Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > ExpressJet
Expressjet 2013/2014 Contract >

Expressjet 2013/2014 Contract

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Expressjet 2013/2014 Contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:35 PM
  #111  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skigambia
Here is my dilemma, everything the no voters have said is accurate. There are concessionary aspects to this contract, which is an incredibly tough pill to swallow. I get sick at the thought of our mainline partners awarding 20+% raises, significant profit sharing checks in addition to an already disproportionate pay scale, but this contract, if approved, would still be the leading regional contract and the envy of every other connection carrier. As much as I would have liked to see the "bar" raised, is it realistic, or even attainable to expect anything better? After all it is "Industry Leading"! Im not a young, naive pilot, nor am I a lifer, and I honestly don't believe management is playing games. I would love this moment to begin a ground swell of support to get rid of ALPA, not because our MEC's failed us (they did better than every other pilot group in the industry), but because national sold the regionals out years ago.
What we have currently is better than this. So why would you vote yes, even if it is better than what the bottom feeders have?
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:40 PM
  #112  
JoeMerchant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by skigambia
Here is my dilemma, everything the no voters have said is accurate. There are concessionary aspects to this contract, which is an incredibly tough pill to swallow. I get sick at the thought of our mainline partners awarding 20+% raises, significant profit sharing checks in addition to an already disproportionate pay scale, but this contract, if approved, would still be the leading regional contract and the envy of every other connection carrier. As much as I would have liked to see the "bar" raised, is it realistic, or even attainable to expect anything better? After all it is "Industry Leading"! Im not a young, naive pilot, nor am I a lifer, and I honestly don't believe management is playing games. I would love this moment to begin a ground swell of support to get rid of ALPA, not because our MEC's failed us (they did better than every other pilot group in the industry), but because national sold the regionals out years ago.
Well said. The foundation to this problem was laid years ago when ALPA national and the mainline pilots botched the whole scope issue. Eventually, it doesn't matter how nice your house is if the foundation fails....
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:41 PM
  #113  
JoeMerchant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by atrdriver
What we have currently is better than this. So why would you vote yes, even if it is better than what the bottom feeders have?
Not on the ASA side. TA is a little better than current book overall.
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:43 PM
  #114  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 150
Likes: 26
From: Bus Driver
Default

Originally Posted by atrdriver
What we have currently is better than this. So why would you vote yes, even if it is better than what the bottom feeders have?
Thats part of my dilemma. I fully expect a fear campaign to begin immediately. I will closely follow what is being "threatened" and determine whether or not I believe the threats to be legitimate. I'm sure that there will be talk of significant fleet reduction if it's not passed. As hard as it is for me to take, but at this stage of the industry we are no different than Regional Elite, a contract service that is believed, and proven to be easily replaceable.
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:43 PM
  #115  
TBucket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Not on the ASA side. TA is a little better than current book overall.
I'm curious about this, Are you guys voting as one group, or does each side have to vote to accept it individually?
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:47 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant

If you are living in Never Never Land....Then it sucks......
You mean.....reality?
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:49 PM
  #117  
unit monster's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by atrdriver
a. A pilot will be paid and credited, at the applicable rate of pay
set forth in paragraph [A.], above, on a daily basis, the greater of:
(1) Paragraphs [1.b.] or [1.c.], below, for Continuous Duty Overnights (CDOs).
(2) Paragraphs [1.b.] or [1.d.], below for other than CDOs.
b. Block Hour Credit
The greater of actual or scheduled block time calculated on a leg-by-leg basis, including deadhead credit and any additional pay credits set forth in this Section.
c. Duty Hour Credit
1 minute of credit for each 2 minutes of originally scheduled duty time calculated for each duty period up to 12 hours of duty, and then 1 minute of credit for each 1 minute of originally scheduled duty time after 12 hours of duty.
d. Minimum Day Credit
3.86 hours of credit for each scheduled or actual calendar day of duty, and/or calendar day away from domicile. This provision will not apply to time spent in training (not including OE). For purposes of this paragraph, any trip that is scheduled to terminate prior to midnight LT but actually terminates between midnight LT and 0400 LT the following day will be paid a single minimum day credit.

1.c. applies only to CDOs now. Oh and notice that they pushed back the end of the day from 0200 to 0400. Another concession.
Originally Posted by atrdriver
Apparently we have some reading comprehension issues.

DUTY RIG HAS BEEN TAKEN AWAY except for CDOs. Daytime trips no longer receive duty rig. Another concession to add to the list.

-No Voter

Ouch! Nice catch! I read the important sections tonight, that duty rig blast just pushed me from a "pretty sure no" to "solidly fupm camp".

Seems we conceded rather than secured stronger language on three of my four top issues with C2007:
-stronger rigs (duty, min day, trip): GONE
-earlier PBS timeline: now one day later if falls in weekend/holiday
-strengthen reserve rules (moving days): status quo at a minimum

Out of the too four, retirement did increase. (ASA)
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:49 PM
  #118  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Not on the ASA side. TA is a little better than current book overall.
Incorrect. It's embarrassing (for you) to think anyone actually believes that.
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:50 PM
  #119  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Originally Posted by skigambia
Thats part of my dilemma. I fully expect a fear campaign to begin immediately. I will closely follow what is being "threatened" and determine whether or not I believe the threats to be legitimate. I'm sure that there will be talk of significant fleet reduction if it's not passed. As hard as it is for me to take, but at this stage of the industry we are no different than Regional Elite, a contract service that is believed, and proven to be easily replaceable.
I like your posts.

I have been thinking the same thing. 50 seaters all gone? 700's & 900's to someone else?

There will be a threat of some kind.
Reply
Old 11-21-2013 | 05:51 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NoHandHold
What did you all find so far that sounds the alarm?
-Duty rigs for non CDO trips

-Vacation bidding/vacation low

-Micro managed with third party reassignments/check ins

-Assignment of vacations

-reduction in 401K,increase in insurance


Basically the pay stays the same but the work rules go down. Not one positive towards this TA.

I was never an automatic no voter - I was willing to see the whole TA to make my decision. And my decision will not be emotionally based. It's a simple "no, we can do better".
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
Mitch Rapp05
United
49
11-22-2013 07:13 AM
Rogue24
Major
104
06-15-2012 04:49 AM
CAL73CAPT
United
18
01-16-2011 07:46 AM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices