Read the latest NC update
#231
I understand. Did the rep share any insight? An answer would certainly help the NC's goal of squashing rumors.
#232
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 795
I’m not going to get into the specifics of the conversations I have with my rep in a public forum. The reps are bound by a NDA, I am positive you know that. It’s interesting though that in some instances things have been flat out denied, the NC went into specific details about the company’s ask in this video. Why can’t a subject like training bumps be addressed if you are so certain there haven’t been changes TA’d?
#233
I’m not going to get into the specifics of the conversations I have with my rep in a public forum. The reps are bound by a NDA, I am positive you know that. It’s interesting though that in some instances things have been flat out denied, the NC went into specific details about the company’s ask in this video. Why can’t a subject like training bumps be addressed if you are so certain there haven’t been changes TA’d?
#234
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
is your expectation they address every rumor posted on the Internet? How many times has it been stated to not chase the rumors. Yet you can’t help yourself
#235
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
I’m not going to get into the specifics of the conversations I have with my rep in a public forum. The reps are bound by a NDA, I am positive you know that. It’s interesting though that in some instances things have been flat out denied, the NC went into specific details about the company’s ask in this video. Why can’t a subject like training bumps be addressed if you are so certain there haven’t been changes TA’d?
I have a great idea. How about we wait until the contract comes out to discuss each area instead of jumping to conclusions.
#236
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
#238
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 795
You have a glaring double standard when it comes to communication from ALPA. The NC spoke at length about gains that have been agreed to. Why is it such a problem to also speak in generics about areas that have been conceded? The option to say “there have been no changes to the way bumps for training are conducted” would also be the sufficient if you all are so certain that this is simply a bad rumor. The NC mentioned specifically protecting DH language. The issue of bumps for training is being discussed amongst the pilots whether you like it or not. If it is just a rumor it should be squashed. If it isn’t a rumor it should be addressed. It is a double standard to freely spread news about gains but cry foul when concessions are mentioned. This pilot group is made up of thousands of intelligent professionals and they should be treated as such. This reeks of “I know better than you do what is good for you.”
I know you don’t see this but you’re doing more harm than good in your attempt to control the messaging.
Last edited by UnusualAttitude; 02-04-2023 at 08:15 PM.
#239
So there will be nothing to report, other than what we already know about him.
#240
His mom would not give him permission to leave the basement, I am guessing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post