MEC only retirement Vote?? from Block Rep
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 936
It’s amazing to see the guys who voted for the last contract now complaining about the retirement. You guys should not have vote for a contract without a fix to the retirement. That should have been the line in the sand. You guys got what you voted for and unfortunately 43% of the crew is paying the price for the shortsightedness of 57%
#92
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
You are absolutely right 100% of the crew force will pay the price. Tony I know you’re smarter than to ask which department do I work? Why would I be so concerned about FedEx contract? The Union is as weak as they get and the crew force is as divided as they get.
#94
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
You seems to be obsessed with my mom, however she is out of your league. Stick to what you think you have at home.
#95
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
How is voicing my opinion annoying? You think I’m annoying because you made the assumption that I wasn’t a FedEx pilot so I should not comment on issues pertaining to FedEx crew force. But it’s obvious you know what happens when you assume.
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 936
I think they have a 1% of high 5 X YOS max 30. That is what the PBGC is concerned with. They supplement with a buy up to get them close to parity with us. The buy up has an expiration date a couple of years after the contract becomes amendable, so it has to be renegotiated every contract. But since it expires no big PBGC penalty. Presumably cheaper than increasing the A Plan cap thus easier to make improvements every contract. When you heard all of the no voters huffing and puffing about how UPS got an A Plan improvement and we didn't, this is what they were talking about.
How it could work for us, A Plan stays the same but every pilot on the property gets an additional 100 a month x YOS in addition to the A Plan. This would be a separate account that would avoid the PBGC.
How it could work for us, A Plan stays the same but every pilot on the property gets an additional 100 a month x YOS in addition to the A Plan. This would be a separate account that would avoid the PBGC.
#99
UPS Retirement
401K Matching: No
A/B Fund:
A Plan: 1% FAE or Flat dollar $4000 times YOS (Max 30 years) equals $120,000/year pension. Flat dollar amount increases to $4200 on 1/1/21
B Plan: 12%
Note: It’s the TOTAL retirement that matters. A fund + B fund
Our A max benefit ($130K) is currently better than their A max benefit ($120K). Their’s will be $126K on Jan 1, 2021. Inching closer to ours, but admittedly taking longer to earn (30 years vs 25 years)
However, their B Fund is 12% compared to our 8% now (9% in 2 years)
We could improve our TOTAL retirement by improving either or A or B fund (...or both)
The union isn’t looking at B fund improvements at all
Why??
A hybrid, diversified plan, which has both a gaurunteed portion and a pilot controlled, at risk portion, seems best
We don’t need to move to a model where both the A fund and B fund are at financial risk to the pilots - especially when that A fund risk wouldn’t be individually controlled.
401K Matching: No
A/B Fund:
A Plan: 1% FAE or Flat dollar $4000 times YOS (Max 30 years) equals $120,000/year pension. Flat dollar amount increases to $4200 on 1/1/21
B Plan: 12%
Note: It’s the TOTAL retirement that matters. A fund + B fund
Our A max benefit ($130K) is currently better than their A max benefit ($120K). Their’s will be $126K on Jan 1, 2021. Inching closer to ours, but admittedly taking longer to earn (30 years vs 25 years)
However, their B Fund is 12% compared to our 8% now (9% in 2 years)
We could improve our TOTAL retirement by improving either or A or B fund (...or both)
The union isn’t looking at B fund improvements at all
Why??
A hybrid, diversified plan, which has both a gaurunteed portion and a pilot controlled, at risk portion, seems best
We don’t need to move to a model where both the A fund and B fund are at financial risk to the pilots - especially when that A fund risk wouldn’t be individually controlled.
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 936
UPS Retirement
401K Matching: No
A/B Fund:
A Plan: 1% FAE or Flat dollar $4000 times YOS (Max 30 years) equals $120,000/year pension. Flat dollar amount increases to $4200 on 1/1/21
B Plan: 12%
Note: It’s the TOTAL retirement that matters. A fund + B fund
Our A max benefit ($130K) is currently better than their A max benefit ($120K). Their’s will be $126K on Jan 1, 2021. Inching closer to ours, but admittedly taking longer to earn (30 years vs 25 years)
However, their B Fund is 12% compared to our 8% now (9% in 2 years)
We could improve our TOTAL retirement by improving either or A or B fund (...or both)
The union isn’t looking at B fund improvements at all
Why??
401K Matching: No
A/B Fund:
A Plan: 1% FAE or Flat dollar $4000 times YOS (Max 30 years) equals $120,000/year pension. Flat dollar amount increases to $4200 on 1/1/21
B Plan: 12%
Note: It’s the TOTAL retirement that matters. A fund + B fund
Our A max benefit ($130K) is currently better than their A max benefit ($120K). Their’s will be $126K on Jan 1, 2021. Inching closer to ours, but admittedly taking longer to earn (30 years vs 25 years)
However, their B Fund is 12% compared to our 8% now (9% in 2 years)
We could improve our TOTAL retirement by improving either or A or B fund (...or both)
The union isn’t looking at B fund improvements at all
Why??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post