Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   ExpressJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/)
-   -   Will ExpressJet survive this? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/128757-will-expressjet-survive.html)

StuckOnReserve 04-07-2020 07:11 AM

Will ExpressJet survive this?
 

Originally Posted by calico (Post 3025923)
Curious why we are still proceeding with getting the ex TSA ships if Kirby wants to shut us down.


Wanting to be able to dump the 50 seat fleet and getting UAL pilots to agree to the scope changes (more 175’s) to make that happen are two different things. He also never said that he wants to shut XJT down. That’s just the conclusion that everyone is making.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Itsajob 04-07-2020 07:16 AM


Originally Posted by StuckOnReserve (Post 3025988)
Wanting to be able to dump the 50 seat fleet and getting UAL pilots to agree to the scope changes (more 175’s) to make that happen are two different things.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kirby has always wanted Scope relief, and he always will. I think that he was serious about eliminating 50 seat flying, but I don’t think he meant immediately. It will most likely play a part in the initial recovery and then be phased out as we come out of this over the next year or two. He has an option to get more regional rj’s, but he hasn’t exercised it yet. I don’t think that he wants to see anyone shut down, but when they decide to phase out the only aircraft that a company operates, it leaves them with few options.

ReadOnly7 04-07-2020 07:20 AM

Park the 145s
Round up all the UAL-owned 175s and bring them in-house
Merge C5 and XJT
Staple that ist to the UAL list.

All one happy family, no 50-seaters, no scope relief.

piloto2 04-07-2020 07:27 AM


Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 (Post 3026000)
Park the 145s
Round up all the UAL-owned 175s and bring them in-house
Merge C5 and XJT
Staple that list to the UAL list.

All one happy family, no 50-seaters, no scope relief.

Yeah, a staple behind all of the furloughed UAL pilots is going to make everyone happy, right?

ReadOnly7 04-07-2020 07:40 AM


Originally Posted by piloto2 (Post 3026011)
Yeah, a staple behind all of the furloughed UAL pilots is going to make everyone happy, right?

it might actually be a way to avoid furloughing.

and no.....there isn’t a way to make everyone happy.

Itsajob 04-07-2020 07:45 AM


Originally Posted by piloto2 (Post 3026011)
Yeah, a staple behind all of the furloughed UAL pilots is going to make everyone happy, right?

Would you rather have the same outcome and no staple? Unless the recovery is fairly quick, United will most likely retire the 756 and furlough, while operators of 50 seaters go away.

XJTFO 04-07-2020 07:46 AM

I am guessing anyone who talks about us being on the UA Seniority list is only joking, if not I would challenge your intellectuality.

Itsajob 04-07-2020 07:53 AM


Originally Posted by XJTFO (Post 3026055)
I am guessing anyone who talks about us being on the UA Seniority list is only joking, if not I would challenge your intellectuality.

United has been adamantly against flow, they’ll never go for a staple, even now.

Grumpyaviator 04-07-2020 07:57 AM

When furloughs are possible mainline pilots talk about “how nice it would be to have you guys on the list”. Otherwise it’s “you’re not good enough to be on our list”.

Happens every time there’s a downturn.

My bag will fit 04-07-2020 08:14 AM


Originally Posted by XJTFO (Post 3026055)
I am guessing anyone who talks about us being on the UA Seniority list is only joking, if not I would challenge your intellectuality.

I agree with your statement completely. It would solve their problems though with scope though. Slap everyone on at the bottom of the list in seniority order, and seat lock for 1 year CA and 2 years as an FO with modest regional payrates. I highly doubt any current mainline pilot will be begging for the chance to fly an outdated and cramped aircraft. However, this is a way the lifers still get their cushy schedules/pay, and if they decide to move off that airframe, it’s not like they are displacing anyone on a larger aircraft due to their low seniority. As for everyone else, we were already going to start at the bottom of the list once we moved to that final gig anyways. Oh.. and make all new hires fly the crappy old aircraft first as we have to maintain the “if I had to suffer, you have to suffer too” aviation mentality.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands