![]() |
Originally Posted by GuppyNG
(Post 2265268)
All parked in 2017? Quit telling lies.
|
Originally Posted by No Lies
(Post 2265146)
1. All
2. ? 3. All parked in 2017. 2. The reason I ask is I wonder if they're going to the desert or another airline. 3. Right, all in 2017, but is there a list of aircraft somewhere with the date they each die? |
Originally Posted by GuppyNG
(Post 2265268)
All parked in 2017? Quit telling lies.
|
According to the press release SKW put out, 46 from ASA.
Originally Posted by Dingus
(Post 2265273)
1. Right, how many is all? 37?
|
Originally Posted by No Lies
(Post 2265260)
You do know that your credibility went out the window just a little over a month ago when you stated Skywest never said they were parking 50 seat aircraft.
|
Originally Posted by Hou757
(Post 2265359)
Since you like to change the subject, you never showed me where they said that prior to this announcement.
|
Originally Posted by No Lies
(Post 2265397)
Yep, that's changing the subject. I am not going to waste my time, if you are not going to waste your time. Where are those letters that said the opposite? Mine are inside the Q reports a couple of years back. I am just too lazy to look for them. It all depends when you show me the letters that you have that say "stated the opposite quite frequently".
|
Originally Posted by HighFlight
(Post 2265338)
According to the press release SKW put out, 46 from ASA.
|
Originally Posted by wmupilot85
(Post 2265427)
49 total, but 12 are being replaced with dual class RJ's. So a total reduction of 37. 1 is also sticking around for at risk flying in DFW, which I don't believe is counted in that 49 total count. I'm not sure what will happen with the one that's painted in ExpressJet colors either. That may become the at risk airplane.
|
Originally Posted by Hou757
(Post 2265140)
For those worrying about furloughs (which I understand) take a look at how many planes we have parked on the ERJ side and have not had to furlough one pilot. With attrition I would assume no furloughs on the ASA side.
|
So what do we do now? I would rather go work at Hooters than go too an outfit like Mesa or one of the Hulas torture chambers. I here 37 planes gone on here but other people are saying over 100.
|
Originally Posted by Flysafeeveryone
(Post 2269574)
So what do we do now? I would rather go work at Hooters than go too an outfit like Mesa or one of the Hulas torture chambers. I here 37 planes gone on here but other people are saying over 100.
|
Not that this is new news, but I was talking to someone who has a "friend" under a NDA in ATL HQ and they solidified the fact that this place is done in 2017. Fleet size will start dropping dramatically in 2017 as it is currently scheduled to. Towards the end they're going to offer us the Skywest contract. If we don't take it then donezo. I say, hello unemployment line. Very reliable source on that.
|
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2269599)
Not that this is new news, but I was talking to someone who has a "friend" under a NDA in ATL HQ and they solidified the fact that this place is done in 2017. Fleet size will start dropping dramatically in 2017 as it is currently scheduled to. Towards the end they're going to offer us the Skywest contract. If we don't take it then donezo. I say, hello unemployment line. Very reliable source on that.
|
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2269599)
Not that this is new news, but I was talking to someone who has a "friend" under a NDA in ATL HQ and they solidified the fact that this place is done in 2017. Fleet size will start dropping dramatically in 2017 as it is currently scheduled to. Towards the end they're going to offer us the Skywest contract. If we don't take it then donezo. I say, hello unemployment line. Very reliable source on that.
|
Originally Posted by Dingus
(Post 2269590)
Just curious, do you meet the "eligibility" requirements to work at Hooters? :D
For your information, when they turned me down at Chippendales, they told me they thought I would be perfect for Hooters. |
Originally Posted by wmupilot85
(Post 2270007)
You should clarify...ERJ, CRJ, or both? Sounds like ERJ side only.
|
Originally Posted by ThreeStripe
(Post 2269545)
If they do decide to furlough, it will only exacerbate the pilot shortage. How many of us will not/can not start over? Perfectly good pilots will exit the industry if they can't get picked up by a major before getting the ax.
|
Originally Posted by Flysafeeveryone
(Post 2270009)
Go ahead, make fun of a guy's dreams!
For your information, when they turned me down at Chippendales, they told me they thought I would be perfect for Hooters. |
Originally Posted by idlethrust
(Post 2270074)
Perfect for hooters? What size bra you you wear?? Has to be Double D or better ha,ha ha
Yours sincerely, PC police |
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2270018)
Scary thing is my source said both. CRJ side to shut 6 months after ERJ side.
|
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2269599)
Not that this is new news, but I was talking to someone who has a "friend" under a NDA in ATL HQ and they solidified the fact that this place is done in 2017. Fleet size will start dropping dramatically in 2017 as it is currently scheduled to. Towards the end they're going to offer us the Skywest contract. If we don't take it then donezo. I say, hello unemployment line. Very reliable source on that.
Calling BS on this. The 200s are going away, but why would OO take on AA flying if we're closing the doors? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by bhmdiversion
(Post 2270255)
Calling BS on this. The 200s are going away, but why would OO take on AA flying if we're closing the doors?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
And the lift will be done by whom?
|
Originally Posted by Beast
(Post 2270324)
And the lift will be done by whom?
GoJet (DAL) Skywest (DAL, AA) Republic (DAL, AA) Compass (DAL, AA) TSA (AA) Air Wisconsin (AA) PSA (AA) Piedmont (AA) Envoy (AA) |
I've read all the comments concerning ExpressJet...does anyone think the company will be viable past 1/1/19? I heard yesterday the CPA with United was extended indefinitely as long as ExpressJet continues to operate. The projections seem to indicate that the ERJ side will continue to shrink until 101 airframes are reached, but with all of the ERJs on the United side, even that seems like a lot of 50 seaters...
|
Originally Posted by armyflyer11
(Post 2275276)
I've read all the comments concerning ExpressJet...does anyone think the company will be viable past 1/1/19? I heard yesterday the CPA with United was extended indefinitely as long as ExpressJet continues to operate. The projections seem to indicate that the ERJ side will continue to shrink until 101 airframes are reached, but with all of the ERJs on the United side, even that seems like a lot of 50 seaters...
|
Honest question. Why wait it out? Are there lots of benefits on spiraling to oblivion versus leaving now in droves? Honest
|
I don't work there, I was asking as a prospective employee...things don't seem to be getting better, though, no doubt. Apparently, L-ASA union reps put out to start looking for work based off what someone else said on another thread. Still, the airline seems like it has a lot of great people, great performance, and excellent training.
|
Sinking ship, get out, get out now.
AnchorDown |
at the risk of stating the obvious, isn't this just a case of a non-unionized carrier, SkyWest, killing the unionized side (ExpressJet) to pick off the lift from the carcass?
|
Originally Posted by MidLife
(Post 2280590)
at the risk of stating the obvious, isn't this just a case of a non-unionized carrier, SkyWest, killing the unionized side (ExpressJet) to pick off the lift from the carcass?
|
Originally Posted by armyflyer11
(Post 2276688)
I don't work there, I was asking as a prospective employee...things don't seem to be getting better, though, no doubt. Apparently, L-ASA union reps put out to start looking for work based off what someone else said on another thread. Still, the airline seems like it has a lot of great people, great performance, and excellent training.
I'd definitely go elsewhere. I sure can't think of any regional ever surviving after parking half it's fleet. (You are right, there are a lot of great people, training is good etc. Doesn't change the likelihood that Skywest is gonna gut the place.) |
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2280740)
I'd definitely go elsewhere.
I sure can't think of any regional ever surviving after parking half it's fleet. (You are right, there are a lot of great people, training is good etc. Doesn't change the likelihood that Skywest is gonna gut the place.) Have you ever looked at Air Wisconsin? Look at how many planes they have. Look at their contract. Air Wisconsin has been hanging around of many years with just CRJ-200's |
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2280740)
I'd definitely go elsewhere.
I sure can't think of any regional ever surviving after parking half it's fleet. (You are right, there are a lot of great people, training is good etc. Doesn't change the likelihood that Skywest is gonna gut the place.) |
Originally Posted by 701EV
(Post 2280746)
Have you ever looked at Air Wisconsin?
Look at how many planes they have. Look at their contract. Air Wisconsin has been hanging around of many years with just CRJ-200's |
39 airframes taken away from 282... don't think that's quite half.
(Using the airframe total here on APC; not sure if it's accurate)
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2280740)
I sure can't think of any regional ever surviving after parking half it's fleet.
|
Originally Posted by HighFlight
(Post 2280837)
39 airframes taken away from 282... don't think that's quite half.
(Using the airframe total here on APC; not sure if it's accurate) |
Remember, XJT and ASA two different airlines that happen to share a name. There's no combined fleet, seniority list, contract, etc. Parked ERJ's have no impact on L-ASA and parked CRJ's have no impact on L-XJT.
|
Originally Posted by HighFlight
(Post 2280837)
39 airframes taken away from 282... don't think that's quite half.
(Using the airframe total here on APC; not sure if it's accurate) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands