![]() |
Originally Posted by 701EV
(Post 2280746)
Have you ever looked at Air Wisconsin?
Look at how many planes they have. Look at their contract. Air Wisconsin has been hanging around of many years with just CRJ-200's |
Wow. Heard you all had a mishap in AMA yesterday. Best wishes.
|
United annual report shows a drop of 19 e145s in 2017. Was this planned?
|
Originally Posted by blockplus
(Post 2283337)
United annual report shows a drop of 19 e145s in 2017. Was this planned?
|
Originally Posted by blockplus
(Post 2283337)
United annual report shows a drop of 19 e145s in 2017. Was this planned?
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2283479)
UA may drop 19. But how many does XJT drop?? 50??
|
Is there a bonus being issued Feb 1st for contract signing?
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2283479)
UA may drop 19. But how many does XJT drop?? 50??
|
Originally Posted by 701EV
(Post 2280746)
Have you ever looked at Air Wisconsin?
Look at how many planes they have. Look at their contract. Air Wisconsin has been hanging around of many years with just CRJ-200's |
Originally Posted by BeechedJet
(Post 2280868)
Remember, XJT and ASA two different airlines that happen to share a name. There's no combined fleet, seniority list, contract, etc. Parked ERJ's have no impact on L-ASA and parked CRJ's have no impact on L-XJT.
|
Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
(Post 2285140)
Are their financial futures not dependent on each other? Even without combined fleet, seniority list, contract, does the financial failure of one affect the other? I thought they were separate parts of the same company.
|
Originally Posted by MoarAlpha
(Post 2285103)
Is there a bonus being issued Feb 1st for contract signing?
|
Originally Posted by Arliss
(Post 2285381)
What contract?
|
No matter what happens or where the profit is made, Inc. plays with their books and always shows any loss on the XJT side. Aaaaand no one ever gives a shiit.
|
Originally Posted by No Lies
(Post 2285173)
Not anymore than Skywest and ExpressJet and ASA. Looks like Inc is making money.
|
Originally Posted by BeechedJet
(Post 2285406)
No matter what happens or where the profit is made, Inc. plays with their books and always shows any loss on the XJT side. Aaaaand no one ever gives a shiit.
|
Originally Posted by WesternSkies
(Post 2285412)
How do they do that?
|
Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
(Post 2285409)
They aren't making money off xjt/asa. They are only making money on the Skywest.
|
Originally Posted by jacburn
(Post 2285419)
Skywest is in complete control of the contracts with the majors. They can move the money making contracts any where they want to put them. Skywest was also behind the XJT money losing contracts.
|
Originally Posted by Jvw700
(Post 2285422)
You guys have special access to Skywest INCs "books"? Kinda funny reading ya'lls posts and how much you think you know. One thing is for certain though, Skywest should have never acquired express jet!
|
They wanted to spend money to lose money because expressjet had unionized pilots?
I can't believe your airline still has an IT department though. That is shady. |
No ones cooking books.. They even said they made a huge "miscalculation" on the contract when they bought XJT. The guy behind that was sent out the door... now the mop up continues. Plan and simple.
|
This is just my opinion but I really think if Inc. was so concerned about getting the costs of the XJT under control, they would have done something about in the last three years other than let us sit on our hands while the lights are turned off one by one. Every other regional in that time frame has seemed to blossom into something great but XJT, nah, unsalvagable, shut it down boys, problem solving is hard.
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2285432)
No ones cooking books.. They even said they made a huge "miscalculation" on the contract when they bought XJT. The guy behind that was sent out the door... now the mop up continues. Plan and simple.
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 2285477)
And what did you think they'd say? Um, we bought Express Jet to gain a big chunk of the market share. That's all. How long did it take them to put that deal together to buy Express Jet anyways? IIRC, I think that it was quite a while. I seriously doubt they did that without doing their research.
|
Actually they're replacing some of the high time OO 200's with EV birds. Go figure.
|
They could have made it all work but the anti-union is too strong. The XJT and ASA MEC were all for negotiating something for all three pilot groups that was beneficial to all sides. Instead they decided to do it their way thinking they could get the XJT and ASA pilot group go for their concessions. And they might still succeed. But in the meantime they have squandered hundreds of thousands of dollars and thousands of jobs.
|
Where would one find those conference calls? On xjt.com?
|
Originally Posted by BeechedJet
(Post 2285556)
Actually they're replacing some of the high time OO 200's with EV birds. Go figure.
|
Originally Posted by 4myfamily
(Post 2285962)
I thought OO announced they are parking all 200s this year. Why would they take EVs?
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 2285963)
Really, what planet are you on? OO didn't announce parking all 200's. OO said that they were getting rid of the 200 fleet at Express Jet
|
Originally Posted by No Lies
(Post 2285966)
Can you post the memo that said it was only the L-ASA 200's and not the Skywest 200's that were being parked?
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2286042)
The SKW inter memo. Basically the press release states ASA to loss all 200 flying and gaining 700's for AA (12'ish). And on the SKW side they said they will loss a few to "old age", but no significant drop of 200's. SkyWest is even back flying 700's for Alaska!!
|
ExpressJet
Agreed. Saw three EV tails in ORD yesterday. One of them in SKW livery.
|
I don't see why anyone is surprised that some xjt aircraft will be at OO. If Inc wants to get rid of 200s from xjt where would you expect them to go with the 200s? It would make sense to replace some older ones from OO and park the older ones instead.
|
Skyw has been flying EV tails for years.
|
Originally Posted by WesternSkies
(Post 2286069)
Skyw has been flying EV tails for years.
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 2286075)
And Comair, Mesaba, Pinnacle, Horizon, etc.
|
Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
(Post 2286067)
I don't see why anyone is surprised that some xjt aircraft will be at OO. If Inc wants to get rid of 200s from xjt where would you expect them to go with the 200s? It would make sense to replace some older ones from OO and park the older ones instead.
Nope, not surprised they are "transferring" the aircraft. But that wasn't the point. The point is that if they were going to operated anyway, why do they have to leave ASA? |
SKW had a press release recently. Something like 76 total 200s to be given up, I think it was 49 from XJT. You can go back a few pages (maybe a month?) in the SKW thread and find the public link to the article. EDV seems to be getting 14 of them in 2017.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands