Search
Notices

TA???? Rumors???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2022, 09:10 AM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
Would it change your mind if you knew the MEC has not met nor been briefed by the Negotiating Committee since the 1 September meeting with The Company failed to produce a TA, so they have only read the same update you and I have read?


If there was a meeting, the minutes will be published at some point after the October MEC meeting. Don't hold your breath.






.
To add to this post,

The MEC reps and officers didn't know what the NC initially passed across the table regarding retirement either. They didn't know if the NC was asking for an increase to the FAE, the VB plan, a Flat Dollar plan, or something else. They left it up to the NC to decide how to proceed. Does that sound like the MEC is leading?
pinseeker is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 10:35 AM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 248
Default MEC Chair's Message - 9/7/22

It should be very clear by now that every bargaining session is critical. Our patience for the Company’s plodding approach to bargaining has been exhausted. Thanks to the diligent work of our Negotiating Committee, however, everything is on the table. The Company has no excuses remaining as our numbers are known and our interests in Section 28 have been communicated to the Company’s bargaining team ad nauseam. The only thing left is for the Company to decide whether it wants to recognize its most loyal employee group, which has always been there for this Company, or engage in a self-damaging campaign.

We’re not waiting for that decision. As you are aware, we have set a picketing event for September 26th in New York City. We chose that location for a much greater profile which needs to be publicized. The Company’s opportunity for a private success story is rapidly diminishing.

For some, attendance will be impossible. If that is you, I ask that you support the effort by sharing information concerning the event with your family and friends. Every pilot needs to find a way to be a force magnifier.

We obviously would welcome a proper deal that satisfies our Openers. However, I want it to be clearly understood that if that doesn’t happen between now and September 26th, we equally welcome the opportunity to gather in New York and show our collective strength and frustration with this Company. In the meantime, our negotiating team will exhaust efforts to close the deal.
WearyEyed is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 11:20 AM
  #193  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Default

Originally Posted by WearyEyed View Post
It should be very clear by now that every bargaining session is critical. Our patience for the Company’s plodding approach to bargaining has been exhausted. Thanks to the diligent work of our Negotiating Committee, however, everything is on the table. The Company has no excuses remaining as our numbers are known and our interests in Section 28 have been communicated to the Company’s bargaining team ad nauseam. The only thing left is for the Company to decide whether it wants to recognize its most loyal employee group, which has always been there for this Company, or engage in a self-damaging campaign.

We’re not waiting for that decision. As you are aware, we have set a picketing event for September 26th in New York City. We chose that location for a much greater profile which needs to be publicized. The Company’s opportunity for a private success story is rapidly diminishing.

For some, attendance will be impossible. If that is you, I ask that you support the effort by sharing information concerning the event with your family and friends. Every pilot needs to find a way to be a force magnifier.

We obviously would welcome a proper deal that satisfies our Openers. However, I want it to be clearly understood that if that doesn’t happen between now and September 26th, we equally welcome the opportunity to gather in New York and show our collective strength and frustration with this Company. In the meantime, our negotiating team will exhaust efforts to close the deal.
I must say the tone of that letter says it all!
Noworkallplay is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 11:53 AM
  #194  
Contract 2021
 
FDX1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 777 - Both
Posts: 438
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
To add to this post,

The MEC reps and officers didn't know what the NC initially passed across the table regarding retirement either. They didn't know if the NC was asking for an increase to the FAE, the VB plan, a Flat Dollar plan, or something else. They left it up to the NC to decide how to proceed. Does that sound like the MEC is leading?
Really? You know this to be true somehow and we are not all privy too? Please justify this claim.
FDX1 is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 12:52 PM
  #195  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
To add to this post,

The MEC reps and officers didn't know what the NC initially passed across the table regarding retirement either. They didn't know if the NC was asking for an increase to the FAE, the VB plan, a Flat Dollar plan, or something else. They left it up to the NC to decide how to proceed. Does that sound like the MEC is leading?

I found myself agreeing with some of your recent posts, but this one seems divisive and unfounded. I have went to meetings and talked with the NC and my reps and this is not what they said. Is this another rumor that has been communicated about by the union? Are you falling into the companies trap? Definitely not a substantiated accusation from what I have been told by my reps and NC.
Noworkallplay is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 09:53 PM
  #196  
Nice lookin' tree, there!
 
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD-11, old man
Posts: 2,199
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
To add to this post,

The MEC reps and officers didn't know what the NC initially passed across the table regarding retirement either. They didn't know if the NC was asking for an increase to the FAE, the VB plan, a Flat Dollar plan, or something else. They left it up to the NC to decide how to proceed. Does that sound like the MEC is leading?
Sorry Pin, you are incorrect. I know this for a fact as I was actually there.
Cheers,
fbh
frozenboxhauler is offline  
Old 09-08-2022, 01:53 AM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Fetal in the hub
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by frozenboxhauler View Post
Sorry Pin, you are incorrect. I know this for a fact as I was actually there.
Cheers,
fbh
Ok, then why is it a mystery to rest of us? Oh I remember a TA is supposed to be like a box of cracker Jack's you just don't know what you get until you open it. This entire process is both maddening and laughable. In 30 years in this business this is the weakest union I've ever seen. I'm not talking about the leadership. I mean the Back biting, self dealing, me first behavior, of the rank and file member is so common one wonders why the company doesn't just drag this out ad infinitum. Couple that with "we can't tell you what we're asking for" because of the oft repeated and absurd everytime it's spoken notion about "negotiating in public" and i find myself having no faith in the process nor those repeating just trust us. The leading survey questions and the outside of section 6 offers to amend a major section of the contract all communicate the top down shut up and color mentality that has no place in a private workforce.
This TA will be full of concessions at a time when there should be none. Offering your VB plan as an "option" while offering little to no gains for the DB plan isn't a win. It's a concession. Give aways on vacation and travel arent part of some hard fought strategy to secure an industry leading contract. They are concessions pure and simple. If you need to read them over and consider their merits in the midst of the largest labor shortage in more a generation and with the company yielding eye watering finanical gains , well I look forward to more degraded TAs to come under the nuanced guise of "this works for me".
Shaman is offline  
Old 09-08-2022, 03:08 AM
  #198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman View Post
Ok, then why is it a mystery to rest of us? Oh I remember a TA is supposed to be like a box of cracker Jack's you just don't know what you get until you open it. This entire process is both maddening and laughable. In 30 years in this business this is the weakest union I've ever seen. I'm not talking about the leadership. I mean the Back biting, self dealing, me first behavior, of the rank and file member is so common one wonders why the company doesn't just drag this out ad infinitum. Couple that with "we can't tell you what we're asking for" because of the oft repeated and absurd everytime it's spoken notion about "negotiating in public" and i find myself having no faith in the process nor those repeating just trust us. The leading survey questions and the outside of section 6 offers to amend a major section of the contract all communicate the top down shut up and color mentality that has no place in a private workforce.
This TA will be full of concessions at a time when there should be none. Offering your VB plan as an "option" while offering little to no gains for the DB plan isn't a win. It's a concession. Give aways on vacation and travel arent part of some hard fought strategy to secure an industry leading contract. They are concessions pure and simple. If you need to read them over and consider their merits in the midst of the largest labor shortage in more a generation and with the company yielding eye watering finanical gains , well I look forward to more degraded TAs to come under the nuanced guise of "this works for me".
Wow!!! Well said! Well Said!
StarClipper is offline  
Old 09-08-2022, 11:01 AM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Anthrax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 629
Default

Shaman is spot on. But most are too full of themselves to see the bigger game at play. I get the arrogance. after all, you’ve landed the dream job. the majors, is what they’re telling new hires at indoc. sadly, more than half the pilot group can’t shake the minor league mentality, the boasting, the posturing, y’all are posers at best, beaten over and over again by the better opponent, beaten by your own arrogance really, and no one can fault you because after all you are human, enticed by shiny things, look at how the company won the vote last time from the imminent retirees, buy their votes, and shove the new work rules up our asses!
Anthrax is offline  
Old 09-08-2022, 11:37 AM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default TA???? Rumors???

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
Would it change your mind if you knew the MEC has not met nor been briefed by the Negotiating Committee since the 1 September meeting with The Company failed to produce a TA, so they have only read the same update you and I have read?


If there was a meeting, the minutes will be published at some point after the October MEC meeting. Don't hold your breath.






.
Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
To add to this post,

The MEC reps and officers didn't know what the NC initially passed across the table regarding retirement either. They didn't know if the NC was asking for an increase to the FAE, the VB plan, a Flat Dollar plan, or something else. They left it up to the NC to decide how to proceed. Does that sound like the MEC is leading?


What I’m saying is that if the MEC disagreed with communications or anything, they can and would change their current stance. That fact that they haven’t speaks to what I’m saying, the MEC is doing exactly what it wants, whether that is status quo or change.

You guys just don’t agree with the manner in which they are leading, which is perfectly fine. Let’s just be clear about what we are talking about.
FXLAX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
Homa
Major
35
07-21-2010 12:53 PM
RockBottom
Major
2
08-20-2006 08:30 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
1
07-06-2006 05:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices