![]() |
ExpressJet
I hear the bad stuff about XJT all the time.
Sonebody tell me good things. I know people are still going there. They see something most are overlooking. How's the United CPP working? What's the future like? Are the ERJ aircraft staying for a long time? Is IAH base staying? What's good? PS...I'm referring to L-XJT (UAX E135/E145/E145XR) |
You made a new thread for this? All these questions can be answered in the other post.
|
How's the United CPP working? Slower then molasses
What's the future like? Bleak Are the ERJ aircraft staying for a long time? 2 years maybe more, but who knows Is IAH base staying? time will tell What's good? Work rules |
So what have they put out internally about the 200 going away?? This represents 460~ pilots. Not good...
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2262016)
So what have they put out internally about the 200 going away?? This represents 460~ pilots. Not good...
2017 will continue our transition into a stronger, more stable and sustainable airline. There will be changes ahead of us, but also opportunities for success. In particular, today SkyWest, Inc. announced via a press release an upcoming change to the size of our CRJ fleet. Over the course of next year, we expect to transition to flying primarily dual-class aircraft in our CRJ operation and plan to start removing our CRJ200 aircraft as they come off contract with Delta, the majority of which come off in the second half of 2017. The removal of CRJ200 aircraft will improve our operating efficiency, as well as shift us to a fleet that provides better economics and increased profitability. We will continue to actively pursue economically sound flying opportunities. As the industry consolidates and opportunities arise, we will be ready, willing and able to deliver for our partners when others cannot. As Chip Childs, President and CEO of SkyWest, Inc. mentioned in the press release earlier today, “Streamlining ExpressJet’s CRJ operations reduces our risk profile and lowers future investment in the CRJ200 fleet that would have been required. These moves strategically position us to continue to deploy our capital against our best investment opportunities and are expected to help improve future liquidity and fleet flexibility.” The removal of CRJ200s will not impact the ERJ fleet. I know many of you have questions about our ongoing United negotiations. As of now, we continue to push for a mutually beneficial agreement for both companies, as our current contract with United is not set up to be financially successful for ExpressJet in the long run. In order for us to be a profitable and sustainable airline for the long-term future, we require necessary flexibility and operating efficiency to succeed in a hyper-competitive environment. Especially crucial to our success is acquiring flexibility in both our flying and labor contracts. Despite the challenges, both United and ExpressJet share a strong desire for us to continue flying the United Express product beyond 2019. The importance behind the changes we are making to our fleet structure cannot be understated. Restructuring our fleet will create new opportunities to increase productivity and efficiency throughout the network. Bigger is not always better, and we cannot become a successful and profitable airline without change. A smaller, but more stable, stronger, and profitable regional airline can and will provide opportunities in the long-term. 2018 particularly is anticipated to be a landmark year for ExpressJet’s financial health and commercial success. I, along with the entire ExpressJet leadership team and SkyWest, Inc. are in agreement that this is the path that will lead us to a successful and viable long-term future. With our talent pool, solid infrastructure and a significant workforce, ExpressJet remains a formidable player in the industry. |
Originally Posted by wmupilot85
(Post 2262040)
2017 Plans
2017 will continue our transition into a stronger, more stable and sustainable airline. There will be changes ahead of us, but also opportunities for success. In particular, today SkyWest, Inc. announced via a press release an upcoming change to the size of our CRJ fleet. Over the course of next year, we expect to transition to flying primarily dual-class aircraft in our CRJ operation and plan to start removing our CRJ200 aircraft as they come off contract with Delta, the majority of which come off in the second half of 2017. The removal of CRJ200 aircraft will improve our operating efficiency, as well as shift us to a fleet that provides better economics and increased profitability. We will continue to actively pursue economically sound flying opportunities. As the industry consolidates and opportunities arise, we will be ready, willing and able to deliver for our partners when others cannot. As Chip Childs, President and CEO of SkyWest, Inc. mentioned in the press release earlier today, “Streamlining ExpressJet’s CRJ operations reduces our risk profile and lowers future investment in the CRJ200 fleet that would have been required. These moves strategically position us to continue to deploy our capital against our best investment opportunities and are expected to help improve future liquidity and fleet flexibility.” The removal of CRJ200s will not impact the ERJ fleet. I know many of you have questions about our ongoing United negotiations. As of now, we continue to push for a mutually beneficial agreement for both companies, as our current contract with United is not set up to be financially successful for ExpressJet in the long run. In order for us to be a profitable and sustainable airline for the long-term future, we require necessary flexibility and operating efficiency to succeed in a hyper-competitive environment. Especially crucial to our success is acquiring flexibility in both our flying and labor contracts. Despite the challenges, both United and ExpressJet share a strong desire for us to continue flying the United Express product beyond 2019. The importance behind the changes we are making to our fleet structure cannot be understated. Restructuring our fleet will create new opportunities to increase productivity and efficiency throughout the network. Bigger is not always better, and we cannot become a successful and profitable airline without change. A smaller, but more stable, stronger, and profitable regional airline can and will provide opportunities in the long-term. 2018 particularly is anticipated to be a landmark year for ExpressJet’s financial health and commercial success. I, along with the entire ExpressJet leadership team and SkyWest, Inc. are in agreement that this is the path that will lead us to a successful and viable long-term future. With our talent pool, solid infrastructure and a significant workforce, ExpressJet remains a formidable player in the industry. |
So fast foward to 2018. And XJT could be just CRJ 700/900's. Thats 61 airplanes 600~ pilots. (Currently 2600~?). Seems they don't want to have anything to do with the E145 product or CRJ200's
|
Originally Posted by wmupilot85
(Post 2262040)
2017 Plans
"We will continue to actively pursue economically sound flying opportunities." "As the industry consolidates and opportunities arise, we will be ready, willing and able to deliver for our partners when others cannot." "With our talent pool, solid infrastructure and a significant workforce, ExpressJet remains a formidable player in the industry." |
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2262080)
So fast foward to 2018. And XJT could be just CRJ 700/900's. Thats 61 airplanes 600~ pilots. (Currently 2600~?). Seems they don't want to have anything to do with the E145 product or CRJ200's
As for the ERJ side, only the top level execs of Skywest/Expressjet know what the long range plan is. It will be reduced to around 100 a/c by the end of 2017, with expected further reductions in 2018. No current talk of dual class a/c for the ERJ side. Pretty gloomy picture for both sides to be honest. One other factor to consider: the Expressjet pilots will be entering negotiations for another try at a new contract in Oct 2017. Over the next year you will hear alot of doom and gloom and expectation management from our company leadership teams (Skywest and Expressjet). Every message from our leadership has some sort of expectation management in it. Don't expect much if any good news over the next year. |
The company comments about continuing long-term are a ruse. Once they are rid of the -200s they will start transferring-700s to SKYW. Inc has no intention of sustaining xjt long-term.
|
Originally Posted by Southern Fried
(Post 2262438)
From my perspective (15+ year captain) this is just more restructuring which is typical of Delta. I think the Delta side could see more dual class a/c. If you want to live in a Delta base as a regional pilot, plan on many changes in fleet count and base size.
|
Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
(Post 2262578)
How do you see more dual class aircraft at Delta? They are scoped out.
|
Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
(Post 2262559)
The company comments about continuing long-term are a ruse. Once they are rid of the -200s they will start transferring-700s to SKYW. Inc has no intention of sustaining xjt long-term.
|
Originally Posted by Southern Fried
(Post 2262582)
Good point. I don't know the current numbers to be honest.
|
Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
(Post 2262589)
The delivery of the Skywest 175's will take the large RJ's up to or within single digits of the 325 large RJ cap, as far I know.
|
Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
(Post 2262578)
How do you see more dual class aircraft at Delta? They are scoped out.
C-series it will allow more large RJs up to an overall cap, not sure on the numbers though. |
Scope Changes
Does anyone know the current scope at Delta as of the latest contract? I know management proposed relaxing it in September, but did not hear the result in the recently signed C16. Last I heard was 125 fifty sweaters and 223 dual class below 86,000.
|
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 2262598)
Does anyone know the current scope at Delta as of the latest contract? I know management proposed relaxing it in September, but did not hear the result in the recently signed C16. Last I heard was 125 fifty sweaters and 223 dual class below 86,000.
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2262603)
No scope change.. not sure if they get C series how that effects it..
Thanks. Filler... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 2262594)
I think Delta's scope grows with the number of small narrow body aircraft they add. If they start operating the
C-series it will allow more large RJs up to an overall cap, not sure on the numbers though. |
Looks like 450 total DCI
105 50 seats 102 70 seats 223 70-76seats Not sure which category the extra 20 can be |
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 2262637)
Looks like 450 total DCI
105 50 seats 102 70 seats 223 70-76seats Not sure which category the extra 20 can be Nice find, Happy. Appreciate the research. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Scope is locked at Delta for at least 20 years, this is it, there is no more room for expansion in the regionals with US carriers. If there is any expansion, it will be with NAI type carriers.
|
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 2262637)
Looks like 450 total DCI
105 50 seats 102 70 seats 223 70-76seats Not sure which category the extra 20 can be |
And yet there are still those that want to say SkyWest is going to keep the 50 seat planes.
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2237517)
I don't think SKYW ever made the statement to get out of the 50 seat market - at least not as far as I can recall or find.
Originally Posted by Hou757
(Post 2237442)
Please show us where Skywest said that! They've actually stated the opposite quite frequently.
How much bigger does the writing on the wall have to be for you people. And before everyone jumps on me again for bragging, I'm not. I am just trying to warn those looking at or working at XJT. XJT was a great airline until SkyWest screwed it up. |
Originally Posted by No Lies
(Post 2262771)
And yet there are still those that want to say SkyWest is going to keep the 50 seat planes.
Or this one in response to me stating skywest was getting out of the 50 seat market. If you saw the opposite quite frequently, then maybe you should stop reading the company propaganda and start reading the share holder info instead. How much bigger does the writing on the wall have to be for you people. And before everyone jumps on me again for bragging, I'm not. I am just trying to warn those looking at or working at XJT. XJT was a great airline until SkyWest screwed it up. |
Originally Posted by No Lies
(Post 2262771)
And yet there are still those that want to say SkyWest is going to keep the 50 seat planes.
Or this one in response to me stating skywest was getting out of the 50 seat market. If you saw the opposite quite frequently, then maybe you should stop reading the company propaganda and start reading the share holder info instead. How much bigger does the writing on the wall have to be for you people. And before everyone jumps on me again for bragging, I'm not. I am just trying to warn those looking at or working at XJT. XJT was a great airline until SkyWest screwed it up. |
ExpressJet
Originally Posted by Is offline
(Post 2262943)
Hahahahaha. Screwed it up by keeping them out of bankruptcy? How was that branded flying going?
Branded was abandoned in 2008. But it was the CPA Skywest negotiated with CAL in 2008 that made that flying unprofitable. So despite shuttering branded, XJT still lost money. And it's that same cpa that is still causing the unprofitableness on the ERJ side (the 2nd lowest clause Skywest negotiated with DAL for the ASA flying is the cause for that side). |
Originally Posted by Is offline
(Post 2262943)
Hahahahaha. Screwed it up by keeping them out of bankruptcy? How was that branded flying going?
|
No one knows what would have happened.. but one thing is for sure. There cards are stacked with the wrong aircraft..
|
Originally Posted by Is offline
(Post 2262943)
Hahahahaha. Screwed it up by keeping them out of bankruptcy? How was that branded flying going?
|
Originally Posted by AboveMins
(Post 2262973)
I'd have rather faced bankruptcy than this slow death by a thousand cuts. Branded was actually doing fine, and would have been profitable ahead of schedule.
|
Originally Posted by idlethrust
(Post 2262077)
Why is XJT getting rid of the 200's and Endeavor is planning on an Atlanta base with....Wait for it.............................Crj200's.
|
Originally Posted by FlightDirector
(Post 2262984)
The only place I hear about Endeavor opening a base in ATL is from XJT guys. Where are you getting this from? I've grilled the Endeavor guys and a number of them swear there is nothing in the pipeline for a base in ATL. I only ask because I live just outside of Atlanta and I'm in the process of filling out applications. I'd love to have an Atlanta Domacile but unfortunately XJT doesn't look like a viable option and all of Endeavor's other bases are horrible. I'm just tying to figure out if there is anyway to guess the chance of regional moving into ATL.
|
Originally Posted by Southern Fried
(Post 2262438)
From my perspective (15+ year captain) this is just more restructuring which is typical of Delta. I think the Delta side could see more dual class a/c. If you want to live in a Delta base as a regional pilot, plan on many changes in fleet count and base size.
As for the ERJ side, only the top level execs of Skywest/Expressjet know what the long range plan is. It will be reduced to around 100 a/c by the end of 2017, with expected further reductions in 2018. No current talk of dual class a/c for the ERJ side. Pretty gloomy picture for both sides to be honest. One other factor to consider: the Expressjet pilots will be entering negotiations for another try at a new contract in Oct 2017. Over the next year you will hear alot of doom and gloom and expectation management from our company leadership teams (Skywest and Expressjet). Every message from our leadership has some sort of expectation management in it. Don't expect much if any good news over the next year. |
So sad to see this place go down. I hate to say it but the guys with the doom and gloom were right all along. Sometimes the grumpy old timers have a point and guys are too stubborned to listen. Leaving and starting over is never easy but now it's almost like nobody has a choice.
RIP ASA. |
with all the regional hiring going on, I have maybe seen XJT advertise for hiring like once maybe twice. Just on that alone you can see that SkyWest is winding it down for whatever reason. Maybe it will be to staff their own airline later. on the United side, openly admitting to that side of business staying in the red is also particularly gloomy. I would imagine that by mid 2018, xjt will be no more, and that the united side of things will be flown by you as a consolidated member of SkyWest. So, if you're there at xjt, especially as an FO, do not settle for anymore regional flying. I hope you move on to bigger carriers. Settle not, you're scoped out on paying dues.
|
SKYW is up 7% today. That shows a lot about what xjt is/was doing to their earnings.
|
Originally Posted by Is offline
(Post 2262983)
The branded flying lost millions, and how long has it been since a profit was made? 2003..2004?
|
Originally Posted by Treehorn
(Post 2263297)
SKYW is up 7% today. That shows a lot about what xjt is/was doing to their earnings.
It also tells me the lift will go to Endeavor not SKW since that would have been in the announcement. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:49 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands