Search
Notices

737s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2017, 07:34 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Does anyone know how a 737-800 (isn't that the biggest one these days?) "cubes out" compared to a 757?

MaydayMark is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 07:41 AM
  #22  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark View Post
Does anyone know how a 737-800 (isn't that the biggest one these days?) "cubes out" compared to a 757?
Both the 737-800BCF and AEI conversion holds 11 standard AAY/A2N containers on the main deck, along with a single AKE/LD3 all the way aft.

There currently is no UberGuppy (ie. 737-900) freighter.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 08:35 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyBoyd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: FDX 767 FO
Posts: 817
Default

Boeing: Freighters
FlyBoyd is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 03:33 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
deHavilland's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 27
Default

So.. the -800 freighter, according to manufacturer's numbers (which are never optimistic, right?) can haul a 50k payload about halfway across the country, if you don't have an alternate and the winds aren't worse than they are historically (85% of the time).

Boeing: Freighters

Look at the bright side, you won't be doing any sweep flights..
deHavilland is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 04:39 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OKLATEX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by BlackKnight View Post
Had a mngmnt type on the airplane recently- confirmed the rumor of the 73. The 75's are already super old and maintenance intensive. There was talk of the Airbus also, including the A330. But I thought the idea was to go all Boeing 2 engine for ease of fleet commonality and maintenance (my inference only)? The 76 continues to not be able to carry what the MD fleet can- thus It was said the MD will be not be going anywhere soon.
I've heard the A330 Rumor too. Seems to be about the only thing available that could replace an MD-11.

I've never heard the company say anything about going all Boeing. I have heard they want to be an airline that just has twin engine airplanes. I've heard the A300s will be around for another Decade and I think the MD-11s will be too. Also, everyone seems to think the 767s are to replace MD-11s. Company has never said that, as far I'm aware of. Thave always said they are a MD-10 replacement. (Other statements from the Company mention they are to replace the A310 as well). I would agree that the 767 isn't a MD-10-30 replacement either. I think the -30s will stick around too for awhile.


End of an Era as FedEx Express Retires Last B727

June 21, 2013
Boeing-FedEx-727-1.jpg newsroom
MEMPHIS, Tenn., June 21, 2013 — For 35 years, Boeing 727 aircraft were a reliable workhorse for the world’s largest express transportation company. Today, the venerable 727 narrow-body freighter closes an enduring chapter in aviation history as FedEx becomes the last major carrier to retire the aircraft from service. The retirement is part of the company’s aircraft modernization strategy.

The 727’s domestic mission will conclude at 1:30 p.m. CDT as FedEx aircraft N481FE touches down at the FedEx Express World Hub at Memphis International Airport. Greeting its arrival will be more than 1,000 company executives, air operations team members and other guests who will mark the airplane’s historic last flight with a special ceremony.

A departure ceremony at the FedEx hub in Indianapolis, which has served as the company’s primary base for 727 general maintenance checks, begins the historic farewell flight.

“For more than three decades, our Boeing 727 fleet was instrumental in our company’s domestic growth,” said David J. Bronczek, president and chief executive officer, FedEx Express. “Today, we are opening a new chapter for company growth and opportunity as we continue to modernize our global fleet with more technologically advanced, fuel efficient, lower emission cargo jets.”

History of the 727 at FedEx

Introduction of this larger, mid-size jet freighter to the FedEx fleet was made possible by deregulation of the airline industry in 1977, giving the upstart express carrier access to more domestic markets and bringing immediate operational efficiencies because of greater payload capabilities. FedEx operated only small Dassault Falcons before the industry was deregulated. An exemption then allowed a company to enter the common carrier business if its payloads were less than 7,500 pounds.

It was Jan. 14, 1978 when then-Federal Express took delivery in Memphis of its first 727 aircraft, which was purchased from a passenger airline. On that day, Frederick W. Smith, chairman, president and chief executive officer, FedEx Corp., told several hundred employees and guests at the delivery event, “Many people look at this airplane and believe that Federal Express has arrived at the end of a long road. This is not the end of anything. It is simply the beginning.”

Early FedEx acquisitions of used 727s from other carriers were followed by new aircraft purchases from Boeing, with the last 727 leaving the manufacturer’s assembly line and being delivered to FedEx in 1984. The express carrier at one point was the world’s largest operator of 727s, with 170 of the aircraft in its fleet at any one time.

Modernization of the FedEx Fleet

FedEx began retiring its 727-200 fleet in 2007 and replacing them with more modern Boeing 757 airplanes. The retirement cycle accelerated under the fleet modernization program that through the last several years included more 757 freighters, as well as new Boeing 777 long-range freighters, which are the biggest in the FedEx fleet and the world’s largest twin-engine cargo aircraft. This fall, FedEx begins taking delivery of new Boeing 767 aircraft to replace its aging MD-10 freighters.

As with the other aircraft types being introduced, the 767s will provide significantly improved reliability and are substantially more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly than the aircraft they will replace. FedEx is committed to reducing its aircraft carbon emissions 30 percent by the year 2020 under its fleet modernization program. It expects to source at least 30 percent of its jet fuel from alternative fuels by the year 2030.

“As we celebrate our company’s 40th anniversary, we can look back at an aircraft bloodline that has been impressive,” Bronczek said. “From the small Falcons, which served us well when the company was young, to our 727s, to what is now the largest fleet of express cargo aircraft in the world, our transportation capabilities for global customers is unmatched in the industry. Equally impressive are the innovation, technology and environmental benefits of the new aircraft we are adding.”

Continuation of Service

Not only are FedEx 727s being retired, but nearly half of the fleet has been donated coast-to-coast to aviation schools, colleges and local communities in the last several years.

From Anchorage to Austin, from Billings to Buffalo, from Sioux City to Shreveport and many points between, FedEx aircraft donations support school curriculums that are developing the next generation of aviation professionals. The donated aircraft are also being used for training by emergency response teams at local airports and fire departments.

For FedEx pilots like Capt. Chip Groner, who piloted a 727 for about 10 years, closing the door on 727 operations is a turning point not only for FedEx but for the aviation industry.

“The 727 was a mainstay aircraft and one of the most dependable we ever had in our fleet. More importantly, it was the plane that really put FedEx on the map as an overnight express carrier,” the 35-year FedEx crew member said. “It’s the end of an era, but it’s only natural because of changing technology that improves the fuel and operational efficiencies of today’s new aircraft. The 727, for many pilots, will always be the airplane that really brought the airline industry into the jet age.”
OKLATEX is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 04:04 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

The 75s are Mx intensive?

That's not been my experience. Fewer MELs and Fewer Calls to MX for issues prior to departure than during my tenure on previous airplanes.

Do think they're a Mx pain because there are so many variants and parts specific to a particular series of 75s, but they've been very reliable during my 5 years on the Baby Boeing
kronan is offline  
Old 04-27-2017, 12:17 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

So basically they can either order some number of A330's, or roughly .5 x the number of MD10's of either 737's or A320's and have roughly the same capacity overall.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 04-27-2017, 12:57 PM
  #28  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

The A330F doesn't hold that much more volume than a 767-300F.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 04-27-2017, 01:30 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
The A330F doesn't hold that much more volume than a 767-300F.


I'm not gonna embarrass myself with a protractor and ruler, but the current A330F is 12ft longer than a 767-300 and has the same wider fuselage as the A300. That's some level of additional volume. My understanding from ramp types is that the typical payload difference comes down to 20-40,000 pounds worth depending on the MD10 type. Also, one of those infamous little birdie types said that we'd also be interested in an A330-300 freighter be that a conversion or a new build deal. That plane is considerably bigger than the 767-300.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 04-27-2017, 02:26 PM
  #30  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

The A330F holds 22 AMJ/M1N (96x125x96) containers, or 20 AAD/A1 (88x125x96) containers and 3 AMJ/M1Ns; it also has 8 belly positions.

The 767-300F holds 24 AAD/A1 containers and has 7 belly positions.

Main deck volume is a wash, though the extra belly container of the A330 gives it an edge in total volume. The A330F also has better range/payload flexibility.

An A330-300F would allow 26 AMJ/A1N, getting it close to a MD11 in total volume...but with nowhere near the range.
BoilerUP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aa73
United
20
08-31-2015 08:01 PM
APC225
United
120
09-04-2013 03:08 PM
ryane946
Major
21
03-18-2012 01:27 PM
shfo
Major
5
04-14-2009 04:50 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
3
03-25-2008 06:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices