Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Retirement Plan Negotiations? >

Retirement Plan Negotiations?

Search
Notices

Retirement Plan Negotiations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2019, 05:44 AM
  #191  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,355
Default

Did this go away or is it still a thing?
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 05:56 AM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,377
Default

Most of the crew force wishes it would go away.

The MEC needs to justify spending a million dollars of our dues money with negotiations just down the road.

This is a money grab by the "over 25 and high 5, I've got mine" crowd, and the rest of us are getting ready to get screwed.

Increase the B fund, substantially, make it cash over cap, and leave the A fund alone, or increase it if we can.

All the rest is BS.

Any agreement with the company signed outside of Section 6 will be good for them and bad for us.

Why can't our union leadership understand that?
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 07:44 AM
  #193  
Hubbin’ It
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: FedEx
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
Most of the crew force wishes it would go away.

The MEC needs to justify spending a million dollars of our dues money with negotiations just down the road.

This is a money grab by the "over 25 and high 5, I've got mine" crowd, and the rest of us are getting ready to get screwed.

Increase the B fund, substantially, make it cash over cap, and leave the A fund alone, or increase it if we can.

All the rest is BS.

Any agreement with the company signed outside of Section 6 will be good for them and bad for us.

Why can't our union leadership understand that?
Can we vote them out? If so how? Many new guys around to change things. Just give me a place to start looking.
KenandDeglan is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 07:56 AM
  #194  
Hubbin’ It
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: FedEx
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by jetlaggy View Post
Did this go away or is it still a thing?
No it is alive and well. Our new retirement plan is now in the companys hands as the MEC sent it forward from the resulys of the so called survey results. This is social media so it is inaccurate. How fo we vote these guys out?
KenandDeglan is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 10:51 AM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
Most of the crew force wishes it would go away.

The MEC needs to justify spending a million dollars of our dues money with negotiations just down the road.

This is a money grab by the "over 25 and high 5, I've got mine" crowd, and the rest of us are getting ready to get screwed.

Increase the B fund, substantially, make it cash over cap, and leave the A fund alone, or increase it if we can.

All the rest is BS.

Any agreement with the company signed outside of Section 6 will be good for them and bad for us.

Why can't our union leadership understand that?
Not an over 25 guy, and yet the proposal benefits me. (And that's just the proposed floor calculation with none of the much-maligned "secret sauce" of stock market returns)

Also improves on the Pension for those just hired who will accrue 25 YOS.
The proposal also has a buy up so those recently hired who won't achieve 25 YOS (in other words, our recent new hires hired mid-40's or even 50's) would result with the GREATER of that achieved under our current A plan calculation or the changed A plan benefit calculation.


And, unless I've been missing, pretty sure you could eliminate the outside of section 6 verbiage since the vocal minority seem to run with the
Any agreement with the company will be good for them and bad for us.
kronan is offline  
Old 07-04-2019, 04:42 AM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,377
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
Not an over 25 guy, and yet the proposal benefits me. (And that's just the proposed floor calculation with none of the much-maligned "secret sauce" of stock market returns)

Also improves on the Pension for those just hired who will accrue 25 YOS.
The proposal also has a buy up so those recently hired who won't achieve 25 YOS (in other words, our recent new hires hired mid-40's or even 50's) would result with the GREATER of that achieved under our current A plan calculation or the changed A plan benefit calculation.


And, unless I've been missing, pretty sure you could eliminate the outside of section 6 verbiage since the vocal minority seem to run with the
Any agreement with the company will be good for them and bad for us.
The outside of Section 6 verbiage is perfectly accurate. Why would the company agree to give us anything outside of section 6? Only if it benefits them, at our expense.

Kind of like the union promising that "lie flat seats" won't cause us to lose a higher class of service!

Did you forget about this disclaimer on the model? You know, the one that pretty much says the numbers you get are BS?

Begin Disclaimer Verbage:

By clicking “Agree”, you acknowledge the following:
Use of this product is restricted to authorized FedEx Pilots, members of FDX Master Executive Council (MEC) and employees of Air Line Pilots Association. This product is offered as part of the FDX MEC’s ongoing education campaign concerning the variable defined benefit concept under consideration. This product is not offered for the purpose of financial, retirement planning, or legal advice. Various aspects of the variable defined benefit concept are subject to negotiation. Various assumptions have been made for the purpose of making the product operational and not as a representation concerning any final plan design. Estimates shown in this product rely on future demographic and economic experience conforming to the underlying assumptions and methods. To the extent actual experience deviates from the underlying assumptions and methods, or there are any changes in plan provisions or applicable laws, the estimates would vary accordingly. As such, users may not rely on the estimates as their actual retirement benefit.
Cheiron, Inc. owns all intellectual property rights in this product. Use of this product is subject to monitoring. Any unauthorized use of this product, including any attempt to modify, adapt, recreate, duplicate, reproduce, reverse engineer, “unlock,” decompile, combine or disassemble the product, is strictly prohibited. Use of this product does not create any third party rights in any user, and Cheiron assumes no duty or liability to any user. Cheiron disclaims all warranties with respect to the product, including but not limited to warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, performance, quality, informational accuracy, and non-infringement. In no event shall Cheiron be liable to any user for any indirect, special, incidental, economic, or consequential loss or injury of any nature arising out of or caused in whole or in part by the use of this product.
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 07-04-2019, 06:33 AM
  #197  
Hubbin’ It
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: FedEx
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
The outside of Section 6 verbiage is perfectly accurate. Why would the company agree to give us anything outside of section 6? Only if it benefits them, at our expense.

Kind of like the union promising that "lie flat seats" won't cause us to lose a higher class of service!

Did you forget about this disclaimer on the model? You know, the one that pretty much says the numbers you get are BS?

Begin Disclaimer Verbage:

By clicking “Agree”, you acknowledge the following:
Use of this product is restricted to authorized FedEx Pilots, members of FDX Master Executive Council (MEC) and employees of Air Line Pilots Association. This product is offered as part of the FDX MEC’s ongoing education campaign concerning the variable defined benefit concept under consideration. This product is not offered for the purpose of financial, retirement planning, or legal advice. Various aspects of the variable defined benefit concept are subject to negotiation. Various assumptions have been made for the purpose of making the product operational and not as a representation concerning any final plan design. Estimates shown in this product rely on future demographic and economic experience conforming to the underlying assumptions and methods. To the extent actual experience deviates from the underlying assumptions and methods, or there are any changes in plan provisions or applicable laws, the estimates would vary accordingly. As such, users may not rely on the estimates as their actual retirement benefit.
Cheiron, Inc. owns all intellectual property rights in this product. Use of this product is subject to monitoring. Any unauthorized use of this product, including any attempt to modify, adapt, recreate, duplicate, reproduce, reverse engineer, “unlock,” decompile, combine or disassemble the product, is strictly prohibited. Use of this product does not create any third party rights in any user, and Cheiron assumes no duty or liability to any user. Cheiron disclaims all warranties with respect to the product, including but not limited to warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, performance, quality, informational accuracy, and non-infringement. In no event shall Cheiron be liable to any user for any indirect, special, incidental, economic, or consequential loss or injury of any nature arising out of or caused in whole or in part by the use of this product.
Good points. Id add to the disclaimer that cheron is the same company who was the only one who apptoaches us and is gettingboaid $800,000 plus. However the video with the recently tetired MEC chairman said theu sought out many companies and cheron was doing this for nothing.
KenandDeglan is offline  
Old 07-04-2019, 06:50 AM
  #198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by KenandDeglan View Post
Good points. Id add to the disclaimer that cheron is the same company who was the only one who apptoaches us and is getting paid $800,000 plus. However the video with the recently retired MEC chairman said they sought out many companies and cheron was doing this for nothing.
Funny, doing it for nothing. I doubt it. If you look at Cheiron, they work with business, employers. They don't work for unions. Their goal is to manage risk for businesses. We are paying to do the work for the company. This This is how Cheiron describes themselves:

Cheiron is an employee-owned, full-service actuarial and financial consultancy, advising a national client base of public employers, Taft-Hartley plans, non-profits, and corporations, from offices nationwide. Our primary focus is pensions and health plans.

Our mission is — and always has been — to empower benefit plan sponsors to understand and better manage their benefit programs and their resulting financial risks through innovative technological applications and unsurpassed professional expertise.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 07-04-2019, 07:25 AM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
The outside of Section 6 verbiage is perfectly accurate. Why would the company agree to give us anything outside of section 6? Only if it benefits them, at our expense.

Kind of like the union promising that "lie flat seats" won't cause us to lose a higher class of service!

Did you forget about this disclaimer on the model? You know, the one that pretty much says the numbers you get are BS?

Begin Disclaimer Verbage:

By clicking “Agree”, you acknowledge the following:
Use of this product is restricted to authorized FedEx Pilots, members of FDX Master Executive Council (MEC) and employees of Air Line Pilots Association. This product is offered as part of the FDX MEC’s ongoing education campaign concerning the variable defined benefit concept under consideration. This product is not offered for the purpose of financial, retirement planning, or legal advice. Various aspects of the variable defined benefit concept are subject to negotiation. Various assumptions have been made for the purpose of making the product operational and not as a representation concerning any final plan design. Estimates shown in this product rely on future demographic and economic experience conforming to the underlying assumptions and methods. To the extent actual experience deviates from the underlying assumptions and methods, or there are any changes in plan provisions or applicable laws, the estimates would vary accordingly. As such, users may not rely on the estimates as their actual retirement benefit.
Cheiron, Inc. owns all intellectual property rights in this product. Use of this product is subject to monitoring. Any unauthorized use of this product, including any attempt to modify, adapt, recreate, duplicate, reproduce, reverse engineer, “unlock,” decompile, combine or disassemble the product, is strictly prohibited. Use of this product does not create any third party rights in any user, and Cheiron assumes no duty or liability to any user. Cheiron disclaims all warranties with respect to the product, including but not limited to warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, performance, quality, informational accuracy, and non-infringement. In no event shall Cheiron be liable to any user for any indirect, special, incidental, economic, or consequential loss or injury of any nature arising out of or caused in whole or in part by the use of this product.
I’m specifically drawn to this sentence of that disclaimer.

“This product is not offered for the purpose of financial, retirement planning, or legal advice.“

Ok so I’m supposed to make a decision on my retirement with a tool that specifically says it isn’t for retirement planning..
BlueMoon is online now  
Old 07-04-2019, 07:37 AM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon View Post
I’m specifically drawn to this sentence of that disclaimer.

“This product is not offered for the purpose of financial, retirement planning, or legal advice.“

Ok so I’m supposed to make a decision on my retirement with a tool that specifically says it isn’t for retirement planning..
Their purpose is not to help you figure out retirement planning, their stated purpose is to help manage pension risk for the company. I would imagine the same disclaimer will be on the final product. And maybe more.
busdriver12 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pinseeker
FedEx
489
09-02-2018 07:32 AM
FoxHunter
FedEx
10
10-01-2015 12:34 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM
Goose17
Cargo
615
02-28-2011 05:14 PM
Denny Crane
Mergers and Acquisitions
15
10-29-2008 12:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices