and prepare for the worst. ~W
Absolutely. Make no mistake they are gaming multiple scenarios and have many possible solutions. United will live on but significant carnage will be left in its wake.
Reply
Old 07-29-2020 | 06:16 AM
  #1310  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by cornerpocket
One could posit that it's easier to shrink a large operator than to grow a smaller one. Growing an airline costs time and money. Two things to be carefully considered especially in an environment where human resources have been significantly scaled back. Contracts, including property leases, can and will be re-negotiated.

I don't think United is secretly conspiring against one company or another. The pilot group is only one piece of the labor puzzle and United will choose the operation that makes the best financial sense and meets the needs of United at the end of the day.
At the end of the day XJT has to be profitable to stay in business. UA wants to pay less for regional feed. If XJT can’t be profitable at the price UA wants to pay, then they won’t stay solvent. XJT’s only potentially controllable expense is payroll. There are ways to get it under control without asking concessions from the staff but they are limited. The letter was frank. I don’t think it was unreasonable given the circumstances. It’s been validated by UA as real and not just a rumor where XJT pilots take concessions and both airlines remain. XJT pilots need to make a decision. They could include language that if they are not the only 145 operator that rates snap back.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chrismo01
Delta
17
11-08-2019 05:35 PM
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 09:41 PM
Nevets
ExpressJet
6
01-15-2008 04:21 AM
Nevets
ExpressJet
44
12-17-2007 09:37 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
35
01-25-2007 04:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices