Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   ExpressJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/)
-   -   ExpressJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/98782-expressjet.html)

StrykerB21 01-15-2017 06:29 AM


Originally Posted by 701EV (Post 2280746)
Have you ever looked at Air Wisconsin?

Look at how many planes they have.

Look at their contract.

Air Wisconsin has been hanging around of many years with just CRJ-200's

AWAC wont make it through the summer.

TalkTurkey 01-16-2017 10:44 AM

Wow. Heard you all had a mishap in AMA yesterday. Best wishes.

blockplus 01-17-2017 05:53 PM

United annual report shows a drop of 19 e145s in 2017. Was this planned?

Arliss 01-17-2017 06:06 PM


Originally Posted by blockplus (Post 2283337)
United annual report shows a drop of 19 e145s in 2017. Was this planned?

Sounds about right.

amcnd 01-18-2017 02:52 AM


Originally Posted by blockplus (Post 2283337)
United annual report shows a drop of 19 e145s in 2017. Was this planned?

UA may drop 19. But how many does XJT drop?? 50??

Arliss 01-18-2017 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2283479)
UA may drop 19. But how many does XJT drop?? 50??

Sounds right. 2 planes a month lost to commutair plus parking 19 = 43 lost planes for 2017.

MoarAlpha 01-20-2017 09:33 AM

Is there a bonus being issued Feb 1st for contract signing?

N6279P 01-20-2017 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2283479)
UA may drop 19. But how many does XJT drop?? 50??

Trans States has been removing some of their old LR's from the United fleet also.

RemoveB4Flight 01-20-2017 10:42 AM


Originally Posted by 701EV (Post 2280746)
Have you ever looked at Air Wisconsin?

Look at how many planes they have.

Look at their contract.

Air Wisconsin has been hanging around of many years with just CRJ-200's

I hope you aren't using AWAC as an example of a surviving regional..

RemoveB4Flight 01-20-2017 10:46 AM


Originally Posted by BeechedJet (Post 2280868)
Remember, XJT and ASA two different airlines that happen to share a name. There's no combined fleet, seniority list, contract, etc. Parked ERJ's have no impact on L-ASA and parked CRJ's have no impact on L-XJT.

Are their financial futures not dependent on each other? Even without combined fleet, seniority list, contract, does the financial failure of one affect the other? I thought they were separate parts of the same company.

No Lies 01-20-2017 11:49 AM


Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight (Post 2285140)
Are their financial futures not dependent on each other? Even without combined fleet, seniority list, contract, does the financial failure of one affect the other? I thought they were separate parts of the same company.

Not anymore than Skywest and ExpressJet and ASA. Looks like Inc is making money.

Arliss 01-20-2017 06:28 PM


Originally Posted by MoarAlpha (Post 2285103)
Is there a bonus being issued Feb 1st for contract signing?

What contract?

wmupilot85 01-20-2017 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by Arliss (Post 2285381)
What contract?

For the contract extension. $1000 minimum profit sharing paid sometime in Feb. I'm hearing the 10th or the 24th, probably going to be on the off pay week.

BeechedJet 01-20-2017 07:33 PM

No matter what happens or where the profit is made, Inc. plays with their books and always shows any loss on the XJT side. Aaaaand no one ever gives a shiit.

RemoveB4Flight 01-20-2017 07:38 PM


Originally Posted by No Lies (Post 2285173)
Not anymore than Skywest and ExpressJet and ASA. Looks like Inc is making money.

They aren't making money off xjt/asa. They are only making money on the Skywest.

WesternSkies 01-20-2017 07:48 PM


Originally Posted by BeechedJet (Post 2285406)
No matter what happens or where the profit is made, Inc. plays with their books and always shows any loss on the XJT side. Aaaaand no one ever gives a shiit.

How do they do that?

jacburn 01-20-2017 08:01 PM


Originally Posted by WesternSkies (Post 2285412)
How do they do that?

Simple. You charge XJT for things like an IT dept, benefits dept, Maintenance fees. You get XJT to pay for hotel rooms and then when they get cancelled, Skywest gets the refund money into the Inc account. Ask any accountant how well the books can show something that is not true.

jacburn 01-20-2017 08:04 PM


Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight (Post 2285409)
They aren't making money off xjt/asa. They are only making money on the Skywest.

Skywest is in complete control of the contracts with the majors. They can move the money making contracts any where they want to put them. Skywest was also behind the XJT money losing contracts.

Jvw700 01-20-2017 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by jacburn (Post 2285419)
Skywest is in complete control of the contracts with the majors. They can move the money making contracts any where they want to put them. Skywest was also behind the XJT money losing contracts.

You guys have special access to Skywest INCs "books"? Kinda funny reading ya'lls posts and how much you think you know. One thing is for certain though, Skywest should have never acquired express jet!

gojo 01-20-2017 08:23 PM


Originally Posted by Jvw700 (Post 2285422)
You guys have special access to Skywest INCs "books"? Kinda funny reading ya'lls posts and how much you think you know. One thing is for certain though, Skywest should have never acquired express jet!

Man, talk about a coolaid drinker. Skywest has been brilliant with the non union side. Are you saying they're not smart enough to make Express Jet profitable? They're doing exactly what they want with Express Jet.

WesternSkies 01-20-2017 08:51 PM

They wanted to spend money to lose money because expressjet had unionized pilots?

I can't believe your airline still has an IT department though. That is shady.

amcnd 01-20-2017 09:10 PM

No ones cooking books.. They even said they made a huge "miscalculation" on the contract when they bought XJT. The guy behind that was sent out the door... now the mop up continues. Plan and simple.

BeechedJet 01-20-2017 10:20 PM

This is just my opinion but I really think if Inc. was so concerned about getting the costs of the XJT under control, they would have done something about in the last three years other than let us sit on our hands while the lights are turned off one by one. Every other regional in that time frame has seemed to blossom into something great but XJT, nah, unsalvagable, shut it down boys, problem solving is hard.

gojo 01-21-2017 04:18 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2285432)
No ones cooking books.. They even said they made a huge "miscalculation" on the contract when they bought XJT. The guy behind that was sent out the door... now the mop up continues. Plan and simple.

And what did you think they'd say? Um, we bought Express Jet to gain a big chunk of the market share. That's all. How long did it take them to put that deal together to buy Express Jet anyways? IIRC, I think that it was quite a while. I seriously doubt they did that without doing their research.

amcnd 01-21-2017 04:37 AM


Originally Posted by gojo (Post 2285477)
And what did you think they'd say? Um, we bought Express Jet to gain a big chunk of the market share. That's all. How long did it take them to put that deal together to buy Express Jet anyways? IIRC, I think that it was quite a while. I seriously doubt they did that without doing their research.

Go back and listen to all the conference calls. It gets spit out more then once.. It came down to they signed a deal based on SkyWest costs but never could make that happen do to multiple reasons.. at first i thought they didn't want the E145. But now they dont even want ASA 200's..

BeechedJet 01-21-2017 07:37 AM

Actually they're replacing some of the high time OO 200's with EV birds. Go figure.

Nevjets 01-21-2017 12:49 PM

They could have made it all work but the anti-union is too strong. The XJT and ASA MEC were all for negotiating something for all three pilot groups that was beneficial to all sides. Instead they decided to do it their way thinking they could get the XJT and ASA pilot group go for their concessions. And they might still succeed. But in the meantime they have squandered hundreds of thousands of dollars and thousands of jobs.

checklist 01-21-2017 02:22 PM

Where would one find those conference calls? On xjt.com?

4myfamily 01-21-2017 07:58 PM


Originally Posted by BeechedJet (Post 2285556)
Actually they're replacing some of the high time OO 200's with EV birds. Go figure.

I thought OO announced they are parking all 200s this year. Why would they take EVs?

gojo 01-21-2017 08:01 PM


Originally Posted by 4myfamily (Post 2285962)
I thought OO announced they are parking all 200s this year. Why would they take EVs?

Really, what planet are you on? OO didn't announce parking all 200's. OO said that they were getting rid of the 200 fleet at Express Jet

No Lies 01-21-2017 08:18 PM


Originally Posted by gojo (Post 2285963)
Really, what planet are you on? OO didn't announce parking all 200's. OO said that they were getting rid of the 200 fleet at Express Jet

Can you post the memo that said it was only the L-ASA 200's and not the Skywest 200's that were being parked?

amcnd 01-22-2017 05:09 AM


Originally Posted by No Lies (Post 2285966)
Can you post the memo that said it was only the L-ASA 200's and not the Skywest 200's that were being parked?

The SKW inter memo. Basically the press release states ASA to loss all 200 flying and gaining 700's for AA (12'ish). And on the SKW side they said they will loss a few to "old age", but no significant drop of 200's. SkyWest is even back flying 700's for Alaska!!

gojo 01-22-2017 05:51 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2286042)
The SKW inter memo. Basically the press release states ASA to loss all 200 flying and gaining 700's for AA (12'ish). And on the SKW side they said they will loss a few to "old age", but no significant drop of 200's. SkyWest is even back flying 700's for Alaska!!

In addition, using the word "parked" to quote No Lies is a misnomer. While a significant number are being parked many are going to SkyWest and Endeavor.

AMNegron 01-22-2017 05:53 AM

ExpressJet
 
Agreed. Saw three EV tails in ORD yesterday. One of them in SKW livery.

RemoveB4Flight 01-22-2017 06:22 AM

I don't see why anyone is surprised that some xjt aircraft will be at OO. If Inc wants to get rid of 200s from xjt where would you expect them to go with the 200s? It would make sense to replace some older ones from OO and park the older ones instead.

WesternSkies 01-22-2017 06:25 AM

Skyw has been flying EV tails for years.

gojo 01-22-2017 06:42 AM


Originally Posted by WesternSkies (Post 2286069)
Skyw has been flying EV tails for years.

And Comair, Mesaba, Pinnacle, Horizon, etc.

amcnd 01-22-2017 07:08 AM


Originally Posted by gojo (Post 2286075)
And Comair, Mesaba, Pinnacle, Horizon, etc.

You forgot Independence air and Air Mekong...

Nevjets 01-22-2017 03:11 PM


Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight (Post 2286067)
I don't see why anyone is surprised that some xjt aircraft will be at OO. If Inc wants to get rid of 200s from xjt where would you expect them to go with the 200s? It would make sense to replace some older ones from OO and park the older ones instead.



Nope, not surprised they are "transferring" the aircraft. But that wasn't the point. The point is that if they were going to operated anyway, why do they have to leave ASA?

HighFlight 01-22-2017 04:32 PM

SKW had a press release recently. Something like 76 total 200s to be given up, I think it was 49 from XJT. You can go back a few pages (maybe a month?) in the SKW thread and find the public link to the article. EDV seems to be getting 14 of them in 2017.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands