At least we don't have PBS! Oh wait, we do.
#11
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 56
AD OPT | Airline Crew Planning Optimization
Ad-opt, a division of Kronos, provides PBS software for 20 airlines, including us. There really isn’t a discussion on whether we have PBS in the Secondary Line system or not, we do.
Ad-opt, a division of Kronos, provides PBS software for 20 airlines, including us. There really isn’t a discussion on whether we have PBS in the Secondary Line system or not, we do.
#12
I'd love to see an awesome, transparent, easy to use and understand bidding program for our secondary lines that honors seniority and produces quality schedules. If the company or we call it "PBS" I really don't give a rat's ass.
The problem isn't how we create our secondary lines (anything would be better than what we've used for the last 20 years). It's the fact that the "known R-day" language in CBA 2015 has allowed a large increase in secondary lines across all fleets. That is a much bigger problem than worrying about whether we call our secondary line process "PBS" or not.
#13
So what? Any airline that still uses published line bidding has some kind of method of receiving inputs for and building secondary lines with conflicted trips (i.e PBS). We've been doing it that way at FedEx for a very long time.
I'd love to see an awesome, transparent, easy to use and understand bidding program for our secondary lines that honors seniority and produces quality schedules. If the company or we call it "PBS" I really don't give a rat's ass.
The problem isn't how we create our secondary lines (anything would be better than what we've used for the last 20 years). It's the fact that the "known R-day" language in CBA 2015 has allowed a large increase in secondary lines across all fleets. That is a much bigger problem than worrying about whether we call our secondary line process "PBS" or not.
I'd love to see an awesome, transparent, easy to use and understand bidding program for our secondary lines that honors seniority and produces quality schedules. If the company or we call it "PBS" I really don't give a rat's ass.
The problem isn't how we create our secondary lines (anything would be better than what we've used for the last 20 years). It's the fact that the "known R-day" language in CBA 2015 has allowed a large increase in secondary lines across all fleets. That is a much bigger problem than worrying about whether we call our secondary line process "PBS" or not.
Yes, that is precisely the problem. WE have no control on how the company builds secondary lines. Which is why we should have designed our own system with our own parameters.
Again, the secondary process didn't have to be this bad. We let them do it to us. They got the software they wanted with the parameters they wanted.
Rumor: I've heard the SLG software IS NOT the software that we negotiated for with C2015. Rumor is this is the software they had already developed and had always wanted.
Question: has the MEC Chairman signed off on the new SLG software as proposed in C2015?
#15
The 75 bid pack is now 37.7% PBS for Captains and 33.7% PBS for FOs.
We have been snookered by the company and we better pull our heads out of our a$$es before they do it again with our retirement.
We have been snookered by the company and we better pull our heads out of our a$$es before they do it again with our retirement.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
Absolutely!! Work rules are everything.... This is becoming worse and won't stop till we stop it
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post